Implementing Transition: Legal and Political Limits
In: University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 50/2017
10629 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 50/2017
SSRN
Working paper
In: University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 57/2017
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Common Market Law Review 52 (2015), pp. 17–50.
SSRN
In: Politeja: pismo Wydziału Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Band 17, Heft 3(66), S. 145-156
ISSN: 2391-6737
The Phenomenon of Brexit in the Considerations of the School of Law and Economics The article addresses the issue of Brexit in the context of economic analysis of law using a qualitative method, namely the textual analysis of selected papers devoted to both the process of secession of Great Britain from the European Union and the aforementioned research school. The hypothesis of this work is as follows: economic analysis of law reveals limited applicability to the exegesis of the Community disintegration mechanisms, including Brexit, which is one of the symptoms of these processes. According to the author, it reveals certain shortcomings in the research procedures regarding the phenomenon of EU decomposition, although, on the other hand, some of its components still remain valid.
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 57, Heft 6, S. 1366-1382
ISSN: 1468-5965
AbstractUK nationals will lose their EU citizenship status as a result of the Brexit referendum. To prevent this, several commentators, including the European Parliament Brexit negotiator Guy Verhofstadt, proposed to grant associate EU citizenship to UK nationals to safeguard their rights as EU citizens after Brexit. We make the case against associate EU citizenship, dismissing it on three grounds. First, it violates the letter and the spirit of EU law. Second, it violates core EU values, including the EU's promise to respect the constitutional traditions of member states and the values of democracy and the rule of law. Third, it is against EU's interests, as associate EU citizenship fails to respect reciprocity in EU relations with third countries and undermines the coherence of the edifice of EU constitutionalism.
UK nationals will lose their EU citizenship status as a result of the Brexit referendum. To prevent this, several commentators, including the European Parliament Brexit negotiator Guy Verhofstadt, proposed to grant associate EU citizenship to UK nationals to safeguard their rights as EU citizens after Brexit. We make the case against associate EU citizenship, dismissing it on three grounds. First, it violates the letter and the spirit of EU law. Second, it violates core EU values, including the EU's promise to respect the constitutional traditions of member states and the values of democracy and the rule of law. Third, it is against EU's interests, as associate EU citizenship fails to respect reciprocity in EU relations with third countries and undermines the coherence of the edifice of EU constitutionalism.
BASE
In: Questions internationales, Band 110, Heft 6, S. 42-50
Grande récession, choc migratoire, attaques jihadistes, Brexit, pandémie de Covid-19…, ces dernières années, l'Union européenne a dû faire face à une succession de crises sans précédent. Pourtant, les pronostics alarmistes qui prédisaient sa fin ont été déjoués. À quelques semaines du début de la présidence française du Conseil de l'Union européenne, une première depuis 2008, quel état des lieux institutionnel peut-on dresser de l'Europe post-Brexit ?
Friday's symbolic departure from the EU by the UK at 11.00pm, accompanied by celebrations in Parliament Square was, according to the government (Johnson) narrative, the moment when Brexit was finally "done". The reality, of course, is that only when we know the nature of the free trade agreement that exists, or not, between the UK and the EU, will we really know what the effects of Brexit will be.
BASE
In what has been another huge year for the Centre for Brexit Studies, with Brexit news, events, conferences, research and a lot of press, alongside a global pandemic, we're delighted that this year has been the most successful on our daily blog so far. We're pleased that so many of you enjoy reading posts from experts and academics from across the world on this blog on a daily basis.
BASE
Blog: Comments on: Home
[…] Ros Taylor, Managing Editor, LSE Brexit blog […]
Blog: Comments on: Home
[…] LSE BREXIT – Published on August 29, 2019 […]
This article is an attempt to analyse the collaboration between the Labour and the Scottish nationalists in the context of the formation of the modern British political agenda. The participants of the British political space, being concerned about the questions of the United Kingdom leaving the European Union, inevitably face a number of challenges, and the problem of their internal interaction remains one of the most significant. Opposition parties are at an impasse: the Brexit negotiations seem as good as paralysed. The Prime Minister is being put in a very difficult position: a motion of no confidence in December, the failure of her proposals for the Brexit deal in January. The ruling conservative party itself is deeply divided. Every now and then there is some calls for a second the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. And in that event, to which extent is the opposition coalition possible – the Labor Party and the Scottish nationalists? And if so, what are its future prospects?
BASE
Around 100 million animals are killed annually for the global fur trade, with 85% reared on fur farms and 15% trapped in the wild. Fur farming is banned across the United Kingdom (UK) under the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Act 2000 in England and Wales and parallel legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Despite the farming bans, the import and sale of fur products to the UK have continued, largely due to European Union (EU) membership. The UK left the EU in 2020 and the British government is exploring a potential ban on the import and sale of fur post-Brexit. This paper reviews public surveys on attitudes to fur farming in the UK from 1997 to 2021. It then reports the results of an online questionnaire to investigate in greater depth the beliefs of UK residents (n = 326) about the welfare of animals used in fur production, knowledge of the legal context of the fur trade and attitudes toward a ban on the import and sale of fur in the UK. A large majority (86%) of respondents believed that fur-farmed animals do not experience a good life. Over four-fifths (83%) disagreed that it is morally acceptable for the UK government to ban fur farming and yet continue to import and sell fur from producers overseas, with over three-quarters (78%) supporting a legal ban on the import and sale of fur in the UK.
BASE