Suchergebnisse

Unter den vielen positiven Aspekten, die mit internationaler Mobilität assoziiert werden, ist der Wissenstransfer besonders wichtig. Möglich ist dies u. a. über international mobile Forschende, die als Wissensvermittelnde fungieren können, indem sie relevantes Wissen im Ausland erwerben und es in ihr Heimatland transferieren. Es ist jedoch wenig darüber bekannt, wie und welches Wissen übertragen wird, da es an Methoden mangelt, dies zu belegen. In diesem Beitrag wird zum einen das Potenzial bibliometrischer Analysen aufgezeigt, die für die Erfassung des Wissenstransfers international mobiler Forschender entwickelt worden sind. Die bibliometrischen Methoden greifen hierfür auf Autorennetzwerke, Zitationsnetzwerke und lexikalische Verfahren zurück, u. a. zur Bestimmung selten gebrauchter Begriffskombinationen, die explizite Wissensinhalte repräsentieren. Zum anderen werden die mit diesen Methoden gewonnenen Ergebnisse vorgestellt, darunter exemplarisch das im Ausland erworbene Wissen von Forschenden.

In 2021 the international climate policy agenda will need to catch up on much that was not accomplished in 2020. Because of the pandemic, deadlines were postponed and processes slowed down. What is the position of major climate policy powers in early 2021, and what momentum can we expect for international negotiations? The most important impetus this year will come from the EU, the US and China. However, since these three powers are also competitors, the EU and its member states will have to strengthen multilateral cooperation overall so as to push for reaching the Paris Agreement targets, formulate clear expectations, and ensure that all actors remain on equal terms. For Germany and the EU it will therefore be crucial to continue to focus decisively on joint action with partner countries within networks, and to concentrate on core issues with the US. Obvious areas for cooperation with Washington are a joint diplomatic approach for the next international climate conference (COP26), and rec­on­ciling climate and trade policy. (author's abstract)

The Asian Yearbook of International Law is the first publication dedicated primarily to international law as seen from an Asian perspective. It provides international law articles written by experts from the region and other articles relating to Asian topics. The editorial board, national correspondents, advisory council, and governing board comprise a diverse group of academics and government officials from a wide range of countries and positions. The Asian Yearbook of International Law offers a number of useful features: - articles; - notes; - legal materials (such as the state practice in a number of Asian countries and participation in multilateral treaties); - Asia and international organizations; - chronicle of events for the covered year; - literature (including book reviews and a bibliography); - selected documents (treaties, agreements, and other relevant primary documents); and - an index. Its range of features assures that the Yearbook comprehensively covers the critical events, legislation, and issues of the past year and that users can easily access all of this information. Academics and practitioners who deal with international public law in Asia will appreciate this unique, complete resource. The Asian Yearbook of International Law provides insight into Asian views and practices, especially for non-Asian readers, and also promotes the dissemination of knowledge of international law in Asia. Some of the topics covered in this volume: recent trends in the jurisprudence of the international court of justice and international arbitral tribunals, with special reference to territorial and boundary cases; an environmental regime for the arctic and the antarctic analogy; Philippine civil procedure in transboundary disputes; international civil procedure in Indonesia and Japan; and transboundary civil litigation in Korea

The International Criminal Court's (ICC) supposed 'neo-colonialism' has been the focus of much discussion based on the fact that the Court's Prosecutor has been almost exclusively interested in cases dealing with the African continent. This paper will try to go beyond the issue of a neo-colonialism as seen exclusively through a critique of the over-representation of African indictees. It argues that if there is a form of neo-colonialism at work it is down to more subtle post-colonial treatment of Africa through the categories of international criminal justice. One needs to situate the relationship between international criminal justice and Africa within a 'temps long' of the introduction of modern penal thought and practices on the continent from colonization to the construction of the post-colonial state, particularly as seen in the exclusion/instrumentalization/hybridization of forms of traditional justice. Adapted from the source document.

Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- About the Author -- Abbreviations -- Part I Part One -- 1 Introduction -- References -- 2 Global Value Chains in the Post-pandemic Era -- 2.1 The Key Roles of Global Value Chains in Global Development -- 2.1.1 Boosting Economic Growth -- 2.1.2 Increasing Employment Opportunities -- 2.1.3 Strengthening Economic Ties -- 2.1.4 Influencing International Rules -- 2.2 The Problems of Global Value Chains in the Pre-pandemic Era -- 2.2.1 Over-Concentration of Regional Distribution -- 2.2.2 Promotion of High-Tech Development -- 2.2.3 Interference of Trade Protectionism -- 2.2.4 Impacts of Imbalance in the Distribution of Benefits -- 2.3 The Severe Challenges Facing Global Value Chains in the Post-pandemic Era -- 2.3.1 Overall Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic -- 2.3.2 A More Fragmented Production Layout -- 2.3.3 New Problems Brought by Digital Governance -- 2.3.4 Rise of De-Globalization Sentiment -- 2.4 Global Value Chains' Calling for the Reconstruction and Innovation of International Rules -- 2.4.1 Innovating International Rules -- 2.4.2 Adhering to Open Rules -- 2.4.3 Fair Competition Rules -- 2.4.4 Digital Economy Rules -- 2.4.5 Strengthening the Rule System -- References -- 3 The Reconstruction and Innovation of International Economic and Trade Rules -- 3.1 The Practical Needs for the Reconstruction and Innovation of International Economic and Trade Rules -- 3.1.1 The New International Trade and Economy Landscape Requires Reconstructing International Economic and Trade Rules -- 3.1.2 The Emerging Economic Mode Calls for the Innovation of International Economic and Trade Rules -- 3.1.3 Trade Protectionism Necessitates the Reconstruction of International Economic and Trade Rules -- 3.1.4 The COVID-19 Pandemic has Accelerated the Reconstruction of International Economic and Trade Rules.