Godfather of the European Union: Altiero Spinelli
In: European business review, Band 98, Heft 2, S. 135-135
ISSN: 1758-7107
1578591 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European business review, Band 98, Heft 2, S. 135-135
ISSN: 1758-7107
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 2, Heft 3, S. i-ii
ISSN: 2399-5548
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1478-2790
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 355-356
ISSN: 1478-2790
In: Journal of contemporary European studies, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 64-80
ISSN: 1478-2790
In: Journal of European social policy, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 283-284
ISSN: 1461-7269
In: European Journal of Political Economy, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 707-737
In: South African journal of international affairs: journal of the South African Institute of International Affairs, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 582-584
ISSN: 1938-0275
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 68, Heft 2, S. 403-404
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 637-709
ISSN: 0165-0750
Method of taxation of cigarettes in the European Union brings also many negative effects except stable budgetary income, it discourages from harmful consumption or it takes into account the social costs of smoking. Except value added tax also excise composed of part of specific tax and part of ad valorem tax is there imposed on cigarettes. This causes a significant multiplication distorting the market and impacting the consumers in the case of an increase in the costs of producers of cigarettes. The mechanism of calculation of taxes imposed on cigarettes also causes a creation of a duty to pay taxes on taxes. The significant fact is that indicators measuring these effects between 1995 and 2008 are growing or at least are not declining and neither probable future regulation of harmonization of the taxation of cigarettes in the European Union brings any reparation of the given situation. Taxation of cigarettes is not generally transparent, the rate of taxation is based on inconsistent bases and objectives that should be achieved and probably they are not the priority for many countries of the European Union.
BASE
In: European security, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 385-387
ISSN: 1746-1545
In: European access: the current awareness bulletin to the policies and activities of the European Communities, Heft 6, S. 22-23
ISSN: 0264-7362, 1362-458X
In: Giumelli , F , Hoffmann , F & Ksiazczakova , A 2021 , ' The when, what, where and why of European Union sanctions ' , European Security , vol. 30 , no. 1 , pp. 1-23 . https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1797685 ; ISSN:0966-2839
The decisions to impose sanctions on Russia and to lift them on Iran, in opposition to the wishes of the United States, contributed to the elevation of the profile of the European Union among the main global actors in international politics. However, the EU imposes sanctions since the spring of 1994, shortly after the entry into force of the Treaty of Maastricht. Even though the EU consequently has 26 years of experience herewith, EU sanctions have been mostly studied only on a case-by-case basis. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of the experience of the EU with sanctions. Specifically, it presents the results of a newly constructed database of EU autonomous sanctions constituted by 48 cases of these restrictive measures, which have been subdivided in 85 episodes. The analysis revolves around four questions that we asked in each case: when sanctions were in force, what type(s) were used, where the targets were located and why restrictive measures were imposed. The analysis of the empirical database leads to observations about the EU as an international actor and, more generally, on the trends vis-a-vis the utilisation of sanctions as a foreign policy instrument.
BASE