The Production and Placement of Political Science Ph.D.s, 1902–2000
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 361-366
This paper is the second of a three-part series dealing with
quantitative indicators of impact and prominence in the political science
discipline. In these essays, we assess some of the changes in the
discipline since the publication of the Somit and Tanenhaus (1963; 1964; 1967) studies that cover the first 60 years of the
twentieth century. In the first paper of the series, published in the
January 2007 issue of PS (Masuoka, Grofman, and Feld 2007), we focused on the individual visibility and
impact of all regular faculty in Ph.D.-granting departments by using
SSCI-based cumulative citation counts to their lifetime work. In
particular, we identified the 400 most-cited faculty members in the
discipline, and we found that citation counts are strongly influenced by
factors such as date of Ph.D., subfield, and gender. This, the second
paper in the series, shifts to departmental-level data and details the
historical changes in Ph.D. production and placement rates from
1902–2000. The last paper in the series, to be published in the July
2007 issue of PS, will combine the individual-level citation data
presented in the first paper with the Ph.D. production and placement data
in the second paper to look at the factors that affect reputational
rankings of Ph.D.-granting political science departments. The authors would like to thank Russell Dalton,
Lee Sigelman, and the anonymous reviewers of PS for their helpful
feedback and corrections. We are also indebted to the bibliographic
assistance of Clover Behrend-Gethard and to the inspiration of Joe
Tanenhaus' pioneering work. Any errors presented in this paper are
the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors welcome corrections to
the data that is presented in this series. Comments and corrections can be
sent to Bgrofman@uci.edu.