Suchergebnisse

ABSTRACKThe next General Election is an Election called vital role in a Democracy. Especially Countries such as Indonesia is a Republic, As for the Institutions it serves to meet the three Principles of Democracy, namely : Popular Sovereignty, The Legitimacy Of Government and The Change Of Government on a regular basis and to the three Principles to ensure awake and implementing the ideals of independence and prevent certain interests in government bodies or substituted popular sovereignty became sovereign rulers of democratic elections is the expectation that every citizen with the right of people every Election can be united with both and in the general election no discrimination that resulted in the Destruction of Democratic Elections. When there is no Definite Election, Election Organizer in Indonesia is the Election Commission or the Abbreviated Commission. KPU is a National institution whose jurisdiction covers the entire territory of Indonesia then the Commission is an independent agency to do its job what it is free from the influence of those who want to destroy and inhibit the performance of the Commission.in carrying out their duties as Election, Organizers burden borne by what it is large because of fatigue in demand Elections quality makes running all Election Stages are the duties and obligations of the Commission, and the Commission guidance in performing tasks on RI law Number 15 of 2011 On General Election. Keyword :Tinjauan Yuridis

Analyzes election results and cabinet changes in Ireland during 2004. Tables, References.

Background to and outcome of the parliamentary elections in Belarus, May 1995.

Analysis of the Oct. 1990 Pakistani elections. Summary in English p. 332.

Examines the Dec. 1996 presidential election in which Boris Yeltsin was reelected president; campaign, electoral geography, election results, candidates, and other issues. Summary in English.

Defeat of the communist United Workers' Party in a spring 1989 parliamentary election.

Der Beitrag befaßt sich schwerpunktmäßig mit dem "Wahlmarathon", den Taiwan in den Monaten Dezember 1989 bis März 1990 absolvierte. Das Interesse gilt dabei sowohl den Wahlkampfauseinandersetzungen zwischen der Regierungspartei Guomindang und den Oppositionsparteien (Minjindang) als auch den GMD-internen Konflikten um die Kandidatenaufstellung zur Präsidentenwahl. Insbesondere gilt es jedoch der im Kontext der Wahlauseinandersetzungen sichtbar gewordenen tiefgreifenden Verfassungskrise (Legitimationsdefizit der Repräsentativorgane aufgrund des Festhaltens an der Fiktion einer "gesamtchinesischen Vertretung, Kritik an Machtbefugnissen des Präsidenten ). Angesprochen wird daneben die Führungskrise des im Amt bestätigten Präsidenten Li Denghui. (BIOst-Gsh)

Performance of the major political parties in the Jan. 25, 1987 general election.

Village head election must be continuously developed and adapted to the development of the community in the village. The Indonesian nation has stated clearly in the constitution of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the fourth paragraph which is the purpose of national and state life ". protecting the whole Indonesian nation and the entire Indonesian blood sphere, and to promote general welfare, educating the life of the nation ". In 2017, 28 Nagari in Agam District will carry out the election of Head/Village Guard/Nagari. The elections will be held on 16, 19, 22, 25 and 29 July 2017, with a total of 128,000 voters, with an E-voting system. Through the e-voting system in the selection of Wali Nagari (Pilwana) it has made it easier for the villagers/nagari in choosing, and the potential for cheating is less than the paper voting system.

THE ASSUMPTION THAT CANDIDATES MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO ELECTORAL OUTCOMES IN BRITISH GENERAL ELECTIONS IS TESTED THROUGH A COMPARISON OF THE 1983 AND 1987 GENERAL ELECTIONS. INCUMBENT'S CONSTITUENCY-SPECIFIC VOTE CHANGE (ICVC) BETWEEN THE JUNE 1983 AND JUNE 1987 BRITISH GENERAL ELECTIONS IS MEASURED BY SUBTRACTING THE AVERAGE REGIONAL VOTE CHANGE FOR THE INCUMBENT'S PARTY FROM THE CONSTITUENCY VOTE CHANGE REGISTERED BY THE INCUMBENT. REGRESSION ANALYSIS FINDS ICVC TO BE MOST SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCED IN BOTH THE LABOR AND CONSERVATIVE PARTIES BY THE INCUMBENT'S LENTH OF TENURE. VARIABLES INDICATING THE SECURITY OR INSECURITY OF THE SEAT IN ELECTORAL TERMS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY RELATED TO ICVC IN THE CONSERVATIVE BUT NOT IN THE LABOR CASE. THE FINDINGS FOR LABOR INDICATE ICVC TO BE GREATER WHERE ELECTORAL SECURITY IS GREATER. THIS FINDING MIGHT BE EXPLAINED BY SUCCESSFUL CONSERVATIVE PARTY CONCENTRATION ON CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH LABOR INCUMBENTS APPEAR TO BE VULNERABLE.

The 2016 presidential election was a turbulent one that required many voters, particularly women, to make difficult decisions when it came time to vote. With this in mind, this research examines whether the particular issue of the future ideological direction of the Supreme Court was a possible deciding factor for women who chose to vote for President Trump. Specifically, I asked whether women who voted for Trump were more likely to have a negative assessment of the current Supreme Court. In my research, I used a logistic regression to examine data collected from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) of both Republican women and voters in general. Since the CCES did not directly ask voters a question about the significance of the Supreme Court as a voting issue, to measure its significance, the models were organized using four major issues that were deemed particularly relevant to the Supreme Court recently: abortion, gay marriage, immigration, and healthcare. The results from this research were mixed – showing that, for Republican women in particular, the Supreme Court was likely a relevant factor but not necessarily a clearly deciding factor. Interestingly, Supreme Court assessments exhibited the most substantive significance among models examining voters in general, not just women.

[4], 74, [2] p. ; 21 cm. (8vo) ; Half-title: Mr. Clark's election sermon. May 30, 1781. ; "Errata."--p. [75].

Do voters sanction incumbent parties collectively for the performance of the government, or do they hold politicians accountable individually? Most economic voting studies assume that voters hold the incumbent party collectively accountable and that candidate-specific factors do not have an independent effect on how voters punish and reward incumbents. This article argues that voters weigh the past executive's performance differently, depending on the degree to which the presidential candidate is identified with the performance of the government. It differentiates between presidents running for re-election, successors-political allies of the outgoing president-and non-successors-party-internal opponents of the president. The article shows that re-running presidents are held more accountable than the other two and that successors are subject to greater electoral sanctioning than non-successors. Empirically, the article estimates multi-level models on an original data set that combines information on candidate types with individual-level observations from 51 election years in Latin America. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright holder.]