Le lecteur pourra prendre connaissance dans ces pages des interventions de la table ronde qui s'est tenue lors des journées d'étude organisées par Politix en vue de ce centième numéro. Ses participants ont, à partir de leur expérience propre, réfléchi aux opportunités et aux contraintes qui définissent actuellement l'édition de revues dans les sciences sociales.
Le lecteur pourra prendre connaissance dans ces pages des interventions de la table ronde qui s'est tenue lors des journées d'étude organisées par Politix en vue de ce centième numéro. Ses participants ont, à partir de leur expérience propre, réfléchi aux opportunités et aux contraintes qui définissent actuellement l'édition de revues dans les sciences sociales.
Le lecteur pourra prendre connaissance dans ces pages des interventions de la table ronde qui s'est tenue lors des journées d'étude organisées par Politix en vue de ce centième numéro. Ses participants ont, à partir de leur expérience propre, réfléchi aux opportunités et aux contraintes qui définissent actuellement l'édition de revues dans les sciences sociales.
Le lecteur pourra prendre connaissance dans ces pages des interventions de la table ronde qui s'est tenue lors des journées d'étude organisées par Politix en vue de ce centième numéro. Ses participants ont, à partir de leur expérience propre, réfléchi aux opportunités et aux contraintes qui définissent actuellement l'édition de revues dans les sciences sociales.
Le lecteur pourra prendre connaissance dans ces pages des interventions de la table ronde qui s'est tenue lors des journées d'étude organisées par Politix en vue de ce centième numéro. Ses participants ont, à partir de leur expérience propre, réfléchi aux opportunités et aux contraintes qui définissent actuellement l'édition de revues dans les sciences sociales.
In: Social work in health care: the journal of health care social work ; a quarterly journal adopted by the Society for Social Work Leadership in Health Care, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 43-50
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political science ; official journal of the Dutch Political Science Association (Nederlandse Kring voor Wetenschap der Politiek), Band 36, Heft 1, S. 100-103
Lawyers traditionally oppose openings towards other social sciences. The challenge is simple: preserve the autonomy of the law, which relates both to the subject studied and to the way in which it is studied and to those who study it. In the 21st s, however, while interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are encouraged throughout universities, the isolation of knowledge and the work of legal faculties may appear to be less and less justified. In this study, consideration should be given to the possibility and appropriateness of receiving in law lessons and methods specific, in particular, to economics, sociology or anthropology. ; International audience Lawyers are traditionally opposed to openings towards other social sciences. The challenge is simple: to preserve the autonomy of law, which relates to the subject matter as well as how to study it and those who study it. However, today, while everywhere interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary are encouraged, the isolation of the law may appear less and less justified. This study will propose some reflections concerning the practical and epistemological legitimacy and relevance of the interdisciplinarity. ; Lawyers traditionally oppose openings towards other social sciences. The challenge is simple: preserve the autonomy of the law, which relates both to the subject studied and to the way in which it is studied and to those who study it. In the 21st s, however, while interdisciplinarity, multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity are encouraged throughout universities, the isolation of knowledge and the work of legal faculties may appear to be less and less justified. In this study, consideration should be given to the possibility and appropriateness of receiving in law lessons and methods specific, in particular, to economics, sociology or anthropology. ; Les juristes s'opposent traditionnellement aux ouvertures en direction des autres sciences sociales. L'enjeu est simple : préserver l'autonomie du droit, laquelle se ...
Zitatdatenbanken bilden die Datengrundlagen für zahlreiche szientometrische Untersuchungen, Evaluationen wissenschaftlicher Leistungen und Uni-Rankings. In der Literatur finden sich kaum Hinweise auf endogene Fehler (Original richtig, Datenbankeintrag falsch) in den kostenpflichtigen Datenbanken. Banale Fehler (z.B. Falschschreibung der Namen von Autorinnen oder Autoren) in Datenbanken hätten nur geringe Relevanz. Die Fehlersuche zu Pierre Bourdieu als "cited author" im SSCI (Vergleich Original - SSCI-Record) ergab mehr als 85 Mutationen. Die Fallstudien zeigen eine hohe Anzahl endogener Datenbankfehler. In den Rechtswissenschaften übliche Referenzen in Fußnoten laufen große Gefahr, in Phantomreferenzen verwandelt zu werden (Fallstudie Harvard Law Review: 99 Prozent Fehler). Dem Anspruch des SSCI, die "relevanten" globalen Sozialwissenschaften abzubilden - für alle im SSCI erfassten Disziplinen -, stehen offenbar Mängel in Datenerfassung und -verarbeitung im Wege.
The Social Sciences and Humanities Open Science Cloud (SSHOC) is one of the five European Union H2020 Programme " INFRA-EOSC-2018" recently funded cluster projects (together with ENVRI-FAIR, PANOSC, ESCAPE, EOSC-LIFE) that will leverage and interconnect existing and new infrastructures from the SSH ERICs and foster interdisciplinary research and collaboration. An ambitious number of 47 organisations, experienced and skilled in Social Science & Humanities Infrastructures have gathered from all over Europe to collaborate together on SSHOC, the Social Science and Humanities Open Science Cloud project, coordinated by the Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA). The project started its journey in January 2019 and runs through to April 2022 to realise the transition from the current landscape with disciplinary silos and separated e-infrastructure facilities into a fully-fledged cloud-based infrastructure where data are FAIR, tools and training readily accessible, thus providing a significant contribution towards achieving the vision put forward by the European Cloud Initiative - and support the implementation of European Open Science Cloud. All SSH ESFRI Landmarks and Projects (CESSDA, ESS, DARIAH, CLARIN and SHARE), relevant international SSH data infrastructures and the Association of European Research Libraries (LIBER) participate in the SSHOC project ensuring an inclusive approach. The consortium has the expertise to cover the whole data cycle: from data creation and curation to optimal re-use of data and can address training and advocacy to increase actual re-use of data. The consortium is also very well placed to address SSH specific challenges such as the distributed character of its infrastructures, multi-linguality, huge internal complexity of some of the data it deals with and secured access to sensitive data. The project will pool, harmonize and make easily usable tools and services that will allow to process, enrich, analyse and compare the vast heterogeneous collections of SSH ...
Compares and explores how social democratic governments have had to adapt to globalization, European integration and social change; and whether they have successfully managed to uphold old social democratic goals and values in light of the devaluation of traditional policy instruments.