Suchergebnisse

The essential purpose of this research study is to describe the relationship between inclusive education and its development with the philosophy of religion in Peru. Based on the primary data analysis for collecting the data, this research study used informative questions related to the independent and dependent variables. These data were gathered from people who know about inclusive education and development. Some questions were fulfilled by students of schools and colleges. The research study used smart PLS software and generated different results to investigate. Inclusive education and its development is the primary independent variable, including the physical environment, sensory attitude, expectations, and opportunities; these are all sub-parts of an independent variable. The philosophy of religion is the main dependent variable. The composite reliability, discriminant validity, R square, F square, total effects, significant analysis, and the fitness analysis model also describe the Algorithm model of smart PLS related to the inclusive education and development and philosophy of religion. The overall result found a positive and direct relationship between inclusive education and its development with the philosophy of religion in Peru.

Title Page; Copyright Page; Dedication Page; Contents; Foreword; Preface; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Part I: Drury and Wittgenstein:; Part II: Drury's Recollectionsof Wittgenstein; Contribution to a BBC Symposium; Conversations with Wittgenstein; Some Notes on Conversations; Part III: Drury's PhilosophicalWritings; The Method of Philosophy; Letters to a Student of Philosophy; Six Reflections shared withRush Rhees; University College DublinLecture: 1967; Letter to Rush Rhees; Part IV: Drury on Religion; Letters to Rhees; Undated Letter Extract; Letter to D.Z -- Phillips: 23 July 1964.

Arthur Schopenhauer was the first Western thinker who incorporated thoughts of the Upanishads in his own philosophy. His appreciation for Indian philosophy and culture is quite well known. Presently serious research work is going on in different disciplines in different academic institutions and universities in the West to examine the influence of Indian philosophy and culture in the philosophical thinking of Germany, particularly in relation to Arthur Schopenhauer and vice versa. This book provides a common platform for interaction to the scholars from East and West to express their views on the link between Eastern and Western philosophy. It significantly contributes to a better understanding not only of the connection between Schopenhauer and Indian philosophical systems but also of the increasing interest in this relation. The book includes papers of eminent scholars. The papers shed new light on the relationship between Schopenhauer's philosophy and the different aspects of Indian philosophy and culture, and thus offer a rich source of research material.

"Is it possible to strive for autonomy and diversity in society without weakening the common good? How much autonomy and diversity are possible without destroying social cohesion and human solidarity? And how much social commonality is necessary to be able to live an autonomous life and do justice to diversity?"

Without Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) there would probably be no modern discipline of 'the philosophy of religion'. Kant's considerable influence has ensured that philosophers, in addressing religious questions, have focused on such issues as arguments for and against the existence of God; the question of immortality; the compatibility of human evil and transcendent goodness; and the relationship between morality and the divine. Many books already explore the nature of his influence. But this one goes further. It argues that Kant's theoretical philosophy, also called 'the critical philosophy', con

In this book the author argues that the Falasifa, the Philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age, are usefully interpreted through the prism of the contemporary, western ethics of belief. He contends that their position amounts to what he calls 'Moderate Evidentialism' - that only for the epistemic elite what one ought to believe is determined by one's evidence. The author makes the case that the Falasifa's position is well argued, ingeniously circumvents issues in the epistemology of testimony, and is well worth taking seriously in the contemporary debate. He reasons that this is especially the case since the position has salutary consequences for how to respond to the sceptic, and for how we are to conceive of extremist belief. Anthony Robert Booth is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Sussex, UK. He also works for Trusting Banks, a NWO (Dutch Science Foundation) funded collaboration between the Universities of Groningen, the Netherlands, and Cambridge, UK. He has worked mainly on issues at the intersection of ethics and epistemology, and has published articles appearing in such journals as Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Synthese. He also co-edited Intuitions (2014)