Suchergebnisse

Maskoliunaite, A.: Defintion of terrorism. Problems and approaches. - S. 11-25. Racius, E.: Sacred violence: in search for justification of violence in the holy texts. - S.26-40. Jokubaitis, A.: Postmodernism and politics. - S. 43-52. Norkus, Z.: Academic sience and democracy. - S. 53-90. Nakrosis, V.; Vilipisauskas, R.: Implementation of public policy in Lithuania. Europeanization through the "weakest link". - S. 93-112. Brozaitis, H.: Dismantling political-administration nexus in Lithuania. - S. 113-127. ... Maniokas, K.: Concept of Europeanisation and its place in the theories of the European integration. - S. 159-180

Eidintas, A.: A "Jew-Communist" stereotype in Lithuania, 1940-1941. - S. 11-46. Jokubaitis, A.: Stasys Salkauskis and Antanas Maceina as political philosophers. - S. 47-65. Vinogradnaite, I.: The image of political community in Lithuania: the salience of nationality as a criterion of membership. - S. 66-77. Degutis, M.: How Lithuanian voters decide: reasons behind the party choice. - S. 81-123. Clark, T.; Prekevicius, N.: The effect of changes to the electoral law in premier-presidential systems: the Lithuanian case. - S. 124-137. Novagrockiene, J.: Elections to the Seimas 2000. Party system evolution or its transformation? - S. 138-150. Lukosaitis, A.: The context of parliamentary elections 2000. The experience and perspectives of coalition politics in Lithuania. - S. 151-176. Nakrosis, V.: Evolution of the administrative accountability system in Lithuania. - S. 179-194. Lopata, R.; Laurinavicius, C.: Russia's military reform: political trajectories. - S. 197-210. Sirutavicius, V.: Lithuanian-Polish strategic partnership: genesis and prospects. - S. 211-216. Stanyte-Tolockiene, I.: Kaliningrad Oblast in the context of EU enlargement. - S. 217-249. Satuniene, Z.: Political economy of Lithuania's membership in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). - S. 250-273

Political scientists during the last 20 years have been bombarded by a bewildering array of approaches and methods to the study of their discipline, including structural-functionalism, systems and partial systems, decision-making, costs and benefits, patron-client relationships, micro-politics, politimetrics, mobilisation systems, survey research, aggregate data and content analysis, Q methodology, and experimentalism. With so many different approaches and techniques available to students of politics, it is not surprising that the discipline is in a twilight period characterised by confusion and disillusionment.