Reduction in the Social Sciences: The Future or Utopia?
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 425-444
ISSN: 1552-7441
2476874 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 425-444
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 53-63
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 115-126
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: IASSIST quarterly: IQ, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 22
ISSN: 2331-4141
Making use of Data on Social Science in Slovakia
In: IASSIST quarterly: IQ, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 13
ISSN: 2331-4141
Data Infrastructure For The Social Sciences In The Netherlands
In: Archipel: études interdisciplinaires sur le monde insulindien, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 35-73
ISSN: 2104-3655
The Social Sciences in Indonesia II: Research (Christian Pelras).
In: The Middle East journal, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 203
ISSN: 0026-3141
World Affairs Online
In: Socialism and democracy: the bulletin of the Research Group on Socialism and Democracy, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 213-217
ISSN: 1745-2635
In: The global review of ethnopolitics, Band 3, Heft 3-4, S. 102-104
ISSN: 1471-8804
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 371-391
ISSN: 1477-9021
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 188-189
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: La Revue du MAUSS, Band 48, Heft 2, S. 275-292
ISSN: 1776-3053
L'interrogation sur les concepts qui pourraient servir à l'unification des sciences sociales, spécialement entre la sociologie et l'économie, ne peut manquer de rencontrer la notion d'institution. Si l'on en croit aussi bien Durkheim que Mauss, l'institution est le fait social premier. Cette définition de la sociologie comme « science de l'institution » n'a pas eu la postérité espérée. Peut-être tendait-elle trop à restreindre l'institution à l'institué, ce qui a favorisé une sociologie de la conformité. On constate surtout, dans la seconde moitié du xx e siècle, un chiasme entre une critique des institutions, du côté de la sociologie, et le recours fréquent et divers à la notion d'institution, du côté de l'économie. L'unité de la science sociale suppose de remettre au centre de l'analyse l'institution comme création historique dans tous les domaines de l'activité collective.
By 1965, behavioral social science had become a widely accepted approach to the scientific study of man and his politics. Any uncertainty as to what constituted a proper social science seemed to be raised most deeply by writers acquainted with the nature of physical science which most social science methodology seemed desparately to emulate. Recent comments by Nobel physicist Hideki Yukawa seem to indicate that little has changed in the physicist's scientific method in the last ten years and it would appear to be time to review those theories which prompted some radical reconsideration of the nature of both natural and social science over the last decade. The ideas which seem to lead to such a reconsideration include Werner Heisenberg's principle of uncertainty — that the observer's attempt to pin-point one phenomenon in nature disrupts or interferes with closely related phenomena; and Niels Bohr's principle of complimentarity where two seemingly different or contradictory theories when taken together offer a more complete understanding of a given phenomenon in the physical world. Michael Polanyi's notions of "tacit knowledge"and "indwelling" indicate that "we know more than we can tell" and that our view of isolated and detailed aspects of reality are rooted in a "prior knowledge"or even "involvement" in a larger whole. The capability of seeing or sharing in such larger wholes has been considered by humanistic psychologist Abraham Maslow as a measure of the scientist's maturity. A social scientist is open to more when he is a healthy person. Empathy, participation and man's purposefulness are the three human characteristics considered in this paper all of which seem to appear as the crux of a science of man by which all science must reinterpret its own methodology. To so interpret such characteristics rather than tailoring them to fit existing physical and behavioral scientific method and theory is to put certain ethical and political responsibilities of the social scientist at the very center of the nature, method and theory of our understanding of man and the science of man. The theories of Heisenberg, Bohr, Polanyi and Maslow support such a radical reinterpretation and the conclusion of the paper is that such a reinterpretation does not so much redefine social science in the light of natural science, but puts a reconsideration of the nature of man and science at center stage, so that a total regeneration of all science may be possible.
BASE
Investigates how activists confront global powers with their street-level dissent. Two Sides of a Barricade argues that to construct global democracy, conflict and dissent must be taken seriously. Christian Scholl explores the political significance of the confrontations within four sites of interaction: bodies, space, communication, and law. Each site of struggle provides a different entry point to understand the influence of protester and police tactics on each other. At the same time, the four sites of struggle allow a comprehensive analysis of how the contestation of global hegemonic forces during summit protests trigger a preemptive shift in social control through increased deployment of biopolitical forms of power. Christian Scholl is Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. He is the coauthor (with Amory Starr and Luis Fernandez) of Shutting Down the Streets: Political Violence and Social Control in the Global Era .
BASE