Decision Making in Jordan
In: Journal of Palestine studies, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 107-108
ISSN: 1533-8614
1769657 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Palestine studies, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 107-108
ISSN: 1533-8614
In: Administrative science quarterly: ASQ ; dedicated to advancing the understanding of administration through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 176-180
ISSN: 0001-8392
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 391-402
In: Orbis: FPRI's journal of world affairs, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 5-64
ISSN: 0030-4387
World Affairs Online
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 165
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Indian journal of public administration, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 601-609
ISSN: 2457-0222
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 31
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 415
In: International theory: a journal of international politics, law and philosophy, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 374-408
ISSN: 1752-9727
Deliberation has not only epistemic and moral value, it also has transformative value. Even if deliberation faces the problem of indeterminacy, it is assumed to have explanatory power. This article spells out why this is so and suggests a way to establish the causing effect of deliberation. It outlines a reason-based (RB) model of political decision-making applicable also to international affairs. By specifying a theory of argumentation on collective decision-making, we get to the nuts and bolts of deliberative decision-making, which, when supported by institutional powers, ensures a justified and well-grounded decision. The model contains a set of rules of inference and offers 'mechanismic' accounts of social events. It allows for explanations, but not predictions. The RB model conceives of decision-making as consisting of three sequences: claims-making, justification, and learning, each containing a set of explanatory mechanisms: values referring to conceptions of the common good, mandatory norms concerning the right thing to do, and evidence to the fact that non-compliance is wrong. The explanatory potential of this scheme is exemplified with reference to agreement making in the European Union. Some actors changed opinion voluntarily with regard to empowering the European parliament.
In: RIPON FORUM, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 12-13
In: The Western political quarterly: official journal of Western Political Science Association, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 53
ISSN: 0043-4078
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Band 179, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 1614-0559
In: Supervision: Mensch, Arbeit, Organisation : Zeitschrift für Beraterinnen und Berater, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 61-62
ISSN: 2699-2043
In: Decision Neuroscience, S. 149-162