Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
222132 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Remedies in International Dispute Settlement
SSRN
Working paper
World History and the Evolving International Judiciary
In: APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
Initiation of Investigations and Selection of Cases
In: TOWARDS CODIFICATION OF GENERAL RULES AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, Goran Sluiter, ed., Oxford University Press, 2012
SSRN
Climate Change Litigation: Opening the Door to the International Court of Justice
In: Adjudicating Climate Change: State, National, and International Approaches. Ed. William C. G. Burns & Hari Osofsky. Cambridge University Press, 2009
SSRN
Courts as Coordinators: Endogenous Enforcement and Jurisdiction in International Adjudication
In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2012, Vol. 56 (2): pp. 257-289.
SSRN
Financial Interdictions to Curb Proliferation
In: Arms control today, Band 42, Heft 6, S. 21-27
ISSN: 0196-125X
Gouvernance Internet: tensions actuelles et futurs possibles
In: Politique étrangère: PE ; revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Heft 2
ISSN: 0032-342X
Internet has become a major issue in international relations. The debate concerning its governance shows the opposition between two main governance structures. One of which is governance organized around national sovereignty or interstate multilateralism. The other, a multi-stakeholder approach, is broadly inclusive to all civil society actors. New governance can only arise after the elimination of the over-simplistic debates that have appropriated the terms of a "new Cold War". Adapted from the source document.
El futuro de la gobernanza medioambiental internacional (The Future of International Environmental Governance)
In: Revista de Derecho Ambiental, Band 32, Heft 2012
SSRN
Politics, Wealth, and the Law of Nations: Morgenthau, Smith, and Post-Jurisprudential Disciplinarity
SSRN
Working paper
Protecting foreign investments against expropriation: a comparative study of Japan's EPAs
Expropriation is the most traditional type of political risk. However, there is no consistency in the protection against expropriation according to international jurisprudence. This paper analyses what constitutes expropriation and the conditions of non-compensable takings, as well as examining what international tribunals require in order to accept a claim of expropriation. Moreover, the paper highlights the evolved role of the FET standard in successfully supporting claims that under expropriation, clauses are likely to be rejected. As case study, this paper analyses recent EPAs (2006-2009) entered into force between Japan and five ASEAN member-countries. It develops quantitative measures (a score card) to provide several snapshots of key legal elements for the protection of foreign investments in the power sector in each of the countries. In comparing the five EPAs, it is found that the power sector is reserved to a different extent with regards to expropriation and FET standards.
BASE
Resolving International Dispute: The Role of Courts
In: New Zealand international review, Band 36, Heft 1
ISSN: 0110-0262
The Rise of Transnational Crime: International Cooperation, State Contributions, and the Role of the Global Political Economy
In: International studies review, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 316-319
ISSN: 1468-2486
The Global Challenge of Child Labour: Going for the Goal
In: World of work: the magazine of the ILO, Heft 69
ISSN: 1020-0010
Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes
In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Band 54(1), S. 5-38
SSRN