Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
149851 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Se busca confrontar el llamado que hiciera Alwin Plantiga a los filósofos cristianos para que asuman los intereses de la comunidad a la que pertenecen, con el análisis que realiza Iván Garzón sobre el lugar de la religión en el ejercicio de la razón pública, con el propósito de examinar los cambios que se han producido, dentro del pensamiento político liberal, en lo que concierne al lugar de la religión en la organización de la sociedad. Esto le plantea a los creyentes nuevos retos para lograr, desde sus convicciones religiosas, participar activamente en la organización de sociedadesque logren establecer formas de convivencia pacífica que respeten la creciente diversidad cultural de los ciudadanos. ; This article seeks to confront Alvin Plantinga's call to Christian philosophers to assume the interests of the community to which they belong with Iván Garzón's analysis of the place of religion in the exercise of public reason. The purpose is to examine the changes that have taken place, within liberal political thought, in relation to the place of religion in the organization of society. This raises new challenges for believers to achieve, from their religious convictions, their active participation in the organization of societies that accomplish the establishment of forms of peaceful coexistence that respect the growing cultural diversity of citizens.
BASE
Se busca confrontar el llamado que hiciera Alwin Plantiga a los filósofos cristianos para que asuman los intereses de la comunidad a la que pertenecen, con el análisis que realiza Iván Garzón sobre el lugar de la religión en el ejercicio de la razón pública, con el propósito de examinar los cambios que se han producido, dentro del pensamiento político liberal, en lo que concierne al lugar de la religión en la organización de la sociedad. Esto le plantea a los creyentes nuevos retos para lograr, desde sus convicciones religiosas, participar activamente en la organización de sociedadesque logren establecer formas de convivencia pacífica que respeten la creciente diversidad cultural de los ciudadanos. ; This article seeks to confront Alvin Plantinga's call to Christian philosophers to assume the interests of the community to which they belong with Iván Garzón's analysis of the place of religion in the exercise of public reason. The purpose is to examine the changes that have taken place, within liberal political thought, in relation to the place of religion in the organization of society. This raises new challenges for believers to achieve, from their religious convictions, their active participation in the organization of societies that accomplish the establishment of forms of peaceful coexistence that respect the growing cultural diversity of citizens.
BASE
In: Zeitschrift für Politik: ZfP, Band 52, Heft 1, S. 80-96
ISSN: 0044-3360
World Affairs Online
In: Women in religions
In: Harvard international review, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 32-67
ISSN: 0739-1854
Examines the impact of religion on the modern world, including its role in ethnic conflict, and the global surge in religious fundamentalism; 6 articles Contents: Holy orders: religious opposition to modern states, by Mark Juergensmeyer; Resisting modernity: the backlash against secularism, by Karen Armstrong; Divine intervention: regional reconciliation through faith, by David Smock; Church and state: social and religious identity in Southeast Europe, by Symeon Giannakos; Correlated conflicts: the independent nature of ethnic strife, by Jonathan Fox; Spirit of capitalism: religion and economic development, by Robert J. Barro.
In: Ashgate philosophy of religion series
Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- Acknowledgments -- INTRODUCTION. The Sacralization of Politics -- CHAPTER 1. A Never-Never Religion, A Substitute for Religion, or a New Religion? -- CHAPTER 2. Civil Religions and Political Religions: From Democratic Revolutions to Totalitarian States -- CHAPTER 3. The Leviathan as a Church: Totalitarianism and Political Religion -- CHAPTER 4. The Invasion of the Idols: Christians against Totalitarian Religions -- CHAPTER 5. Toward the Third Millennium: The Sacralization of Politics in States both New and Old -- CHAPTER 6. Religions of Politics: Definitions, Distinctions, and Qualifications -- Notes
In: Jahrbuch der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Sportwissenschaft e.V. 3.2007
In: Studien zur Geschichte des Sports 7
Die Ursprünge des modernen Sports, der auch als "Weltreligion des 20. Jahrhunderts" bezeichnet wurde, lassen sich bis auf ihre kultischen Wurzeln in der Antike zurückführen. Dieses dritte Jahrbuch der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Sportwissenschaft e. V. enthält neun Beiträge, die sich auf dem Evangelischen Kirchentag in Köln 2007 unter dem Titel "Sport-Körper-Religion" mit diesem spannungsreichen Verhältnis von Sport und Religion befaßt haben. Neben Studien über die Sicht auf den Sport in verschiedenen Religionen sind auch grundlegende wissenschaftsmethodische Aufsätze versammelt. Der Band ist gedacht für diejenigen, die sich für die Beziehung von Sport und Religion interessieren und vor allem für Studierende und Lehrende der Religions-, Sport- und historischen Wissenschaften.
In: Internationale Politik: das Magazin für globales Denken, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 27-34
ISSN: 1430-175X
World Affairs Online
In: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ZG72V7
In addressing the topic assigned to me -- "Interreligious Dialogue, the Environment, and Power" -- I have decided to focus on the first and the last elements: Dialogue and Power. More precisely, I would like to reflect on how the question of "power" can serve as the mediating link between religion and dialogue. Many people, especially academicians, would regard such a proposal with great suspicion, if not downright opposition. For them, the vital relationship between religion and power is the problem. Precisely because religion is such a powerful force in the lives of people, precisely because the powerful can make such exploitative and violent use of religion -- precisely for such reasons many voices today are calling for a moratorium on interreligious dialogue; or they are calling for the exclusion of religion from all political or intercultural discussions. I want to take these reservations or objections as seriously as I can. I begin, therefore with some questions.
BASE