Private International Law: Maintenance
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 307
ISSN: 1741-6191
257079 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 307
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 195
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 101
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 83
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 97
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 99
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 84
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 214
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Columbia journal of transnational law, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 415-429
ISSN: 0010-1931
In: American classics in international law Volume 1
The task -- Historical context and conditioning factors -- Traditional theories about international law - Natural law and legal positivism -- American legal realism -- International law as naked power -- The new haven school of jurisprudence -- International legal process and transnational legal process -- Liberal theories of international law -- Human rights and the concept of popular sovereignty -- Law & economics, public choice, and game theory -- New approaches to empirical scholarship in international law -- Critical legal studies, critical race theory, Latcrit, and Twail -- Critical theories on gender and sexual orientation
In: UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1112064
SSRN
Working paper
In: Nordic journal of international law, Band 84, Heft 3, S. 428-455
ISSN: 1571-8107
This article picks up on a term ('cross-fertilisation') often exploited in debates on the interaction of international laws and legal practices, especially in the context of international criminal law. Two questions are addressed: (1) What is the meaning of 'cross-fertilisation'? (2) What are its conditions? As the article argues, 'cross-fertilisation' pertains to the understanding of legal utterances relative to other such utterances. The concept assumes that if an agent wishes to understand the meaning or significance of a legal utterance, his understanding may profit by bringing the analysis of this utterance to bear on its assumed relationship with other legal utterances. Any assumption of a relationship between two legal utterances requires justification, however, or else it will not meet acceptance in international legal discourse. Consequently, when an agent brings the analysis of a legal utterance to bear on its relationship with some other legal utterance, as this article argues, cross-fertilisation will occur on two conditions. First, there has to be recognition of the relationship between the two utterances by a rule, principle, or informal convention pertinent to international legal discourse. Second, the agent must have grasped the precise nature of this same relationship. Based on this proposition, the article ends with six examples illustrating the kind of problems that might obstruct cross-fertilisation proper.
In: Studies in international law 9
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 57, S. 68-72
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Studies in international law volume 58