Some Recent Books on International Relations
In: Foreign affairs, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 692
ISSN: 0015-7120
2713489 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Foreign affairs, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 692
ISSN: 0015-7120
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 302
ISSN: 0022-197X
In: Routledge/UACES contemporary European studies series, 8
"Offering a different stance from most of the current literature on the subject, International Actors, Democratization and the Rule of Law makes an important contribution to our knowledge of the international dimensions of democratization. This book will be of importance to scholars, students and policy-makers with an interest in the rule of law, international relations theory and comparative politics."--Jacket
In: Politique étrangère: revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Band Hiver, Heft 4, S. 1059-1071
ISSN: 1958-8992
Résumé Le facteur religieux n'est pas bienvenu dans les sciences sociales occidentales, et en particulier dans les théories des relations internationales. La sécularisation du xxe siècle n'a pourtant nullement fait disparaître le religieux : elle a provoqué son adaptation à un nouvel environnement. Le facteur religieux réapparaît aujourd'hui largement, invitant les théories des relations internationales à le réintégrer, en particulier dans leur analyse des dynamiques conflictuelles.
In: Uluslararasi Hukuk ve Politika, Band 8, Heft 29, S. 143-160
In: Uluslararasi Hukuk ve Politika, Band 8, Heft 29
In: International interactions: empirical and theoretical research in international relations, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 63-86
ISSN: 1547-7444
In: Politique étrangère: PE ; revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 721-722
ISSN: 0032-342X
In: Cambridge studies in international relations, 132
"Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States enjoys unparalleled military power. The international system is therefore unipolar. A quarter century later, however, we still possess no theory of unipolarity. Theory of Unipolar Politics provides one. Dr. Nuno P. Monteiro answers three of the most important questions about the workings of a unipolar world. Is it durable? Is it peaceful? What is the best grand strategy a unipolar power such as the contemporary United States can implement? In our nuclear world, the power preponderance of the United States is potentially durable but likely to produce frequent conflict. Furthermore, in order to maintain its power preponderance, the United States must remain militarily engaged in the world and accommodate the economic growth of its major competitors, namely, China. This strategy, however, will lead Washington to wage war frequently. In sum, military power preponderance brings significant benefits but is not an unalloyed good"--
World Affairs Online
In: Global constitutionalism: human rights, democracy and the rule of law, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 169-182
ISSN: 2045-3825
Abstract:In their ground-breaking philosophical investigation of the 'practice turn' Lechner and Frost prompt a standpoint debate in international relations theory, which touches upon the relationship between practice theory and its subject matter. Lechner and Frost decidedly opt for an internal standpoint, which promises to understand a social practice in terms of the meaning-in-use of its participants. This article argues that the internalist promise will ultimately remain unfulfilled, however, for the aim of collapsing the distinction between the 'language of action' and 'language of observation' is epistemologically impossible. Taking such an 'internal' perspective not only underestimates the problem of the double hermeneutic. It also disregards the gap between theory and practice. Any social enquiry that fails to acknowledge this gap inevitably becomes externalist, for it misses to reflect on its own normative presuppositions. The way ahead is to address this gap reflexively by way of a triple hermeneutics that is bolstered by abductive reasoning.
In: China policy series, 23
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 129-134
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: International organization, Band 70, Heft 4, S. 845-869
ISSN: 1531-5088
AbstractGeographic Information Systems (GIS) are being applied with increasing frequency, and with increasing sophistication, in international relations and in political science more generally. Their benefits have been impressive: analyses that simply would not have been possible without GIS are now being completed, and the spatial component of international politics—long considered central but rarely incorporated analytically—has been given new emphasis. However, new methods face new challenges, and to apply GIS successfully, two specific issues need to be addressed: measurement validity and selection bias. Both relate to the challenge of conceptualizing nonspatial phenomena with the spatial tools of GIS. Significant measurement error can occur when the concepts that are coded as spatial variables are not, in fact, validly measured by the default data structure of GIS, and selection bias can arise when GIS systematically excludes certain types of units. Because these potential problems are hidden by the technical details of the method, GIS data sets and analyses can sometimes appear to overcome these challenges when, in fact, they fail to do so. Once these issues come to light, however, potential solutions become apparent—including some in existing applications in international relations and in other fields.
In: The new international relations