This paper attempts to use network theory, drawn from recent work in sociology, engineering, and biological systems, to suggest that the current crisis should be viewed as a network crisis. The author surveys the concepts of networks, their defining characteristics, applications to financial markets, and the need for supervision and implications for national and global governance. Then, author briefly examines the current financial crisis in the light of the network analysis and surveys the recent reforms in financial regulation and architecture. The paper concludes with an analysis of the policy implications of network analysis.
In the private sector, outsourcing has become a recognized feature of the business scene. While there are various reasons for contracting out functions to external organizations, in general the justification relates to the potential cost-benefit from adopting this approach. This study set out to ascertain whether the same considerations applied to administrative procedures associated with starting a business. Did business registries outsource any or all of their functions? If so, did the same considerations apply as for the private sector? Were there lessons to be learned from their experience? Responses to these and other questions were received from 53 registries. This paper is not about global commerce, at least, not in the usual sense. It is about some of the more mundane administrative procedures that underpin the activities of the private sector, the basics that help it to function. Business registration is seen as a key factor in determining the investment climate of a country.
Amid heightened global uncertainties, Russia is experiencing a bumpy recovery. Domestic demand is rising, but unemployment remains high, and credit and investment remain limited. The budget has benefited from higher oil prices, but fiscal consolidation remains important in the medium term. Crumbling infrastructure, especially in transport, could hamper the economy's competitiveness and longer-term growth prospects. The debt crisis in Western Europe sharpens the downside risks to global recovery and oil prices. But the effects on Russia are likely to be blunted by its stronger fiscal and debt positions and by limited trade and financial links with the affected countries. Russia is likely to grow by 4.5 percent in 2010, followed by 4.8 percent in 2011, as domestic demand expands in line with gradual improvements in the labor and credit markets. Employment is expected to improve gradually, however, enabling some further reductions in poverty.
How hospitable will the global environment be for economic growth in the developing world as we come out of the present financial crisis? The answer depends on how well the author manage the following tension. On the one hand, global macro stability requires that we prevent external imbalances from getting too large. On the other hand, growth in poor nations requires that the world economy be able to absorb a rapid increase in the supply of tradable produced in the developing world. It is possible to render these two requirements compatible, but doing so requires greater use of explicit industrial policies in developing countries, which have the potential of encouraging of modern tradable activities without spilling over into trade surpluses. The 'price' to be paid for greater discipline on real exchange rates and external imbalances is greater use (and permissiveness) towards industrial polices.
After stagnating for much of its postcolonial history, economic performance in Sub?Saharan Africa has markedly improved. Since 1995, average economic growth has been close to 5 percent per year. Has Africa finally turned the corner? This paper analyzes growth accelerations and decelerations-that is, country level deviations from long?run trend growth. Seen from this perspective, Africa's record of slow and volatile growth reflects a pattern of offsetting accelerations and declines, and much of the improvement in economic performance in Africa post 1995 turns out to be due to a substantial reduction in the frequency and severity of growth decelerations. The fall in economic declines since 1995 is largely due to better macroeconomic policies, but changes in such 'growth determinants' as investment, export diversification, and productivity have not accompanied the growth boom. Lack of change in these variables and the significant role played by natural resources in sparking growth accelerations suggest that Africa's growth recovery was fragile, even before the recent global economic crisis. The paper concludes by setting out four elements of a strategy that can help move Africa from fewer mistakes to sustained growth: managing natural resources better, pushing nontraditional exports, building the African private sector, and creating new skills.
After stagnating for much of its postcolonial history, economic performance in Sub?Saharan Africa has markedly improved. Since 1995, average economic growth has been close to 5 percent per year. Has Africa finally turned the corner? This paper analyzes growth accelerations and decelerations-that is, country level deviations from long?run trend growth. Seen from this perspective, Africa's record of slow and volatile growth reflects a pattern of offsetting accelerations and declines, and much of the improvement in economic performance in Africa post 1995 turns out to be due to a substantial reduction in the frequency and severity of growth decelerations. The fall in economic declines since 1995 is largely due to better macroeconomic policies, but changes in such 'growth determinants' as investment, export diversification, and productivity have not accompanied the growth boom. Lack of change in these variables and the significant role played by natural resources in sparking growth accelerations suggest that Africa's growth recovery was fragile, even before the recent global economic crisis. The paper concludes by setting out four elements of a strategy that can help move Africa from fewer mistakes to sustained growth: managing natural resources better, pushing nontraditional exports, building the African private sector, and creating new skills.
This study begins by considering the banking sector and then moves on to issues relating to improving access to finance to support Nigeria's economic growth vision. The second part of the study refers to issues relating to longer-term finance: both the sources of financing, such as pensions and insurance, and their uses in providing financing for resolving Nigeria's crucial infrastructure shortfalls in infrastructure and housing. The final part of the study returns to the fundamental 'plumbing' of the financial system focusing on the legal and regulatory foundation for creditor rights and corporate insolvency, instituting sound corporate governance standards for corporations and banks, and providing secure and low cost transmittal of payments and remittances. While it is difficult to identify a common theme running through this volume without compromising the diversity and nuance of the recommendations, the overarching theme supported by this volume is the importance of exchange of reliable information as the basis for financial transactions between unconnected third parties. Implementation of systems designed to strengthen accounting and reporting standards for banks and corporations, the registration of movable and immovable property, property liens and credit histories as well as exchange of information about prices, interest rates, fees and charges for financials services will considerably enhance the functionality of financial systems and prove crucial in establishing a trusted and robust market-based financial system in support of stable economic growth and development in Nigeria.
The subprime mortgage crisis ranks among the most serious economic events affecting the United States since the great depression of the 1930s. This study analyzes key issues raised by the crisis at three levels: (i) issues directly and specifically relating to subprime mortgage lending; (ii) issues relating to the securitization of subprime mortgages; and (iii) issues affecting financial markets and institutions. These issues are fundamental to risk bearing, sharing, and transfer in financial markets and institutions around the world. Many of the issues raised by the U.S. subprime crisis also apply to high-risk loan markets in developing countries. The framework applied in the paper analyzes subprime mortgage lending as a major financial market innovation. Although conditions were conducive for subprime lending to arise as a financial innovation, financial innovations are necessarily risky undertakings, all the more so when they create new classes of risky loans and securities. The lessons learned from the crisis can thus be usefully applied to issues of the growth and development of emerging economies, as well as pointing the way to the design of new and efficient policies for subprime lending in the developed economies.
La importancia de esta investigación se plantea desde la estrategia de comunicación para la ejecución de un proyecto de diseño de mediana complejidad para el mercado digital, como elemento fundamental para plantear el diseño de estrategias de comunicación y análisis de datos, que se ajusten a las necesidades y el presupuesto de la empresa.
Partiendo desde un análisis del mercado en la comparación de precios, diseño web, estrategias de comercialización y publicidad que permitan a emprendimientos y pequeñas empresas conseguir llegar a nuevos mercados evitando intermediarios.El poder llegar directamente a sus clientes en el mercado de usuarios de internet le permitan analizar y buscar los estímulos en el proceso compra, tratando de entender la configuración mental o el comportamiento de compra de los usuarios a través de la experiencia con la comunicación e interacción en el sitio web.
El proceso de compra por internet a cambiado la relación con el mercado tradicional de venta de productos y servicios, dando una nueva dinámica a las relaciones de las personas en el manejo de los medios de comunicación y los comportamientos de consumo ofrecidos por el desarrollo constante de la tecnología aplicada en internet, con la facilidad de comunicación que dan estas interfaces necesarias para el desempeño de las empresas y los usuarios en sus interfaces auto gestionadas como los correos electrónicos, buscadores, redes sociales y portales de comercialización.
El capítulo uno hace una introducción al fenómeno de la sociedad de la información y la manera como se está gestionando los procesos tecnológicos con el desarrollo macro estructural de la empresas al nivel de los factores externos que puedan influenciar su rendimiento.
El segundo capítulo se trabaja sobre el micro entorno, donde se definen los conceptos y diferencias entre la publicidad tradicional y publicidad en internet, profundizando en los espacios publicitarios que brinda internet a sus anunciantes y la capacidad de segmentación que brindan al poder medir el comportamientos de los usuarios en internet.
El capítulo tres busca documentar el fenómeno de las nuevas plataformas de comunicación en internet y la diferenciación de la publicidad tradicional, definiendo el uso dado a cada una de estas plataformas utilizadas en internet, detallando cuales son las más sobresalientes en el mercado online en este caso el elección de buscador Google con respecto a los otros medios como: las redes sociales, foros, plataformas de comercio. Analizando el uso que hace el internauta argentino de estos medios online en cuanto acceso a internet, consumo de medios, comercio electrónico y la diferenciación en la identidad adquirida de la publicidad tradicional con respecto a la publicidad online.
El capítulo cuarto es la investigación por medio de entrevistas realizada a los especialistas del proyecto de cuentas nuevas de Google AdWords, especialista en el desarrollo de PYMES y especialistas en estrategias de publicidad, documentando el comportamiento del marketing online en el surgimiento del consumo de la publicidad online en Buenos Aires Argentina, como parte fundamental del diagnóstico.
En el quinto capítulo se analiza la publicidad como medio de comercialización para PYMES y su capacidad de innovación y mejoramiento de productos y servicios en los procesos de comercialización al llegar cliente de forma directa. Se analiza el fenómeno del nuevo concepto de marketing digital creado por Google donde el usuario recibe estímulos publicitarios que lo llevan a tomar la decisión de compra, la diferenciación de estrategias de posicionamiento y comunicación orgánica y patrocinada en Google AdWords y en la red de YouTube. Se diseña un Plan estratégico para la aplicación de publicidad patrocinada a una estrategia de posicionamiento en motores de búsqueda para las PYME, por medio de un caso real de éxito de una PYME en Bogotá-Colombia.
Además, se muestra el seguimiento de las campañas de Google AdWords y los distintos tipos de estrategias y análisis que se puede lograr con las herramientas diseñadas para la optimización de sitios web y campañas de Google AdWords, al igual que la capacidad del diseño de las estrategias de comunicación en móviles y en el seguimiento de posibles clientes con estrategias de publicidad en Remarketing.
El periodo escogido para esta investigación fluctúa entre el año 2011 al 2013, periodo donde se identifica parte de la creación de la operación tercerizada de Google y el análisis de estudios que versan sobre el crecimiento de la publicidad online de Internet en Buenos Aires.Estado del arte
Cabe destacar que uno de los antecedentes más interesantes para comprender el auge de la publicidad en Buenos Aires reside en la elección de Argentina como país presidente de la Comisión Interamericana de Ciencia y Tecnología durante el período de 2008 al 2009, el país propone y coordina proyectos y actividades de cooperación entre países miembros. Para esto, se recogen estudios e índices que se vinculen con el uso y desarrollo del Internet, y tras el análisis de esos estudios, se comparan con los índices de otros países latinoamericanos, pese a la minuciosidad del trabajo, aun no existe ningún estudio que establezca la dinámica mediante la cual las PYMES se relaciona con las plataformas de publicidad online. Por esta razón, se decidió realizar una investigación que realice un análisis del uso de la plataforma auto gestionada Google AdWords por parte de las PYMES en la ciudad de Buenos Aires durante el período 2011-2013.
Dados los fines de investigación del fenómeno de la publicidad online, el estudio se enfocará en un estudio aplicado a especialistas que se vinculen con la operación que realiza la Agencia Atento para Google desde el año 2011 en Argentina. Este estudio se reforzará con una entrevista de preguntas abiertas, tomando una muestra del marcado y considerará a un grupo de ambos géneros, mayores de 18 años y que residen en la capital porteña. Las entrevistas tendrán como finalidad encontrar el público más idóneo con el manejo de la plataforma de Google AdWords y cómo ésta se vincula con las PYMES.
A su vez, este trabajo se ubica dentro de las líneas Temáticas de nuevas tecnologías, medios y estrategias de comunicación, identificando la importancia que tienen éstas en la cotidianeidad gracias a las innovaciones creativas que introducen al área del diseño y la comunicación como herramientas de trabajo que permiten explorar otros lenguajes, que aportan a la renovación de los modelos organizativos de las empresas, junto con movilizar la dinámica del consumo de bienes y servicios.
De esta forma, se puede indicar que el tema de esta investigación nace a partir de una inquietud natural de todo aquel que ya se siente preparado para enfrentar el mundo profesional del diseño y considerarlo desde otros puntos de vistas, como la creación de planes estratégicos que contribuyan al desarrollo de nuevos campos del conocimiento.
Así, se puede precisar que, tras una vinculación laboral dentro del desarrollo de la publicidad online, esta investigación ha logrado identificar la necesidad de analizar el uso que hacen las PYMES de la publicidad online como un medio de comunicación auto gestionado a través de interfaces virtuales que le permiten crear y medir su propia comunicación, por medio de una planificación estratégica a nivel de los medios tradicionales de comunicación que permita sopesar las altas inversiones que requiere la publicidad tradicional en televisión, radio, revistas y prensa, supliendo la necesidad de comunicación con interfaces que le permiten personalizar la comunicación segmento de mercado hacia el cual se dirige sus productos o servicios.Teniendo en cuenta las herramientas precisas y desarrollando una planificación inteligente y perspicaz, se logra un impacto mayor, que deriva en un crecimiento económico para la empresa en cuestión. De esta forma, se desea exponer los beneficios que ha tenido el uso de Internet para generar una dinámica de consumo que permita un crecimiento rentable y sostenible.Aspectos metodológicos
El proyecto aplica el método de investigación descriptivo, porque examina las características del problema escogido, se definen y formulan las hipótesis y los procesos adaptados, por medio del diagnóstico del comportamiento de las PYMES respecto a la publicidad online, por medio de entrevistas a funcionarios, desde 2 puntos de vista, el de las agencia Atento Google quienes conocen a fondo la realidad de las necesidades y problemas de las PYME y desde el punto de vista del director de desarrollo y PYMES de la Bolsa de Comercio de Buenos Aires. El proyecto busca el porqué de los hechos mediante el establecimiento de relaciones causa-efecto. En este sentido, se analizan los efectos del diagnóstico, como los efectos de la investigación experimental realizada en las entrevistas, presentación del caso y del plan estratégico para probar la hipótesis. Sus resultados y conclusiones constituyen el nivel más profundo de conocimientos.
Incluye la explicación del problema y la deducción de los resultados de las entrevistas y el diseño del plan estratégico como solución tanto a las PYME como a los profesionales en diseño y comunicación en manejo de campañas online en Google Adwords.Hipótesis
La hipótesis propone que el uso de Google AdWords tuvo un crecimiento sostenido por parte de las PYMES de la Buenos Aires Argentina entre el año 2011 y 2013, con bajo rendimiento en los resultados esperados respecto a su inversión en campañas publicitarias, debido a la falta de capacitación en el uso de la interfaz Google AdWords, de conocimiento en la segmentación del público objetivo y la falta de seguimiento y control de las campañas publicitarias online, por lo anterior se formula la siguiente pregunta: ¿Cómo incorporan las PYMES en la ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, las exigencias que han surgido con las nuevas formas tecnológicas de publicidad en internet y específicamente en el caso de Google AdWords? En este sentido, la hipótesis de esta investigación se basa en el gran crecimiento que tuvo el uso de Google AdWords por parte de las PYMES de Buenos Aires, pero que obtuvo bajo rendimiento en los resultados esperados respecto a su inversión en campañas publicitarias. Así, esta investigación considera esta relación inversamente proporcional, debido a la falta de capacitación en el uso de la herramienta Google AdWords, en la falta de conocimiento de la segmentación del público objetivo y la falta de seguimiento y control de las campañas publicitarias online.Objetivo general
Como objetivo general se busca analizar el comportamiento publicitario online de las PYMES en Buenos Aires Argentina a través de la herramienta Google AdWords, durante el periodo 2011-2013.Objetivos específicos
Los objetivos específicos proponen indagar las ventajas y desventajas comparativas que ofrece Google AdWords para los diferentes clientes PYMES frente a otros sistemas de publicidad online; analizar las formas de segmentación de las plataformas publicitarias online y las utilizadas por Google AdWords para promocionar los productos y servicios de la PYMES; conocer las dificultades más frecuentes y los modelos de capacitación que tuvieron los PYMES de Buenos Aires Argentina en el uso de Google AdWords; diagnosticar el Micro y Macro entorno de las Pymes de Buenos Aires - Argentina en el uso de la publicidad online; y diseñar un plan estratégico de diseño y comunicación para que las Pymes puedan aplicar la plataforma Google AdWords de una forma fácil y estructurada, con el fin que tanto las Pymes como los profesionales con maestría en Diseño y Comunicación puedan implementarlo, por medio de un caso de éxito.Antecedentes
Para efectos de esta investigación, se tiene en cuenta que la herramienta de Google AdWords es un medio de comunicación y publicidad online nuevo en el mercado Latinoamericano, ya que es países como España y Estados Unidos, tienen procesos de comercialización por internet avanzados y a gran escala. Por esto, para el caso en Buenos Aires Argentina se realiza un análisis desde los inicios de los años 90s, donde un grupo de físicos encabezado por Tim Berners-Lee creó el lenguaje HTML y luego el WWW -Word Wide Web- y generó nuevas facilidades de interconexión y herramientas gráficas amigables. Han pasado casi 22 años y la importancia de las TIC's (tecnologías de la información y la comunicación) es cada vez mayor, incluyendo el desarrollo en las redes sociales, que parte desde los diferentes procesos de manejo de la información en su producción, circulación y utilización, que se ha basado en diferentes conocimientos científicos, empíricos, subjetivos, prácticas sociales e instrumentalismo acerca del desarrollo de la información y la comunicación en la realidad, política, cultural y económica desde un contexto social tecnológico, en el cual se encuentran la información con la comunicación.
Manuel Castells afirma que "La Era de la Información" es nuestra era (Castell, 2007): "Es un periodo histórico caracterizado por una revolución tecnológica centrada en las tecnologías digitales de información y comunicación, concomitante, pero no causante, con la emergencia de una estructura social en red, en todos los ámbitos de la actividad humana, y con la interdependencia global de dicha actividad. Es un proceso de transformación multidimensional que es a la vez incluyente y excluyente en función de los valores e intereses dominantes en cada proceso, en cada país y en cada organización social. Como todo proceso de transformación histórica, la era de la información no determina un curso único de la historia humana; sus consecuencias, sus características dependen del poder de quienes se benefician en cada una de las múltiples opciones que se presentan a la voluntad humana. Pero la ideología tecnocrática futurológica trata de presentar la revolución tecnológica, la ley del mercado, se refuerza la una a la otra. En ambos casos, desaparece la sociedad como proceso autónomo de decisión en función de los intereses y valores de sus miembros, sometidos a las fuerzas externas del mercado y la tecnología".Internet se convierte en un fenómeno masivo a nivel mundial donde se crea un gigantesco centro comercial virtual, de tiendas que están abiertas las 24 horas del día, 7 días a la semana, 365 días al año, que permiten el libre acceso de todas las personas que tengas acceso a la red. Existen tiendas que venden de todo: productos, servicios, ideas, creencias, contactos, en fin es un centro comercial donde sólo algunos clientes saben a qué tienda van, mientras que la mayoría, para no perderse, pide ayuda en un stand a la entrada que dice "buscadores". (Ordozgoiti, 2010, p. 17)Este espacio creado por la Internet no solo propició una comercialización masiva, sino que también permitió innovar en las relaciones interpersonales, diseños web personalizados, nuevos modelos de negocio, nuevas formas de publicidad y nuevas formas de comunicación a través de redes sociales. En la actualidad los usuarios conocen gente, intercambian opiniones, comparten experiencias, compara precios, productos y calidad, se compra y se vende, y la gente se siente como en su casa, por lo cual no desea ser molestada (Ordozgoiti, 2010, pp. 17-18).
De esta forma, se puede ver cómo el desarrollo de Internet y la evolución sostenida de las TIC impusieron una modificación ineludible de los procesos de comunicación entre los hombres, mujeres y niños de cada país de Latinoamérica. Son cada vez más las personas que utilizan la web como plataforma para la búsqueda de información, el entretenimiento y la interacción con otros individuos. En Argentina según el diario La Nación (Julio, 2013), el crecimiento de la publicidad –online– es importante, puesto que ha superado considerablemente a la publicidad en medios tradicionales. En el año 2010, la web se consolida como medio publicitario de amplia relevancia en Argentina, creciendo un 49.5% respecto de 2009 y superando en 528 millones de pesos la inversión efectuada en los diarios y la televisión.
En 2011, los pronósticos que estimaban un crecimiento del 40%, la publicidad –online– creció un 117%, facturando 1147 millones de pesos, pasando al 3º puesto entre los medios más demandados (Crettaz, 2012). Se atribuye este crecimiento principalmente al cambio de hábito en el consumo de medios por parte del público argentino.
Los cambios generados por Internet y su vertiginoso crecimiento, han llevado a las empresas a replantear sus modelos de negocios e incorporar estrategias basadas en los medios –online–, lo que se ha visto apoyado por el cambio de costumbres, hábitos de información, comunicación y consumo de los usuarios. El novedoso fenómeno comunicacional que es Internet, también ha tenido etapas de grandes cambios que se trasladaron inmediatamente a empresas y usuarios. La banda ancha y la web 2.0 y el surgimiento y ascenso de Google, simplificaron el acceso y la navegación, así como los niveles de creación y participación de los usuarios. Por su parte, la banda ancha permitió que los usuarios pasaran más tiempo navegando y la web 2.0 dio acceso a los usuarios a herramientas de uso relativamente sencillo, debido a su diseño focalizado en el usuario. Con estas herramientas, el usuario puede crear y compartir contenidos que se suban a la red, gestionando sus propias redes sociales o utilizando plataformas como Facebook o Twitter para compartir opiniones, conocimiento, contenidos e información. Desde esta perspectiva, los nuevos modelos de publicidad, dilucidaron nuevas oportunidades de negocios dentro de esta participación activa del usuario en el Internet, debido a que eran los mismos usuarios quienes daban cuenta de sus gustos e intereses, información sumamente valiosa para las empresas.
La nueva facilidad en la información creó un mercado o ventana de visualización para las empresas ofertantes, beneficiándose de aquella información obtenida de los propios usuarios denominados nuevos modelos de investigación de mercados y de consumo del usuario. Algunas de empresas han hecho grandes esfuerzos para posicionar la promoción de sus servicios y productos en miles de páginas web y blogs a través de publicidades en Google, Facebook, YouTube, MercadoLibre, Taringa y otros, para que dichos usuarios puedan satisfacer sus necesidades de manera rápida desde cualquier lugar. Estas tendencias hacen a la publicidad online cada vez más accesible y rentable.
Desde este contexto mencionado, ha llevado al ámbito empresarial argentino y latinoamericano de pequeñas y medianas empresas –PYMES– a replantearse sus estrategias de marketing y comunicación, debido al gran potencial que propicia hoy en día el Internet para poder tener un acceso mucho más fluido a las nuevas tendencias, permitiendo delimitar las nuevas posibilidades que tiene la empresa dentro del mercado. Así, se demuestra cómo Internet tiene que ser estudiado de manera consciente, puesto que se constituye en una fuente creciente de difusión de bienes y servicios. En este sentido, la posibilidad de las empresas no solo tienen ser considerada por las grandes corporaciones, sino que, sobre todo, por aquellas PYMES y comerciantes que están comenzando sus emprendimientos, puesto que Internet les ofrece la posibilidad de visualizarse de manera fácil y económica. Lo importante, es tener una planificación estratégica que permita reconocer cada una de las fortalezas del producto o bien a ofrecer.
En las etapas iniciales de Internet en las década de los ochenta, los modelos de negocio online requerían de una importante inversión inicial, pero el escenario se vio profundamente modificado por las interacciones de Google, la banda ancha y la intervención de la web 2.0. Según (Zanoni, 2008) "Google cambió todo, en 1999 Google era irrelevante y hoy domina Internet. Este hecho tiene efectos fenomenalmente relevantes. En 1999, para lograr tráfico masivo hacia un sitio era necesario hacer publicidad masiva y para eso era necesario mucho capital, millones de dólares". Por esta razón, Google en parte fue el gran responsable de la dinamización y circulación de las ofertas dentro de la red. Es tan potente que puede ayudar a una empresa a que se posicione rápidamente. Lo importante es que ésta tenga una página web bien construida para que la empresa logre indexar el contenido (lo cual se realiza por medio de la herramienta Webmaster tools y Adsense, de esta manera comienza a generar divisas o clientes en la red).
El éxito obtenido a través de la popularidad del buscador de Google desde su lanzamiento en septiembre de 1998 llevó a la empresa a replicar su eficiente modelo de indexación (o formato de ordenación de información para elaborar posteriormente su índice) como medio de publicidad para cualquier anunciante. Bajo esta premisa nace Google AdWords una interfaz que permite a sus usuarios crear sus propias campañas de comunicación en el año 2000 como su sistema de publicidad online auto gestionado, que relaciona las palabras clave usadas por los internautas con anuncios patrocinados relacionados a la búsqueda. Este modelo es desarrollado a partir de las ciencias de la información, área del conocimiento encargada de la gestión y organización del conocimiento, así como la indexación de la información en los sistemas de bases de datos que usando los análisis de los buscadores o querys, usan los tesauros o palabras claves para identificar y organizar la información dentro del sistema de buscador de Google, la base del sistema es conocido como page rank. Las herramientas y facilidades que brinda Internet han sido rápidamente captadas por los usuarios, quienes las han adoptado para sus actividades de consumo. Este fenómeno se ha visto profundizado por las sucesivas crisis y distintas recesiones que muchas economías del mundo han sufrido estos últimos años, lo que ha permitido sacar provecho la a información directa sobre proveedores, marcas, precios, productos y servicios, establecer comparaciones y aún efectuar la compra desde la comodidad de su hogar, o desde su teléfono inteligente, sin necesidad de un intermediario. Esto ha llevado a afirmaciones como la realizada por la comunidad de emprendedores Red innova "Salir de la crisis económica pasa por emprender y más concretamente, por emprender en el entorno digital" (Diario informático, 2012). Se puede afirmar así, que los medios elegidos tradicionalmente para publicitar como la televisión, la radio o la gráfica han perdido la hegemonía que poseían entre las preferencias de los potenciales consumidores. Esta situación obligó a las empresas a gestionar nuevas estrategias para captar y retener sus clientes.
Fue así como apareció el concepto de Marketing online. Este fenómeno comunicacional ha cambiado el modo en que se consume, puesto que permite resolver con mayor velocidad las necesidades, además de contar con información cada vez más precisa y detallada sobre los servicios y productos disponibles para los consumidores, también permite combinar la información online, con actividades offline, como acercarse a la tienda más cercana al lugar en el que el usuario realiza la búsqueda y que provea el servicio o producto que éste está dispuesto a comprar. Así, el Internet se convierte en una herramienta de venta fundamental para el éxito de las empresas y marcas, y la publicidad juega en ello un rol indispensable: ser visible en Internet es un factor clave de éxito. Así mismo las nuevas formas del diseño en la publicidad, pues adquieren nuevos parámetros, estilos, estructuras.
La evolución tecnológica no solo genera cambios en los usuarios sino que también en la forma en que se realiza publicidad y es por causa de este dinamismo incesante que la información resulta indispensable para elaborar estrategias comunicacionales acertadas que permitan conocer profundamente al público objetivo, por lo que conocer sus conductas online, sus necesidades, expectativas y preferencias en materia publicitaria, resulta cada vez más necesario, en un contexto de rápidos cambios, alta competencia y de nuevas oportunidades, tanto para las grandes corporaciones, como para las pequeñas empresas. Cabe detenerse en la nueva posición en la que se encuentran las empresas al momento de vender sus productos. Los usuarios de Internet cuentan con una herramienta que les permite obtener con facilidad información sobre un determinado producto o servicio, comparando las ventajas que les ofrecen las diversas marcas. De esta manera, la competencia entre las empresas se intensifica, induciéndolas a presentar sus productos con creatividad e inteligencia a los diversos públicos objetivos.
Ante tal situación, se percibe que las condiciones de éxito empresarial están condicionadas por la manera en que se capitalizan las herramientas que provee Internet. Las reglas del juego para competir en el mercado se han modificado, y todo parece indicar que quien no se adapte a ellas terminará perdiendo en rentabilidad y crecimiento económico.
Como se dijo anteriormente, esta realidad no solo tiene que ser consideradas por las grandes empresas, dispersas por el mundo entero, sino que también por las pequeñas y medianas (PYMES). Es importante enfatizar que el uso adecuado de la web exige a las empresas contar con un equipo dedicado exclusivamente a esta tarea. De aquí la importancia de un departamento de marketing digital. Sin embargo, el presupuesto y estructura de las PYMES no se ajusta a tal requerimiento, no cuentan con el personal suficiente para distribuir las tareas tal como se desearía, haciendo muchas veces que una misma persona ejecute diversas funciones. En estas condiciones, se hace más difícil estar atentos a las condiciones cambiantes del mercado y capacitarse para responder a dichas exigencias.
Si es previsión constitucional la garantía de la responsabilidad y la interdicción de la arbitrariedad de los poderes públicos, como veremos, la ciudadanía está en la obligación y derecho de exigir la eliminación de cualquier forma de manipulación y corrupción que se hace realidad al existir mecanismos de control en la actuación contractual, que van más allá del recurso contencioso-administrativo, y que adopta hoy forma de recurso especial en materia de contratación con el que lograr la legalidad en la decisiones precontractuales, y en última instancia el principio de buen gobierno en sede de contratos, como realidad y no como mero objetivo así como la ejemplaridad en toda función pública, descartando mecanismos de corrupción en nuestro sector de los contratos, pues sin ética del gobierno no habrá posibilidad de lograr una eficaz y eficiente Administración. Así la satisfacción de los intereses generales que guían el actuar de la Administración, provoca que cuando la prestación de consentimiento contractual se realiza por una Administración o ente público, dada la finalidad a que debe tender toda acción administrativa de satisfacción con objetividad de los intereses generales, la inicial libertad contractual se encuentra singularmente matizada, a causa de que la Administración no puede contratar con quién quiere, sino con quién debe, es decir con el mejor interesado a establecer vínculos contractuales con ella (STS de 20 de Diciembre de 2007). En definitiva si la contratación pública está presidida por el principio de inalterabilidad del fin de interés público, esto obliga a que la Administración disponga de una serie de prerrogativas delimitadas por el juego de los principios esenciales de la contratación administrativa, la preponderancia del fin de interés público y respeto al equilibrio contractual (Consejo Consultivo de Castilla La Mancha, Dictamen nº 86/2005, de 15 de junio) asegurándose así el mejor cumplimiento de interés público, la eficacia y eficacia en la gestión contractual y evitando posibles corrupciones, para cuya erradicación existen mecanismos legales suficientes. De manera que el recurso especial en materia de contratación y su regulación para la eficiencia en su utilización nos induce a la consecución efectiva y eficiente de la prestación demandada. En el presente trabajo se presenta y explica la importancia de la figura del recurso especial en materia de contratación pública como mecanismo de control. Para ello se aborda inicialmente su regulación, resultando ser un medio de origen comunitario, lo que nos obliga a analizar tanto las Directivas comunitarias principalmente la Directiva 89/665 como la jurisprudencia comunitaria, por cuanto la base y respaldo de la regulación la ofrece la interpretación de esto Tribunal básicamente de los principios generales de la contratación a aplicar en cada Estado miembro. Razón que nos obliga a estudiar en apartado específica cada uno de estos principios aplicados a la contratación pública en general y al recurso especial en particular. Son principios siempre presentes la transparencia, objetividad y eficacia en la actuación pública, de mear que así comprendamos la rapidez y eficacia que se delimitan como notas del recurso especial desde el prisma comunitario. Ante esta realidad la regulación española para hacer realidad aquellos principios general de la contratación y obligado el Derecho de la Unión Europea regula este medio de control efectivo de la actividad contractual de la Administración y el instrumento para hacer lo efectivo como son los tribunales administrativos de recursos contractuales. El mecanismo del recurso especial que sin embargo en España ha encontrado dificultades por parte de las autoridades para incorporarse a nuestro ordenamiento. Dificultades que tras encontrar respuesta de la jurisprudencia comunitaria , obligó al legislador español a su reconocimiento y regulación. El impulso comunitario hacia la creación en los Estado Miembros del recurso especial, fue motivado al apreciarse el lento y subjetivo mecanismo del sistema de recursos de cada Estado , por lo que se acordó la aprobación de la Directiva 89/665/CEE del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas, de 21 de diciembre de 1989, relativa a la coordinación de las disposiciones legales, reglamentarias y administrativas referentes a la aplicación de los procedimientos de recurso en materia de adjudicación de los contratos públicos de suministros y de obras, (Directiva de recursos) que obligaba a regular y aprobar un régimen de recursos en materia contractual, con dos notas, rápido y eficaz. Se analiza esta Directiva de recursos en la exposición así como todas las que han continuada su estela, modificándola en búsqueda permanente de la mayor seguridad jurídica y no discriminación. Así se analizarán las Directivas 92/13/CEE, la Directiva 2007/66/CE, Directiva 93/36/CEE del Consejo, de 14 de junio de 1993, Directiva 93/37/CEE del Consejo, de 14 de junio de 1993, Directiva 2004/17/CE y Directiva 2004/18/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 31 de marzo de 2004, Directivas 2014/23, 24 y 25/UE, del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 26 de febrero de 2014. El camino jurídico seguido por este instrumento de control, tras las dificultades internas tomaron cuerpo en la presión de las autoridades comunitarias que desembocaron en una carga imperativa de condena materializada en las SSTJUE de 15 de mayo de 2003 Comisión contra Reino de España (Asunto C-214/00) y de 3 de abril de 2008 Comisión contra Reino de España (Asunto C-444/06). Para entender esta obligación, se analizará igualmente la evolución normativa en la materia del recurso especial que ha dispuesto en España. Una regulación que comenzará en la Ley 13/1995, de 18 de mayo, de Contratos de las Administraciones Públicas, pasando por la Ley 30/2007, de 30 de octubre, de Contratos del sector Público ,Ley 34/2010, de 5 de agosto, de modificación de la Ley 30/2007, el Real Decreto Legislativo 3/2011, de 14 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Contratos del Sector Público y terminará en la nueva Ley de Contratos del Sector Público, Ley 9/2017, de 8 de noviembre, de Contratos del Sector Público, por la que se transponen al ordenamiento jurídico español las Directivas del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo 2014/23/UE y 2014/24/UE, de 26 de febrero de 2014. Si bien esta nueva regulación vigente a pesar de derogar la normativa precedente, por su escaso desarrollo jurídico desde la perspectiva de la jurisprudencia, de los tribunales de contratos y de la doctrina, obliga en este trabajo, a un estudio comparativo con la regulación precedente de 2011 que nos servirá para su mejor comprensión. Así si antes de la Directiva 89/665/CEE, no existiendo recurso especial se disponía de los recursos administrativos ordinarios, con la Ley 13/1995,de 18 de mayo, de Contratos de las Administraciones Públicas, con la que se transponían las Directivas de recursos de los años 1989 y 1992, no cambio el panorama, sino una vez se condena a España por el incumplimiento de estas Directivas en la STJUE de 15 de mayo de 2003, pues según la sentencia: "no haber extendido el sistema de recursos garantizados por la citada Directiva a las decisiones adoptadas por todas las entidades adjudicadoras (…)" y "no haber previsto la posibilidad de que se tomen todo tipo de medidas cautelares procedentes en relación con las decisiones adoptadas por las entidades adjudicadoras". Tras esta condena y tras la aprobación de la Ley 30/2007, de 30 octubre, de Contratos del Sector Público, se regulaba un mecanismo de recursos en materia de contratación pública. Recurso que era preceptivo. No obstante al ser una incorporación de las Directiva de Recursos de mínimos, se volvió a condenar de nuevo a España en la STJUE de 3 de abril de 2008, por ser un régimen de recursos insuficientes: no se prevé plazo obligatorio para que la entidad adjudicadora notificara su resolución sobre la adjudicación a todos los licitadores; no había plazo de espera obligatorio entre la adjudicación y celebración del contrato y deficiencias de las medidas provisionales. Así tras esta nuevo sentencia condenatoria se aprobó la Ley 34/2010, de 5 de agosto, luego refundida con otras leyes para alumbrar el Real Decreto Legislativo 3/2011, de 14 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Contratos del Sector Público (TRLCSP) llegando al día de hoy en que se dispone de la Ley de Contratos del Sector Público (LCSP2017) y que transpone a nuestro ordenamiento jurídico las Directivas del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 26 de febrero de 2014, 2014/24/UE, sobre contratación pública y 2014/23/UE, relativa a la adjudicación de contratos de concesión. III. CARACTERISTICAS DEL RECURSO ESPECIAL. Se abordará de manera propia en su apartado correspondiente el estudio de la naturaleza jurídica del recurso especial, analizando cada una de sus notas: Potestativo, eficaz, rápido, especial, excluyente, paralizándote del procedimiento y revisor. Así como particular mención exigirá el régimen de la invalidez de los contratos y el recurso especial y su relación con el contrato menor desde el punto de visto del fraude por la división del objeto del contrato y el nuevo criterio general marcado por la Ley de 2017 hacia la división en lotes. El recurso especial en materia de contratación pública, es un medio para luchar y solventar las infracciones del Derecho europeo de contratos públicos habiendo sido delimitado hasta la nueva Ley como recurso precontractual, por ser su objeto los actos anteriores a la formalización del contrato. IV.AMBITOS: OBJETIVO/SUBJETIVO. Ser analizará por un aparte su dimensión objetiva y por otra la dimensión subjetiva. Para la objetiva, estudiando los contratos objeto del recurso especial por una parte y por otra los actos controlados por el recurso especial y sus excepciones. Dedicando parte del estudio de la dimensión objetiva a los actos de trámite cualificado, al trámite de emergencia y a la potestad de modificación contractual. La regulación del TRLCSP limitaba el uso del recurso especial a contratos sujetos a regulación armonizada. Realidad criticada por la doctrina en aras al principio de igualdad, la seguridad jurídica y el real y efectivo control a toda actuación contractual de la Administración. Caso contrario muchos serán los contratos que quedaban fuera del necesario control y con ello dando facilidades de prácticas corruptas. Razones que impulsaron al Consejo de Estado (Dictamen nº 514/2006, de 25 de mayo y Dictamen nº 499/2010, de 29 de abril) y a la doctrina se manifestaran por una ampliación y extensión del régimen de recursos a todos los contratos, con independencia de su importe, o, al menor a rebajar estos umbrales. De hecho en España tenemos CCAA que así lo contemplan: Aragón (artículo 17.2.a) de la Ley 3/2011, de 24 de febrero, de medidas en materia de Contratos del Sector Público de Aragón, Islas Baleares (artículo 66 Ley 3/2003, de 26 de marzo) y en Navarra (artículo 210.1 Ley Foral 6/2006, de 9 de junio, de Contratos Públicos). La nueva LCSP2017 presenta novedades respecto al objeto del recurso especial como que se puede interponerse sobre actos y decisiones cuando se refieran a los contratos de obra y concesiones de obra o de servicios con un valor superior a los 3.000.000€ y de 100.000€ para los contratos de servicios y suministros; y siendo también objeto de recurso los contratos administrativos especiales, "cuando, por sus características no sea posible fijar su precio de licitación o, en otro caso, cuando su valor estimado sea superior a lo establecido para los contratos de servicios" y asimismo serán susceptibles de recurso especial en materia de contratación los contratos subvencionados a que se refiere el artículo 23, y los encargos cuando, por sus características no sea posible fijar su importe o, en otro caso, cuando este, atendida su duración total más las prórrogas, sea igual o superior a lo establecido para los contratos de servicios". Sobre su objeto ahora se añaden situaciones que pueden ser causas de nulidad (que se eliminan del texto) y modificaciones no previstas en los pliegos; y sobre la suspensión automática se reconoce la suspensión de la tramitación del procedimiento cuando el acto recurrido sea el de adjudicación, salvo en el supuesto de contratos basados en un acuerdo marco o de contratos específicos en el marco de un sistema dinámico de adquisición". Añadiendo estos actos susceptibles de recurso especial: acuerdos de adjudicación, las modificaciones basadas determinado incumplimiento por entender que la modificación debió ser objeto de una nueva adjudicación, la formalización de encargos a medios propios cuando éstos no cumplan los requisitos legales y el acuerdo de rescate de concesiones. En la dimensión subjetiva, será pieza clave la legitimación para interponer el recurso especial en materia de contratación, dedicando atención al juego diario de la interpretación jurisprudencial y de los Tribunales de contratos a la idea del interés legítimo, y a la legitimación de entidades como: el concejal, las Uniones Temporales de Empresas y las organizaciones sindicales. Se desprende del artículo 1.3 de la Directiva 89/665/CEE que el recurso "sea accesibles, como mínimo, a cualquier persona que tenga o haya tenido interés en obtener un determinado contrato y que se haya visto o pueda verse perjudicada por una presunta infracción ", la legitimación para poder acudir al recurso especial goza de una interpretación amplia para su empleo por los que han sido partícipes en el procedimiento de adjudicación, y también para quienes sin haber participado , acrediten interés legítimo para obtener el contrato (STJCE de 28 de octubre de 1999, Alcatel Austria AG (Asunto C-81/98). Interpretación amplia que también siguen el Tribunal Constitucional (SSTC nº 123/1996, de 8 de julio; nº1/2000, de 17 de enero y nº129/2001, de 4 de junio) el Tribunal Supremo (SSTS de 7 de mayo de 2010 y de 19 de enero de 2015) y el TACRC (Resolución nº 78/2015, de 23 de enero) precisando exista la posibilidad de obtener alguna posición ventajosa o eliminar alguna situación desfavorable. Problemática a analizar es la legitimación de quien no participara en el procedimiento, no recurrió los pliegos antes de la adjudicación, que creía discriminatorios, y que no participó porque no tenía las condiciones de prestar el objeto del contrato por esos criterios discriminatorios del pliegos. Situación que obtuvo la respuesta de la STJCE de 12 de febrero de 2004, Caso Grossmann Air Service (Asunto C-230/02), que consideró conforme a Derecho no reconocer legitimación a quien no participó sino que solo tuvo una posición pasiva. Por su parte el licitador que sí participa y que presenta su oferta, acepta tácitamente con este hecho el contenido del pliego. Por esta razón tampoco dispone de legitimación si pretende impugna la adjudicación por considerar existen vicios en el pliego, pero sin impugnarlos inicialmente y salvo que estemos ante casos de nulidad, en el que sí tendría legitimación (Resoluciones nº 255/2015, de 23 de marzo, nº 195/2015, de 27 de febrero y nº 554/2017 de 23 de junio TACRC). Criterio matizado por la STJUE 12 de marzo de 2015, Caso eVigilo (asunto C-538/13), al admitir la impugnación del pliego, pasado el plazo, si el licitador sólo pudo conocer la naturaleza discriminatoria de los pliegos cuando supo la resolución, notificada por el poder adjudicador. Saber que la doctrina es consolidad respecto al carácter preclusivo de los plazos para recurrir (SSTS 2307/2007, de 21 de marzo y STJUE de 12 de diciembre de 2002, Caso Universale-Bau AG (Asunto C- 470/99) y de 28 de enero de 2010, Caso Comisión contra Irlanda (Asunto C-456/08). Particular estudio se hace de la legitimación del concejal, de las Uniones Temporales de Empresas (UTE) ,de las Asociaciones profesionales y de los Sindicatos por los intereses colectivos que representan: Concejal: Sí disponen de legitimación el concejal a título individual, pero no los grupos políticos en aplicación del artículo 63.1.b/ Ley 7/1985, de 2 de abril, Reguladora de las Bases del Régimen Local (Resoluciones nº 112/2015, de 6 de febrero y nº145/2016, de 9 de febrero, TACRC) UTE: El debate por si pudiera recurrir uno de sus miembros de manera separada de los demás, paso de su negativa reflejada en la STJUE de 8 de septiembre de 2005, Caso Espace Trianon, S.A. - Asunto C-129/04) a su admisibilidad, por respeto a la tutela judicial en la STJUE de 6 de mayo de 2010, Caso Club Hotel Loutraki AE (Asuntos acumulados C-145/08 y C-149/08) y por las SSTS 11 de julio 2006 y 23 de julio de 2008 y salvo el supuesto previsto en la STS de 22 junio de 2009 y Resolución nº 479/2014, de 18 de junio TACRC, en que una de las empresas acepta la adjudicación y no la recurre, pues en este caso las demás no disponen de legitimación para interponer recurso contra esta adjudicación. No participando en la licitación, hay que analizar la legitimación de asociaciones que tiene por objeto defender intereses colectivos, por ello que solo tendrán legitimación, si interés que dicen defender al recurrir está conectado con el objeto del contrato (Resoluciones nº 24/2011, de 22 de junio, nº 294/2011, de 7 de diciembre, nº 20/2015, de 9 de enero y nº 4/2016, de 12 de enero, TACRC). Así Asociaciones profesionales, como un Colegio de Arquitectos dispone de legitimación sobre contratos cuyo objeto es la redacción de determinados proyectos de construcción; la Asociación Española de Empresas de Parques y Jardines sobre aquel contrato de servicios relacionado con jardinería o la Asociación profesional de Ingenierías de Seguridad y Salud en las Obras de Construcción impugnando el pliego que rige el contrato para prestar servicio para el desarrollo de las actividades preventivas y acciones de coordinación en los proyectos y obras. Los Sindicatos: Disponen de legitimación si acreditan un vínculo especial y concreto entre el ellos y el objeto de debate, con lo que obtener un beneficio o eliminar un perjuicio de estimarse su recurso (STC nº 159/2006, de 22 de mayo). Ejemplos de adjudicarse un contrato para la gestión privada de un hospital público o la concesión de obra pública de conservación y explotación que dañe derechos colectivos de los trabajadores. Visto que la Directiva 2007/66/CE, (art. 9.2) no cierra el modelo a adoptar sino que concede libertad a cada Estado Miembro, para que se prevé a si la resolución del recurso se atribuye a un órgano jurisdiccional o no jurisdiccional. Realidad que ha provocado un debate doctrinal sobre la naturaleza jurídica, jurisdiccional o administrativo de estos órganos. Debate para el que se acudirá a la STJCE de 4 de febrero de 1999, Josef Köllensperger (Asunto C-103/97). En España el sistema adoptado es el de un órgano cuasi-jurisdiccional, y aunque desde nuestro régimen jurídico sea un órgano administrativo, en Europa se le atribuye naturaleza de órgano jurisdiccional (STJUE Sentencia del TJUE de 6 de octubre de 2015, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme contra Corporació de Salut del Maresme i la Selva(Asunto C-203/14). Tan solo llamar la atención de la función revisora de los actos recurridos en orden a determinar si se ha producido un vicio de nulidad o anulabilidad de este tribunal, por cuanto es de control de la legalidad del acto impugnado, confirmándolo o anulándolo, pero no pudiendo cambiarlo. Así de encontrase con vicios del acto lo anulará, "ordenando que se repongan las actuaciones al momento anterior a aquel en el que el vicio se produjo, pero sin que el Tribunal pueda sustituir la competencia de los órganos intervinientes en el proceso de contratación, en este caso del órgano de contratación único al que corresponde dictar el acto de adjudicación, so pena de incurrir en incompetencia material sancionada con nulidad radical" (Resoluciones nº 99/2015, de 30 de enero, nº48/2016, de 22 de enero y nº 62/2012, de 29 de febrero TACRC). V. PROCEDIMIENTO. El procedimiento de recurso especial pretende ser rápido, mostrado en la reducción de plazos, así como pretender aplicar la administración electrónica al mismo. Se diferencia parte como: 1.ANUNCIO. Antes de la interposición del recurso en la regulación del TRLCSP se anunciaba por escrito al órgano de contratación la intención de recurrir, señalando el acto a impugnar. Su fin era que el órgano de contratación supiera de la interposición del recurso. No obstante muchos son quienes lo consideran superfluo pues el órgano de contratación sabrá del recurso cuando el tribunal administrativo se lo notifique el día de su interposición. Por ello que su función es cumplida con la presentación del recurso en el registro del órgano de contratación ( Resolución nº 1046/2015, de 13 de noviembre TACRC), así que con la nueva LCSP2017 es novedoso que el procedimiento del recurso especial se interpone sin necesidad de anuncio previo. 2.INTERPOSICIÓN. La interposición da comienzo al procedimiento de recurso. Con un plazo de caducidad de interposición de quince días hábiles, y con diferencia de cómputo en un criterio general y tres específicas según el acto recurrido. El general que se computa desde el día siguiente a aquél en que se remita la notificación del acto impugnado y específicas, según el objeto del recurso: el anuncio de licitación, los pliegos y demás documentos contractuales o los actos de trámite. 3. LAS MEDIDAS PROVISIONALES. Se analizan las medidas provisionales como medios para corregir las posibles infracciones del procedimiento o impedir que se causen otros perjuicios a los interesados afectados, cuya petición podrá ser previa a la interposición del recurso o junto al escrito de recurso. 4. LOS TRÁMITES BASICOS son: la comunicación al órgano de contratación y remisión del expediente; la audiencia a los interesados; la prueba. 5.RESOLUCIÓN. Termina el procedimiento con una resolución del tribunal a adoptar resolver el recurso en el plazo de cinco días hábiles. Todo el procedimiento cumplirá un plazo máximo de resolución de dos meses desde el día siguiente a su interposición. Transcurrido se entiende desestimado a efectos de interponer recurso contencioso-administrativo. Como contenido de la resolución, que deberá ser motivada , podrá ser acordar sobre la Administración indemnizar al interesado por los daños y perjuicios provocados por la infracción legal que provocó el recurso. También se acordará, si procediese, levantarla suspensión automática del acto de adjudicación y de las restantes medidas cautelares que se hubieran acordado, y devolverse la garantía exigidas. Y multas en caso de apreciarse temeridad o mala fe. Los tribunales administrativos han intentado precisar qué se entiende por temeridad o mala fe por el licitador en casos cuando se prueba ha realizado manifestaciones falsas según la documentación del expediente o cuando no adjudicándole el contrato, solo busca frenar la ejecución del contrato (Resolución nº 240/2014, de 21 de marzo, TACRC) Efectos de la resolución del recurso: recurribilidad de la misma y, por otro, a su ejecutabilidad. Con la nueva Ley de 2017, la resolución se residencia en el Tribunal Central de Recursos Contractuales, en Tribunales contractuales de las CCAAs y admitiéndose la creación de Tribunales Locales de Contratación por las Diputaciones Provinciales y los Ayuntamientos de los municipios de gran población. Si los tribunales son independientes , la resolución del recurso no es susceptible de recurso extraordinario de revisión. No es posible la revisión de oficio contra la resolución sino que solo cabe impugnarla en la vía contencioso-administrativa (Resoluciones nº 1177/2015, de 22 de diciembre y nº 47/2016, de 22 de enero, TACRC). En cuanto a su ejecutabilidad, la resolución será directamente ejecutiva resultando de aplicación, en su caso, el artículo 101 Ley 39/2015. Ejecución que llevará a término el órgano de contratación autor del acto. Y cuyos incidentes de ejecución se plantearán ante el tribunal que dictó la resolución, por lo que asume también funciones de control de la ejecución de la resolución por el órgano de contratación, que no atendida daría lugar a un caso de inactividad material prevista en el artículo 29.1 LJCA. VI. VALORACIÓN. El recurso especial en materia de contratación pública es hoy un mecanismo administrativo clave de control en materia de contratación. Analizadas la tarea desempeñada por los distintos tribunales se observa un porcentaje de resoluciones dictadas con rapidez, por órgano cualificados e independientes, haciendo efectivo la seguridad jurídica y la confianza de los licitadores y de manera directa a este efecto, la reducción de la litigiosidad en sede de la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativo sobre este sector contractual, como se desprende de las Memorias tanto del TACRC como de los Tribunales autonómicos.
Not Available ; The land resource inventory of Belur-1 microwatershed was conducted using village cadastral maps and IRS satellite imagery on 1:7920 scale. The false colour composites of IRS imagery were interpreted for physiography and these physiographic delineations were used as base for mapping soils. The soils were studied in several transects and a soil map was prepared with phases of soil series as mapping units. Random checks were made all over the area outside the transects to confirm and validate the soil map unit boundaries. The soil map shows the geographic distribution and extent, characteristics, classification, behavior and use potentials of the soils in the Microwatershed. The present study covers an area of 514 ha in Koppal taluk and district, Karnataka. The climate is semiarid and categorized as drought - prone with an average annual rainfall of 662 mm, of which about 424 mm is received during south –west monsoon, 161 mm during north-east and the remaining 77 mm during the rest of the year. An area of about 86 per cent is covered by soil and 14 per cent by habitation and water body. The salient findings from the land resource inventory are summarized briefly below The soils belong to 11 soil series and 18 soil phases (management units) and 7 land management units. The length of crop growing period is 200 mm/m) in available water capacity. Entire area in the microwatershed is very gently sloping (1-3%) lands. An area of about 11 per cent is slightly eroded (e1) and 75 per cent is moderately eroded (e2) lands. An area of about 6% is moderately alkaline (pH 7.8-8.4), 76 per cent is strongly alkaline (pH 8.4-9.0) and 4% is very strongly alkaline (pH >9.0) in reaction. The Electrical Conductivity (EC) of the soils are dominantly 57 kg/ha) in 7 per cent area of the microwatershed. Available potassium is medium (145-337 kg/ha) in 68 per cent and high (>337 kg/ha) in 18 per cent area of the soils. Available sulphur is low (4.5 ppm) in 21 per cent area of the microwatershed. Available zinc is deficient (0.6 ppm) in 11 per cent area of the microwatershed. Available manganese and copper is sufficient in the entire area of the microwatershed. The land suitability for 31 major agricultural and horticultural crops grown in the microwatershed was assessed and the areas that are highly suitable (class S1) and moderately suitable (class S2) are given below. It is however to be noted that a given soil may be suitable for various crops but what specific crop to be grown may be decided by the farmer looking to his capacity to invest on various inputs, marketing infrastructure, market price, and finally the demand and supply position. Land suitability for various crops in the microwatershed Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Sorghum 96(19) 165(32) Sapota 15(3) 143(28) Maize 15(3) 246(48) Pomegranate 47(9) 251(49) Bajra 125(24) 247(48) Musambi 96(19) 202(39) Groundnut - 237(46) Lime 96(19) 202(39) Sunflower 96(19) 91(17) Amla 47(9) 371(72) Redgram 15(3) 170(33) Cashew 47(9) 111(22) Bengal gram 81(16) 180(34) Jackfruit 15(3) 143(28) Cotton 81(16) 180(34) Jamun - 218(43) Chilli 15(3) 143(27) Custard apple 128(25) 290(56) Tomato 15(3) 65(12) Tamarind - 208(41) Brinjal 47(9) 227(44) Mulberry 47(9) 174(34) Onion 47(9) 46(9) Marigold 15(3) 246(47) Bhendi 47(9) 227(44) Chrysanthemum 15(3) 246(47) Drumstick 47(9) 186(36) Jasmine 15(3) 106(20) Mango - 59(11) Crossandra 15(3) 67(12) Guava 15(3) 143(28) Apart from the individual crop suitability, a proposed crop plan has been prepared for the 7 identified LMUs by considering only the highly and moderately suitable lands for different crops and cropping systems with food, fodder, fibre and other horticulture crops. Maintaining soil-health is vital for crop production and conserve soil and land resource base for maintaining ecological balance and to mitigate climate change. For this, several ameliorative measures have been suggested to these problematic soils like saline/alkali, highly eroded, sandy soils etc., Soil and water conservation and drainage line treatment plan has been prepared that would help in identifying the sites to be treated and also the type of structures required. As part of the greening programme, several tree species have been suggested to be planted in marginal and submarginal lands, field bunds and also in the hillocks, mounds and ridges. That would help in supplementing the farm income, provide fodder and fuel, and generate lot of biomass which in turn would help in maintaining the ecological balance and contribute to mitigating the climate change. SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY Results indicated that, 35 farmers were sampled in Belur-1 micro watershed among them 8 (22.86%) were marginal farmers, 6 (17.14 %) were small farmers, 7 (20 %) were semi medium farmers, 8 (22.86%) were medium farmers, large farmers 1(2.86%) and 5 (10.20 %) landless farmers were also interviewed for the survey. The data indicated that there were 194 population households were there in the studied micro watershed. Among them 100 (51.55%) men and 94 (48.45%) were women. The average family size of landless farmers was 4, marginal and medium farmers were 5, small and semi medium farmer was 6 and large farmer was 11. On an average the family size was 5. The data indicated that 49 (25.26%) people were in 0-15 years of age, 76 (39.18 %) were in 16-35 years of age, 54 (27.84 %) were in 36-60 years of age and 15 (7.73%) were above 61 years of age. The results indicated that the Belur-1 had 28.35 per cent illiterates, 30.41 per cent of them had primary school education, 14.43 per cent of them had middle school, 11.86 per cent them had high school education, 5.15 per cent of them had PUC education, 1.03 per cent them had Diploma education, 0.52 had ITI education, 3.61 per cent of them had degree education, 1.03 per cent of them had masters education and 3.61 per cent them had others. The results indicated that, 85.71 per cent of households practicing agriculture, 11.43 per cent of the household heads were agricultural labour and 2.86 per cent of the household heads were general labour. The results indicated that agriculture was the major occupation for 59.79 per cent of the household members, 6.70 per cent were agricultural labourers, 0.52 per cent were general labours, 1.03 percent were in private sector, 24.74 per cent of them were students, 3.61 per cent of them were children and 3.09 per cent were housewives. In case of landless households 5 per cent were agriculture, 50 per cent were agriculture labour, 5 per cent were general labour and 15 per cent were students. In case of marginal farmers 76.74 per cent were agriculturist, 2.33 percent were in private service and 16.28 per cent were students. In case of small farmers 57.14 per cent of them were agriculturist and 40 per cent of them were students. In case of semi medium farmers 62.12 per cent of the family members were agriculturist, 2.33 per cent were in private service, 20.93 per cent of them were students, 4.65 per cent were housewives and 6.98 per cent were children. In case of medium farmers 59.52 per cent of the family members were agriculturist, 4.76 per cent were agriculture labour, 2.38 per cent were children and 33.33 per cent of them were students. In case of large farmers 81.82 per cent were doing agriculture, 9.09 per cent were both agriculture labour and students respectively. 2 The results showed that 0.52 per cent of them participated in cooperative bank and 99.48 per cent of them have not participated in any local institutions. Only small farmers were found to participate in one or the other local institutions. The results indicated that 57.14 per cent of the households possess thatched house and 45.71 per cent of the households possess Pucca house. 100 per cent of the land less farmers possess thatched house and 100 per cent of the large farmers possess Pucca house. The results showed that, 100 per cent of the households possess TV and Mixer grinder respectively. 8.57 per cent of the households possess bicycle, 34.29 per cent of the households possess motor cycle and 97.14 per cent of the households possess mobile phones. The results showed that the average value television was Rs. 6257, mixer grinder was Rs.1485, bicycle was Rs.3000, motor cycle was Rs.34583 and mobile phone was Rs.1376. The results indicated that about 20 per cent of the households possess both bullock cart and plough, 2.86 per cent of the households possess both power tiller and tractor respectively. 17.14 per cent of the households possess sprayer, 88.57 per cent of the households possess weeder and 2.86 per cent of the households possess thresher. The results showed that the average value of bullock cart was Rs.18000; the average value of plough was Rs. 1500, the average value of power tiller was Rs. 25000, the average value of tractor was Rs. 500000, the average value of sprayer was Rs. 5000, the average value of weeder was Rs. 26 and the average value of thresher was Rs. 20000. The results indicated that, 17.14 per cent of the households possess bullocks, 37.14 per cent of the households possess local cow, 8.57 per cent of the households possess buffalo and 5.71 per cent of the households possess. In case of marginal farmers, 12.50 per cent of the households possess bullock and 25 per cent of the household possess local cow, 12.50 per cent household possess buffalo and sheep respectively. In case of small farmers, 33.33 per cent of households possess bullock, 66.67 per cent possess local cow and 16.67 per cent of the households possess sheep. In case of semi medium farmers, 14.29 per cent of the households possess bullock, 28.57 per cent of the household possess local cow and 16.67 per cent of the households possess sheep. In case of medium farmers 12.50 per cent of the household possess bullock and 50 per cent of the household possess local cow. In large farmers 100 per cent of the household possess bullock, local cow and sheep respectively. The results indicated that, average own labour men available in the micro watershed was 2, average own labour (women) available was 1.84, average hired 3 labour (men) available was 7.30 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.20. In case of marginal farmers, average own labour men available was 1.88, average own labour (women) was also 2.13, average hired labour (men) was 7.38 and average hired labour (women) available was 7. In case of small farmers, average own labour men available was 1.67, average own labour (women) was 1.50, average hired labour (men) was 7 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.17. In case of semi medium farmers, average own labour men available was 2.43, average own labour (women) was 1.86, average hired labour (men) was 7.29 and average hired labour (women) available was 7. In medium farmers average own labour men available was 1.63, average own labour (women) was 1.63, average hired labour (men) was 7.50 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.50. In case of large farmers, average own labour men available was 5, average own labour (women) was 4, average hired labour (men) was 7 and average hired labour (women) available was 8. The results indicated that, 85.71 per cent of the household opined that hired labour was adequate. The results indicated that, households of the Belur-1 micro watershed possess 24.79 ha (42.06 %) of dry land and 34.15 ha (57.94 %) of irrigated land. Marginal farmers possess 2.74 ha (62.59 %) of dry land and 1.63ha (37.14%) of irrigated land. Small farmers possess 6.05 ha (78.65 %) of dry land and 1.64 ha (21.35 %) of irrigated land. Semi medium farmers possess 3.38 ha (26.89 %) of dry land and 9.17 ha (73.11%) of irrigated land. Medium farmers possess 12.63 ha (45.34%) of dry land and 15.22 ha (54.66%) of irrigated land. Large farmers possess 6.48 ha (100%) of irrigated land. The results indicated that, the average value of dry land was Rs. 318325.99 and average value of irrigated was Rs. 494643.91. In case of marginal famers, the average land value was Rs. 949999.98 for dry land and Rs. 2690098.94 for irrigated land. In case of small famers, the average land value was Rs. 396256.68 for dry land Rs. 1216748.79 for irrigated land. In case of semi medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 294682.25 for dry land and Rs. 610145.56 for irrigated land. In case of medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 150416.67 for dry land and Rs. 256060.61 for irrigated land. In case of large farmers the average land value was Rs.154375 for irrigated land. The results indicated that, there were 15 functioning and 3 de-functioning bore wells in the micro watershed. The results indicated that, bore well was the major irrigation source for 42.86 per cent of the farmers. The results indicated that on an average the depth of the bore well was 36.66 meters. 4 The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers there was 1.88 ha of irrigated land, in case of small farmers there was 1.62 ha of irrigated land, semi medium farmers were having 8.10 ha of irrigated land, medium farmers were having 8.10 ha of irrigated land and large farmers having 3.24 ha of irrigated land. On an average there was 22.93 ha irrigated land. The results indicated that, farmers have grown bajra (4.57 ha), brinjal (0.40 ha), chilly (1.21 ha), cotton (4.13 ha), groundnut (1.38 ha), maize (23.32 ha), onion (1.21 ha) and sugar cane (1.21 ha) in kharif season. Marginal farmers have grown bajra, cotton, groundnut and maize. Small farmers have grown bajra, maize and onion. Semi medium farmers have grown brinjal, cotton, maize and onion. Medium farmers have grown bajra, chilly, cotton, maize, onion and sugar cane. Large farmers have grown cotton, maize and onion. The results indicated that, the cropping intensity in Belur-1 micro watershed was found to be 55.74 per cent. In case of marginal farmers it was 99.63 per cent, in small farmers it was 99.70, in semi medium farmers it was 62.75, in medium farmers it was 39.99 per cent and in case of large farmers the cropping intensity was 53.33 per cent. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have bank account and 2.86 per cent possess savings. Among marginal farmers 100 percent of them possess bank account. 100 per cent of small farmers possess bank account and 12.50 per cent of them possess savings. Semi medium, medium and large category of farmers possesses 100 per cent of bank account. The results indicated that, 20 per cent of the landless, 62.50 per cent of marginal, 66.67 per cent of small, 42.86 per cent of the semi medium and 62.50 per cent of medium farmers have borrowed credit from different sources. The results indicated that, 44.44 per cent have availed loan from Grameena bank. The results indicated that, marginal, small, semi medium and medium have availed Rs. 25400, Rs. 42500, Rs. 16666.67 and Rs. 110000 respectively. Overall average credit amount availed by households in the micro watershed is 49833.33. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have borrowed loan for agriculture production. Results indicated that 100 percent of the households have unpaid their loan. The results indicated that 9.09 per cent of the households were opined that they were helped to perform timely agricultural operations, higher rate of interest and forced to sell the produce at low price to repay loan in time respectively. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for bajra was Rs. 26836.07. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 30613.70. The net income from bajra cultivation was Rs. 3777.63, thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.14. 5 The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for maize was Rs. 23553.87. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 35161.80. The net income from maize cultivation was Rs. 11607.92. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.49. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Chilly was Rs. 19910.02. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 276640. The net income from Chilly cultivation was Rs. 256729.98. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:13.89. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for groundnut was Rs. 104680.63. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 109091.66. The net income from groundnut cultivation was Rs. 4411.03. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.04. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for brinjal was Rs. 54847.38. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 111150. The net income from brinjal cultivation was Rs. 56302.62. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.03. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for cotton was Rs. 44525.95. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 104092.86. The net income from cotton cultivation was Rs. 59566.91. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.34. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for onion was Rs. 48293.62. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 126793.33. The net income from onion cultivation was Rs. 78499.71. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.63. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for sugar cane was Rs. 28816.35. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 98800. The net income from sugar cane cultivation was Rs. 69983.65. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:3.43. The results indicated that, 65.71 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder was adequate and 2.86 per cent of the households opined that green fodder was adequate. The results indicated that, in land less farmers, the average income from wage was Rs.29000. In case of marginal farmers the average income from wage was Rs.15250, agriculture was Rs.41625, dairy farm was Rs.2250 and goat farming was Rs.3750. In case of small farmers the average income from wage was Rs.20000, agriculture was Rs.47500 and dairy farm was Rs.2833.33. In semi medium farmers the average income from business was Rs.12857.14, wage was Rs.17142.86, agriculture was Rs.113000 and dairy farm was Rs.1000. In medium farmers the average annual income from wage was Rs.17142.86, agriculture was 6 Rs.46000 and dairy farm was Rs.9375. In large farmers the average annual income from wage was Rs.35000, agriculture was Rs.170000 and was Rs.8000. The results indicated that, in marginal, small, semi medium and large farmers the average expenditure from agriculture was Rs.14000, Rs.14166.67, Rs.38142.86 and Rs.56000 respectively. In medium farmers the average expenditure from agriculture was rs.21714.29 and dairy farm was Rs.7000. The results indicated that, sampled households have grown 21 coconut trees in their field. The results indicated that, households have planted 8 teak trees, 60 neem trees and 1 Peeple trees in their field. The results indicate that, households have an average additional investment capacity of Rs. 9371.43 for land development, Rs.2857.14 for irrigation facility, Rs.5514.29 for improved crop production, Rs.457.14 for improved livestock management and Rs.85.71 for orchard development and maintenance. Marginal farmers have an average additional investment capacity of Rs. 9500 for land development, Rs.2750 for irrigation facility, Rs. 5625 in improved crop production and Rs.750 for improved live stock management. Small farmers have an average additional investment capacity of Rs.9666.67 for land development, Rs.3333.33 for irrigation facility, Rs.5833.33 for improved crop production, Rs.833.33 for livestock management and Rs.500 for orchard development/maintenance. Semi medium farmers have additional investment capacity of Rs.11571.41 for land development, 3428.57 for irrigation facility and Rs.7285.71 for improved crop production. Medium farmers have an average additional investment capacity of Rs.11250 for land development, Rs.3000 for irrigation facility, Rs.6250 for improved crop production and Rs.625 for improved livestock management. Large farmers have an additional investment capacity of Rs.23000 for land development, Rs.10000 for irrigation facility and Rs.12000 for improved crop production. The results indicated that for 74.29 per cent and 14.29 per cent of the households were dependent on loan from the bank and soft loan for land development respectively. For irrigation facility 28.57 per cent of household were dependent on loan from the bank and 8.57 per cent of the household were dependent on soft loan. 62.86 per cent and 14.29 of the household were depending on loan from bank and soft loan for improved crop production respectively. 8.57 per cent of the household were dependent on loan from bank for improved livestock management.2.86 per cent of the household were dependent on loan from bank for orchard development/maintenance. The results indicated that, brinjal, chilly; cotton and onion crops were sold to the extent of 100 per cent. Bajra, groundnut and maize crops were sold to the extent of 82.50per cent, 96 per cent and 96.92 per cent. 7 The results indicated that, 100 percent of the households have sold their produce to local/village merchant. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of households used tractor as a mode of transport and 25.71 per cent of the household used truck. The results indicated that, 85.71 per cent of the households have shown interest in soil testing. The results indicated that, 82.86 per cent of the households have experienced the soil and water erosion problems i.e. 100 percent of marginal, small, semi medium farmers and large farmers and 87.50 percent of medium farmers. The results indicated that, 100 percent of the household used fire wood as a source of fuel and 20 per cent of the household used LPG as source of fuel. The results indicated that, piped supply was the major source of drinking water for 51.43 per cent of the households and 42.86 per cent of the household were using bore well as a source of drinking water. The results indicated that, electricity was the major source of light for 100 per cent of the households. The results indicated that, 45.71 per cent of the households possess sanitary toilet i.e. 40 per cent of the landless, 100 per cent of marginal, 50 per cent of small, 66.67 per cent of semi medium, 8.33 per cent of medium and 100 per cent of large farmers had sanitary toilet facility. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the sampled household's possessed BPL card. The results indicated that, 31.43 per cent of the households participated in NREGA programme which included 100 per cent of the landless, 25 per cent of the marginal farmers, 16.67 per cent of the small farmers, 12.50 per cent of the medium farmers and 100 percent of the large farmers. The results indicated that, cereals and pulses were adequate for 100 per cent of the household respectively. Vegetables, milk, egg and meat were adequate for 97.14 per cent, 80 per cent, 37.14 per cent and 14.29 per cent of the households. The results indicated that, Oilseed, vegetables, fruits, milk, egg and meat were inadequate for 25.71 per cent, 2.86 per cent, 62.86 per cent, 5.71 per cent, 62.86 per cent and 80 per cent of the household respectively. The results indicated that, oilseed and fruits were inadequate for 62.86 per cent and 14.29 per cent of the household respectively. The results indicated that, Lower fertility status of the soil was the constraint experienced by 80 per cent of the households, wild animal menace on farm field (74.29%), frequent incidence of pest and diseases (68.57%), inadequacy of irrigation water (22.86%), high cost of Fertilizers and plant protection chemicals (54.29%), high rate of interest on credit (25.71%), low price for the agricultural commodities (71.43%), lack of marketing facilities in the area (68.57%), 8 inadequate extension services (48.57 %), lack of transport for safe transport of the agricultural produce to the market (74.29%) and less rain fall (14.29%) ; Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (World Bank Funded) Sujala –III Project
Not Available ; The land resource inventory of Hosahalli-1 microwatershed was conducted using village cadastral maps and IRS satellite imagery on 1:7920 scale. The false colour composites of IRS imagery were interpreted for physiography and these physiographic delineations were used as base for mapping soils. The soils were studied in several transects and a soil map was prepared with phases of soil series as mapping units. Random checks were made all over the area outside the transects to confirm and validate the soil map unit boundaries. The soil map shows the geographic distribution and extent, characteristics, classification, behavior and use potentials of the soils in the microwatershed. The present study covers an area of 636 ha in Koppal taluk and district, Karnataka. The climate is semiarid and categorized as drought - prone with an average annual rainfall of 662 mm, of which about 424 mm is received during south–west monsoon, 161 mm during north-east and the remaining 77 mm during the rest of the year. An area of about 100 per cent is covered by soils and 150 cm) soils. An area of about 2 per cent has sandy soils, 17 per cent has loamy soils and 78 per cent has clayey soils at the surface. About 49 per cent of the area has non-gravelly (200 mm/m) in available water capacity. About 8 per cent area has nearly level (0-1%) and 89 per cent area has very gently sloping (1-3%) lands in the microwatershed. An area of about 27 per cent has soils that are slightly eroded (e1) and 70 per cent moderately eroded (e2) lands. An area of about 18 per cent are neutral (pH 6.5-7.3), 21 per cent are slightly alkaline (pH 7.3-7.8), 11 per cent are moderately alkaline (pH 7.8-8.4), 21 per cent are strongly alkaline (pH 8.4-9.0) and 25 per cent are very strongly alkaline (pH >9.0) in soil reaction. The Electrical Conductivity (EC) of the soils is 0.75%) in 7 per cent area of the soils. Available phosphorus is low (337 kg/ha) in available potassium content. Available sulphur is low (1.0 ppm) in 4.5 ppm) in 51 per cent area of the microwatershed. Available zinc is deficient (0.6 ppm) in about 3 per cent area. Available manganese and copper are sufficient in all the soils. The land suitability for 31 major agricultural and horticultural crops grown in the microwatershed were assessed and the areas that are highly suitable (S1) and moderately suitable (S2) are given below. It is however to be noted that a given soil may be suitable for various crops but what specific crop to be grown may be decided by the farmer looking to his capacity to invest on various inputs, marketing infrastructure, market price and finally the demand and supply position. Land suitability for various crops in the microwatershed Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Sorghum 10 (2) 360 (57) Sapota 10 (2) 113 (18) Maize - 369 (58) Pomegranate 10 (2) 314 (49) Bajra 70 (11) 340 (54) Musambi 10 (2) 314 (49) Groundnut 70 (11) 193 (30) Lime 10 (2) 314 (49) Sunflower 10 (2) 273 (43) Amla 70 (11) 500 (79) Red gram 10 (2) 264 (41) Cashew 10 (2) 124 (20) Bengalgram - 370 (58) Jackfruit 10 (2) 113 (18) Cotton 10 (2) 360 (57) Jamun 10 (2) 304 (48) Chilli 10 (2) 77 (12) Custard apple 70 (11) 500 (79) Tomato 10 (2) 77 (12) Tamarind 10 (2) 224 (35) Brinjal 71 (11) 453 (71) Mulberry 11 (2) 472 (74) Onion 71(11) 170 (27) Marigold 10 (2) 360 (57) Bhendi 71 (11) 453 (71) Chrysanthemum 10 (2) 360 (57) Drumstick 10 (2) 420 (66) Jasmine 10 (2) 159 (25) Mango 10 (2) 204 (32) Crossandra 10 (2) 87 (14) Guava 10 (2) 113 (18) Apart from the individual crop suitability, a proposed crop plan has been prepared for the 7 identified LMUs by considering only the highly and moderately suitable lands for different crops and cropping systems with food, fodder, fibre and other horticulture crops that helps in maintaining productivity and ecological balance in the microwatershed. Maintaining soil-health is vital for crop production and conserve soil and land resource base for maintaining ecological balance and to mitigate climate change. For this, several ameliorative measures have been suggested for these problematic soils like saline/alkali, highly eroded, sandy soils etc. Soil and water conservation treatment plan has been prepared that would help in identifying the sites to be treated and also the type of structures required. As part of the greening programme, several tree species have been suggested to be planted in marginal and submarginal lands, field bunds and also in the hillocks, mounds and ridges. That would help in supplementing the farm income, provide fodder and fuel, and generate lot of biomass which in turn would help in maintaining the ecological balance and contribute to mitigating the climate change. SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY The results indicated that 51 farmers were sampled in Hosahalli-1micro watershed among them 20(39.22%) were marginal farmers, 9 (17.65 %) were small farmers, 14(27.45 %) were semi medium farmers, 3 (5.88 %) were medium farmers and 5 (9.80 %) landless farmers were also interviewed for the survey. The data indicated that, there were 150(56.18%) men and 117 (43.82 %) were women. The average family size of landless and marginal farmer was 5, small and medium farmer was 4 and semi medium farmers were 7. On an average the family size was 5. The data indicated that 61 (22.85%) people were in 0-15 years of age, 116 (43.45 %) were in 16-35 years of age, 67 (25.09 %) were in 36-60 years of age and 23(8.61%) were above 61 years of age. The results indicated that the Hosahalli-1had 26.22 per cent illiterates, 25.09 per cent of them had primary school education, 8.99 per cent of them had both middle school, 18.73 per cent them had high school education, 7.12 per cent of them had PUC education, 0.75 per cent them had Diploma education, 2.62 per cent of them had degree education, 0.37 per cent of them had masters education and 8.61 per cent them had others. The results indicated that, 50.98 per cent of households practicing agriculture, 37.25 per cent of the household heads were agricultural labour, 9.80 per cent of the household heads were general labour and 1.96 per cent of the household heads were in private service. The results indicated that agriculture was the major occupation for 32.58 per cent of the household members, 28.84 per cent were agricultural labourers, 5.62 per cent were general labours, 0.37 percent were in government service, 1.87 per cent of them were in private sector, 20.60 per cent of them were students, 5.24 per cent of them were children and 4.12 per cent were housewives. In case of landless households 4 per cent were general labourers, 60 per cent of the household were general labour and 16 per cent were students. In case of marginal farmers 36.17 per cent were agriculturist, 27.66 percent was in agricultural labour, 2.86 per cent of them were in government service and 25.53 per cent were students. In case of small farmers 48.57 per cent of them were agriculturist, 14.29 percent was in agricultural labour and students. In case of semi medium farmers 32 per cent of the family members were agriculturist, 41 per cent of them were general labour and 17 per cent of them were students. In case of medium farmers 30.77 per cent of the family members were agriculturist and agriculture labour respectively and 38.46 per cent of them were students. The results showed that 100 per cent of the farmers have not participated in any local institutions. 2 The results indicated that 35.29 per cent of the households possess thatched house, 17.65 per cent of the households possess Katcha house, 19.61 per cent of the households possess Pacca house and 1.96 per cent of them possess Semi Pucca house. The results showed that, 94.12 per cent of the households TV, 78.43 per cent of the households possess Mixer grinder, 9.80 per cent of the households possess bicycle, 41.18 per cent of the households possess motor cycle and 96.08 per cent of the households possess mobile phones. The results showed that the average value of television was Rs. 8062, mixer grinder was Rs.1700, bicycle was Rs.2200, motor cycle was Rs.32454 and mobile phone was Rs.2014. The data showed that, 11.76 per cent of the households possess bullock cart, 21.57 per cent of them possess plough, 1.96 per cent of the households possess irrigation pump, power tiller, tractor and harvester respectively. 17.65 per cent of the households possess sprayer and 88.24 per cent of the households possess weeder. The results showed that the average value of bullock cart was Rs.17500; the average value of plough was Rs. 1545, the average value of irrigation pump was Rs. 2000, the average value of power tiller was Rs. 25000, the average value of tractor was Rs. 500000, the average value of sprayer was Rs. 4888, the average value of weeder was Rs. 107 and the average value of harvester was Rs. 100. The results indicated that, 13.73 per cent of the households possess bullocks, 21.57 per cent of the households possess local cow, 17.65 per cent of the households possess buffalo and 1.96 per cent of the households possess crossbreed cow, sheep and cow respectively. In case of marginal farmers, 5 per cent of the households possess bullock, 20 per cent of the households possess local cow, 15 per cent of the households possess buffalo and 5 per cent of the households possess goat. In small farmers 11.11 per cent of the households possess bullock and buffalo respectively. In semi medium farmers, 21.43 per cent of the households possess bullock, 50 per cent of the households possess local cow and 35.71 per cent of the households possess buffalo. In case of medium farmers 66.67 per cent of the households possess bullock and 33.33 per cent of the households possess crossbreed cow and sheep respectively. The results indicated that, average own labour men available in the micro watershed was 1.98, average own labour (women) available was 1.48, average hired labour (men) available was 8.33 and average hired labour (women) available was 6.07. In case of marginal farmers, average own labour men available was 1.65, average own labour (women) was also 1.30, average hired labour (men) was 7.05 3 and average hired labour (women) available was 5.15. In case of small farmers, average own labour men available was 1.44, average own labour (women) was 1.11, average hired labour (men) was 10.56 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.56. In case of semi medium farmers, average own labour men available was 2.86, average own labour (women) was 2.07, average hired labour (men) was 9.29 and average hired labour (women) available was 6.43. In medium farmers average own labour men available was 1.67, average own labour (women) was 1, average hired labour (men) was 5.67 and average hired labour (women) available was 6. The results indicated that, 88.24 per cent of the household opined that hired labour was adequate and 1.96 per cent of the household opined that hired labour was inadequate. The results indicated that, households of the Hosahalli-1micro watershed possess 29.69 ha (54.32 %) of dry land and 24.97 ha (45.68 %) of irrigated land. Marginal farmers possess 12.20 ha (93.14 %) of dry land and 0.90ha (6.86%) of irrigated land. Small farmers possess 6.90 ha (73 %) of dry land and 2.55 ha (27%) of irrigated land. Semi medium farmers possess 10.59 ha (45.55 %) of dry land and 12.66 ha (54.45 %) of irrigated land. Medium farmers possess 8.86 ha (100%) of irrigated land. The results indicated that, the average value of dry land was Rs. 520,124.03 and average value of irrigated was Rs. 576,373.36. In case of marginal famers, the average land value was Rs. 717,070.33 for dry land and Rs. 1,780,180.25 for irrigated land. In case of small famers, the average land value was Rs. 376,436.11 for dry land Rs. 959,033.27 for irrigated land. In case of semi medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 386,969.81 for dry land and Rs. 627,765.34 for irrigated land. In case of medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 270,684.94 for irrigated land. The results indicated that, there were 8 functioning and 11 defunctioning bore wells in the micro watershed. The results indicated that, bore well was the major irrigation source for 52.94 per cent of the farmers. The results indicated that on an average the depth of the bore well was 39.82 meters. The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers there was 0.90 ha of irrigated land, in case of small farmers there was 2.46 ha of irrigated land, semi medium farmers were having 12.59 ha of irrigated land and medium farmers were having 4.86 ha of irrigated land. On an average there were 20.81 ha of irrigated land. The results indicated that, farmers have grown bajra (7.73 ha), banana (2.55 ha), Bengal gram (3.20 ha), cotton (2.13 ha), drumstick (0.49 ha), groundnut (4.69 4 ha), maize (25.48 ha), red gram (4.33 ha), sorghum (2.47 ha) and sunflower (0.81 ha) in kharif season. Marginal farmers have grown bajra, groundnut, maize, red gram and sunflower. Small farmers have grown bajra, banana, cotton, groundnut, maize and sorghum. Semi medium farmers had grown bajra, banana, Bengal gram, cotton, drumstick, groundnut, maize, red gram and sorghum. Medium farmers have grown bengal gram, groundnut and maize. The results indicated that, the cropping intensity in Hosahalli-1micro watershed was found to be 76.18 per cent. In case of marginal farmers it was 90.63 per cent, in small farmers it was 100, in semi medium farmers it was 78.02 and in medium farmers it was 41.30 per cent. The results indicated that, 49.02 per cent of the households have bank account and 19.61 per cent of the household possess savings. Among marginal farmers 55 percent of them possess bank account and 25 percent of the households possess savings. 55.56 per cent of small farmers possess bank account and 33.33 per cent of the households possess savings. In semi medium farmers, 57.14 per cent of them possess bank account and 7.14 savings per cent of them possess and in medium category of farmers possess 33.33 per cent of bank account and also savings correspondingly. The results indicated that, 25 per cent of marginal, 44.44 per cent of small, 28.57 per cent of the semi medium and 33.33 per cent of medium farmers have borrowed credit from different sources. The results indicated that, 42.86 per cent have availed loan in commercial bank, 50 per cent have availed loan from Grameena bank and 7.14 per cent have availed loan from money lender. The results indicated that, marginal, small, semi medium and medium have availed Rs.36600, Rs. 102500 and Rs. 56250 and Rs.50000 respectively. Overall average credit amount availed by households in the micro watershed was Rs. 62000. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have borrowed loan for agriculture production. The results indicated that, 100 percent of loan was taken for health care. Results indicated that 100 per cent of the households have unpaid their institutional credit. Results indicated that 100 per cent of the households have repaid their private credit partially. The results indicated that 30.77 per cent of the households were opined that they were helped to perform timely agricultural operations and 69.23 per cent of them opined that higher rate of interest. The results indicated that 100 per cent of the households were opined that loan amount was adequate to fulfill the requirement. 5 The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for bajra was Rs. 32799.55. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 129330.43. The net income from bajra cultivation was Rs. 96530.89, thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:3.94. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for maize was Rs. 36239.86. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 44053.21. The net income from maize cultivation was Rs. 7813.34. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.22. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for groundnut was Rs. 56153.85. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 113354.28. The net income from groundnut cultivation was Rs. 57200.42. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.02. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Sunflower was Rs. 42168.76. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 30875.00. The net income from Sunflower cultivation was Rs-11293.76. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.73. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for redgram was Rs. 37564.88. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 56195.79. The net income from redgram cultivation was Rs. 18630.91. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.5. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for sorghum was Rs. 26051.69. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 41911.68. The net income from sorghum cultivation was Rs. 15859.99. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.61. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Cotton was Rs. 38511.39. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 75028.14. The net income from Cotton cultivation was Rs. 46253.24. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.61. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for banana was Rs. 143187.93. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 491750.31. The net income from banana cultivation was Rs. 348562.38. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:3.43. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Bengal gram was Rs. 42028.60. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 23304.69. The net income from Bengal gram cultivation was Rs. -18723.91. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.55. The results indicated that, 37.25 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder and green fodder were adequate. The results indicated that, in landless farmers, the average income from wage was Rs. 29000. In marginal farmers the average income from service/salary was 6 Rs.12500, wage was Rs. 19350, agriculture was Rs. 51301 and dairy farm was Rs. 1708. In small farmers the average income from service/salary was Rs. 28444.44, wage was Rs. 6666.67, agriculture was Rs. 83044.44 and dairy farm was Rs. 2777.78. In semi medium farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 15714.29, agriculture was Rs. 68200 and dairy farm was Rs.6434.29. In medium farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 11666.67 and agriculture was Rs. 75333.33. The results indicated that, in landless farmers, the average expenditure from wage was Rs. 15000. In marginal farmers the average expenditure from service/salary was Rs. 63333.33, wage was Rs. 14,205.88, agriculture was Rs. 19,636.36 and dairy farm was Rs. 6,250. In case of small farmers the average expenditure from service/salary was Rs. 92,500, wage was Rs. 13,000, agriculture was Rs. 53,888.89 and dairy farm was Rs. 12,000. In case of semi medium farmers the average expenditure from wage was Rs. 8,785.71, dairy farm was Rs. 9,600 and agriculture was Rs. 47,142.86. In case of medium farmers the average expenditure from wage was Rs.4000 and agriculture was Rs. 56,666.67. The results indicated that, sampled households have grown 9 coconut trees in their field and also planted 1 coconut tree in their back yard. The results indicated that, households have planted 55 neem trees, 8tamarind tress, 3 silver oak trees and 1 banyan trees in their field and also grown 1 Neem tree in the backyard. The results indicate that, households have an average investment capacity of Rs. 3725.49 for land development, Rs. 980.39 in irrigation facility, Rs.2372.55 for improved crop production and Rs.607.84 for improved livestock management. Marginal households have an average investment capacity of Rs. 3800 for land development, Rs. 450 for irrigation facility, Rs.2350 for improved crop production and Rs.350 for improved livestock management. Small farmers have an average investment capacity of Rs. 2000 for land development, Rs.1666.67 for improved crop production and Rs.555.56 for improved livestock management. Semi medium farmers have an average investment capacity of Rs. 6,142.86 for land development, Rs. 2,500 for irrigation facility, Rs. 3,785.71 for improved crop production and Rs. 1,142.86 for improved livestock management. Medium farmers have an average investment capacity of Rs. 3,333.33 for land development, Rs. 2,000 for irrigation facility, Rs. 2,000 for improved crop production and Rs. 1,000 for improved livestock management. The results indicated that, loan from the bank was the source of funds to, 39.22 per cent of the households for land development, 17.65 per cent of the households for irrigation facility, 41.18 per cent of the households for improved crop production and 19.61 per cent of the households for improved livestock management. 7 The results indicated that, Bajra, banana, bengal gram, cotton, drumstick, groundnut, red gram, sorghum and sunflower crops were sold to the extent of 100 per cent. Only maize was sold to the extent 97.75 per cent respectively. Results also obtained that, the average price of bajra was Rs.1457.14/q, Banana was Rs.657.50/q, Bengal gram was Rs.3750/q, cotton was Rs.4250/q, drumstick was Rs.3500/q, groundnut was Rs.3700/q, maize was Rs.1132.80/q, red gram was Rs.4542.86/q, Sorghum was Rs.3225/q and Sunflower was Rs.2500/q. The results indicated that, 13.73 percent of the households have sold their produce to agent/traders, 25.49 percent of the households have sold their produce to local/village merchant, 23.53 percent of the households sold their produce in regulated markets and 47.06 percent of the households sold their produce to cooperative marketing society. The results indicated that 13.73 per cent of the households have used cart as a mode of transport, 56.86 per cent of them have used tractor and 39.22 per cent have used truck. The results indicated that, 35.29 per cent of the households have experienced the soil and water erosion problems i.e. 45 percent of marginal farmers, 11.11 per cent of small farmers, 50 per cent of semi medium farmers and 33.33 percent of medium farmers. The results indicated that, 58.82 per cent of the households have shown interest in soil testing. The results indicated that, 92.16 percent used fire wood as a source of fuel and 7.84 percent of the households used LPG as a source of fuel. The results indicated that, piped supply was the source of drinking water for 68.63 per cent and 31.37 per cent of them were using bore well for drinking water. The results indicated that, electricity was the major source of light for 98.04per cent of the households and 1.96 per cent of the households were using kerosene lamp. The results indicated that, 33.33 per cent of the households possess sanitary toilet i.e. 40 per cent of landless, 35 per cent of marginal, 22.22 per cent of small, 35.71 per cent of semi medium and 33.33 per cent of medium had sanitary toilet facility. The results indicated that, 98.04 per cent of the sampled households possessed BPL card and 1.96 per cent of the sampled households have not possessed BPL card. The results indicated that, 27.45 per cent of the households participated in NREGA programme which included 20 per cent of the landless, 30 percent of the marginal, 33.33 per cent of the small, 14.29 per cent of the semi medium and 66.67 percent of the medium farmers. 8 The results indicated that, cereals, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits , milk, egg and meat were adequate for 100 per cent, 84.31 per cent, 23.53 per cent, 35.29 per cent, 1.96 per cent, 96.08 per cent, 84.31 per cent and 45.10 per cent of the households respectively. The results indicated that, pulses, oilseed, vegetables, fruits, milk and meat were inadequate for 15.69 per cent, 78.43 per cent, 68.63 per cent, 66.67 per cent, 3.92 per cent and 39.22 per cent of the households respectively. The results indicated that, Lower fertility status of the soil was the constraint experienced by 60.78 per cent of the households, wild animal menace on farm field (76.47%), frequent incidence of pest and diseases (33.33%), inadequacy of irrigation water (21.57%), high cost of Fertilizers and plant protection chemicals (37.25%), high rate of interest on credit (35.29%), low price for the agricultural commodities (80.39%), lack of marketing facilities in the area (80.39%), inadequate extension services (56.86%), lack of transport for safe transport of the agricultural produce to the market (60.78%), less rainfall (31.37%) and Source of Agri-technology information(Newspaper/TV/Mobile) (13.73 %). ; Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (World Bank Funded) Sujala –III Project
Not Available ; The land resource inventory of Nirligi-1 microwatershed was conducted using village cadastral maps and IRS satellite imagery on 1:7920 scale. The false colour composites of IRS imagery were interpreted for physiography and these physiographic delineations were used as base for mapping soils. The soils were studied in several transects and a soil map was prepared with phases of soil series as mapping units. Random checks were made all over the area outside the transects to confirm and validate the soil map unit boundaries. The soil map shows the geographic distribution and extent, characteristics, classification, behavior and use potentials of the soils in the microwatershed. The present study covers an area of 684 ha in Koppal taluk and district, Karnataka. The climate is semiarid and categorized as drought - prone with an average annual rainfall of 662 mm, of which about 424 mm is received during south–west monsoon, 161 mm during north-east and the remaining 77 mm during the rest of the year. An area of about 85 per cent is covered by soils and 15 per cent by habitation and water bodies, settlements and others. The salient findings from the land resource inventory are summarized briefly below. The soils belong to 12 soil series and 25 soil phases (management units) and 5 land management units. The length of crop growing period is 150 cm) soils. An area of about 12 per cent has loamy soils and 73 per cent has clayey soils at the surface. About 50 per cent of the area has non-gravelly (0.75%) in soils. Available phosphorus is low (57 kg/ha) in 9 per cent area of the microwatershed. About 26 per cent are medium (145-337 kg/ha) and 59 per cent soils are high (>337 kg/ha) in available potassium content. Available sulphur is low (20 ppm) in 1.0 ppm) in soils. Available iron is deficient (4.5 ppm) in 32 per cent area of the microwatershed. Available zinc is deficient (0.6 ppm) in about 36 per cent area. Available manganese and copper are sufficient in all the soils. The land suitability for 31 major agricultural and horticultural crops grown in the microwatershed were assessed and the areas that are highly suitable (S1) and moderately suitable (S2) are given below. It is however to be noted that a given soil may be suitable for various crops but what specific crop to be grown may be decided by the farmer looking to his capacity to invest on various inputs, marketing infrastructure, market price and finally the demand and supply position. Land suitability for various crops in the microwatershed Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Sorghum 193 (28) 78 (11) Sapota 54 (8) 41 (6) Maize 54 (8) 217 (32) Pomegranate 54 (8) 216 (32) Bajra 89 (13) 206 (30) Musambi 168 (25) 102 (15) Groundnut 68 (10) 248 (36) Lime 168 (25) 102 (15) Sunflower 168 (25) 101 (15) Amla 95 (14) 465 (68) Red gram 54 (8) 217 (32) Cashew - 27 (4) Bengalgram 139 (20) 200 (29) Jackfruit 54 (8) 41 (6) Cotton 160 (23) 111 (16) Jamun 21 (3) 226 (33) Chilli 54 (8) 41 (6) Custard apple 233 (34) 326 (48) Tomato 54 (8) 41 (6) Tamarind 21 (3) 263 (38) Brinjal 6 (1) 487 (71) Mulberry 89 (13) 327 (48) Onion - 317 (46) Marigold 54 (8) 216 (32) Bhendi - 492 (72) Chrysanthemum 54 (8) 216 (32) Drumstick 54 (8) 439 (64) Jasmine 54 (8) 41 (6) Mango 21 (3) 92 (13) Crossandra 54 (8) 156 (23) Guava 33 (5) 62 (9) Apart from the individual crop suitability, a proposed crop plan has been prepared for the 5 identified LMUs by considering only the highly and moderately suitable lands for different crops and cropping systems with food, fodder, fibre and other horticulture crops that helps in maintaining productivity and ecological balance in the microwatershed. Maintaining soil-health is vital for crop production and conserve soil and land resource base for maintaining ecological balance and to mitigate climate change. For this, several ameliorative measures have been suggested for these problematic soils like saline/alkali, highly eroded, sandy soils etc. Soil and water conservation treatment plan has been prepared that would help in identifying the sites to be treated and also the type of structures required. As part of the greening programme, several tree species have been suggested to be planted in marginal and submarginal lands, field bunds and also in the hillocks, mounds and ridges. That would help in supplementing the farm income, provide fodder and fuel, and generate lot of biomass which in turn would help in maintaining the ecological balance and contribute to mitigating the climate change. SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY Results indicated that 35 farmers were sampled in Nirligi-1 micro watershed among them 4 (11.43 %) were marginal farmers, 10 (28.57 %) were small farmers, 3 (8.57 %) were semi medium farmers, 12 (34.29%) were medium farmers, 1(2.86%) was large farmer and 5 (14.29 %) landless farmers were also interviewed for the survey. The data indicated that there were 170 population households in the studied micro watershed. Among them 85 (50%) men and 85(50 %) were women. The average family size of landless, marginal, small and large farmers was 5, semi medium and medium farmer was 6. The data indicated that 39 (22.94%) people were in 0-15 years of age, 73 (42.94 %) were in 16-35 years of age, 51 (30 %) were in 36-60 years of age and 7 (4.12%) were above 61 years of age. The results indicated that the Nirligi-1 had 23.53 per cent illiterates, 32.35 per cent of them had primary school education, 11.18 per cent of them had middle school, 11.76 per cent of them had high school education, 12.94 per cent of them had PUC education, 1.18 per cent of them had diploma and ITI education, 4.12 per cent of them had degree education and 0.59 per cent them had masters. The results indicated that, 71.43 per cent of households practicing agriculture, 20 per cent of the household heads were agricultural labour and 2.86 per cent of them were general labour, in government service and housewives respectively. The results indicated that agriculture was the occupation for 51.18 per cent of the household members, 10.59 per cent were agricultural labourers, 0.59 per cent of them were general labour, in government service, housewives and children's respectively. 4.71 per cent were in private service and 30 per cent were students. In case of landless farmers, 45.45 per cent were agricultural labour and students respectively. In case of marginal farmers 55 per cent were agriculturist, 10 percent was in private service and 25 per cent were students. In case of small farmers 65.79 per cent of them were agriculturist, 2.63 per cent of them were private service and 31.58 per cent of them were students. In case of semi medium farmers 64.71 per cent of the family members were agriculturist, 11.76 per cent were in private service and 23.53 per cent of them were students. In case of medium farmers 56.52 per cent of the family members were agriculturist, 10.14 per cent of them were general labours, 1.14 per cent were in government service, 4.35 per cent were in private service and 26.09 per cent were students. In case of large farmers 25 per cent of the family members were agriculturist, agriculture labour and 50 per cent of them were students. 2 The results showed that 1.76 per cent of the household participated in self help group, 0.59 per cent of the households participated in user group and 97.65 per cent of them have not participated in any local institutions. The results indicated that 34.29 per cent of the households possess Katcha house, 42.86 per cent of the household possess thatched house and 22.86 per cent of the households possess Pucca house. The results showed that, 94.29 per cent of the households possess TV, 91.43 per cent of the households possess Mixer grinder, 34.29 per cent of the households possess bicycle, 42.86 per cent of the household possess motor cycle and 100 per cent of the households possess mobile. The results showed that the average value of television was Rs.4757; the average value of television was mixer grinder was Rs.1312, the average value of television was bicycle was Rs. 1333, the average value of television was motor cycle was Rs.34333 and the average value of television was mobile phone was Rs.1569. Data showed that 25.71 per cent of the households possess bullock cart, 31.43 per cent of them possess plough, 2.86 per cent of the households possess power tiller and tractor, 17.14 per cent of the households possess sprayer, 100 per cent of the households possess weeder, 2.86 per cent of them possess thresher and 11.43 per cent of them possess chaff cutter. The results showed that the average value of bullock cart was Rs.18222; the average value of plough was Rs. 970, the average value of power tiller was Rs. 25000, the average value of tractor was Rs. 600000, the average value of sprayer was Rs. 4666, the average value of weeder was Rs.30, the average value of thresher was Rs.15000 and the average value of chaff cutter was Rs. 3000. The results indicated that, 34.29 per cent of the households possess bullocks, 20 per cent of the households possess local cow and 2.86 per cent of the household possess cross bread cow and buffalo respectively. The results indicated that, average own labour men available in the micro watershed was 1.67, average own labour (women) available was 1.47, average hired labour (men) available was 10.87 and average hired labour (women) available was 10.77. In case of marginal farmers, average own labour men available was 1.75, average own labour (women) was also 1.25, average hired labour (men) was 9.50 and average hired labour (women) available was 8.50. In case of small farmers, average own labour men available was 1.20, average own labour (women) was 1.40, average hired labour (men) was 15.40 and average hired labour (women) available was 14.40. In case of semi medium farmers, average own labour men available was 1.67, average own labour (women) was 1.33, average hired labour (men) was 14 and average hired labour (women) available was also 14. In medium farmers average own labour men available was 2.08, average own labour 3 (women) was 1.67, average hired labour (men) was 7.08 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.92. In large farmers average own labour men available was 1, average own labour (women) was 1, average hired labour (men) was 7 and average hired labour (women) available was 8. The data showed that, in case of landless farmers 20 per cent of the household possess bullock and local cow. In case of marginal farmers, 25 per cent of the households possess bullock. In case of small farmers, 50 per cent of households possess bullock. In case of semi medium farmers, 33.33 per cent of the households possess cross bread cow. In medium farmers, 41.67 per cent of the households possess bullock, 50 per cent of the household possess local cow and 8.33 per cent of the household possess buffalo. The results indicated that, 88.57 per cent of the household opined that hired labour was adequate. The results indicated that, households of the Nirligi-1 micro watershed possess 29.29 ha (43.12%) of dry land and 38.64 ha (56.88%) of irrigated land. Marginal farmers possess 2.65 ha (84.52 %) of dry land and 0.49ha (15.48%) of irrigated land. Small farmers possess 12.90 ha (94.10 %) of dry land and 0.81 ha (5.90%) of irrigated land. Semi medium farmers possess 0.41 ha (11.31%) of dry land and 3.24 ha (88.69%) of irrigated land. Medium farmers possess 4.48 ha (12.55%) of dry land and 31.21 ha (87.45%) of irrigated land and large farmers possess 8.85 ha (75.33%) of dry land and 2.90 ha (24.67 %) of irrigated land. The results indicated that, the average value of dry land was Rs. 225,259.29 and average value of irrigated was Rs. 408,356.92. In case of marginal famers, the average land value was Rs. 527,938.93 for dry land and Rs. 1,029,166.63 for irrigated land. In case of small famers, the average land value was Rs. 186,005.65 for dry land and Rs. 741,000 for irrigated land. In case of semi medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 1,937,254.94 for dry land and was Rs. 586,625 for irrigated land. In case of medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 178,501.79 for dry land and was Rs. 371,573.08 for irrigated land. In large farmers the average land value was Rs. 135,590.12 for dry land and Rs. 172,486.04 for irrigated land. The results indicated that, there were 10 functioning and 3 de-functioning bore wells in the micro watershed. The results indicated that, bore well was the major irrigation source for 28.57 per cent of the farmers, 5.71 per cent of households were using canal as a source of irrigation and 2.86 per cent of the farmers were using tank for irrigation. The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers there was 0.49 ha of irrigated land and semi medium farmers were having 1.21 ha of irrigated land and medium farmers having 28.57 ha irrigated land. On an average there were 30.57 ha of irrigated land. 4 The results indicated that, farmers have grown bajra (4.20 ha), cotton (6.88 ha), groundnut (5.75 ha), maize (30.73 ha), navane (2.43 ha), onion (3.32 ha), red gram (1.34 ha) and sunflower (0.81 ha) in kharif season. Marginal and small farmers have grown groundnut, maize, onion and sunflower. Semi medium farmers have grown bajra, cotton and onion. Medium farmers have grown bajra, cotton, groundnut, maize and onion. Large farmers have grown bajra and navane. The results indicated that, the cropping intensity in Nirligi-1 micro watershed was found to be 72.63 per cent. In case of marginal and small farmers cropping intensity was 100 per cent, in case of semi medium farmers it was 99.56 per cent, in medium farmers it was 61.06 per cent and in case of large farmers it was 74.53 per cent. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have bank account and 42.86 per cent of having savings. Among land less farmers 100 per cent of the household possess bank account; marginal farmers 100 percent of them possess both bank account and 75 per cent of the household possess savings. 100 per cent of small, farmers possess per cent of bank account and 90 per cent possess savings, in semi medium farmers 100 per cent of the farmers possess bank account and 66.67 per cent savings, in case of medium farmers 100 per cent of the farmers possess bank account and 8.33 per cent of them possess savings and large category of farmers possess 100 per cent of bank account. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of marginal, small, semi medium and large farmers and 66.67 per cent of the medium farmers have borrowed credit from different sources. The results indicated that, 23.08 per cent have availed loan in commercial bank, 3.85 per cent have availed loan from Cooperative Bank, money lender and SHGs/CBOs respectively. 38.46 per cent have availed loan from Grameena bank and 15.38 per cent of the household's availed loan from friends/relatives. The results indicated that, marginal, small, semi medium, medium and large farmers have availed Rs. 130000, Rs. 79000, Rs. 178333.33, Rs. 66,250 and Rs.50000 respectively. Overall average credit amount availed by households in the micro watershed is 94807.69. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have borrowed loan for agriculture production. The results indicated that, 85.71per cent of the households have borrowed loan for agriculture production and 14.29 per cent of the household barrowed money for household consumption. . Results indicated that 82.35 percent of the households have unpaid their institutional loan and 17.65 per cent of them fully paid their institutional loan. 5 Results indicated that 14.29 percent of the households have partially paid their private credit and 85.71 per cent of the households have unpaid their private credit. The results indicated that 23.53 per cent of the households were opined that they were helped to perform timely agricultural operations and 11.76 per cent opined that higher rate of interest. The results indicated that 14.29 per cent of the households were opined that loan amount was adequate to fulfill the requirement and 28.57 per cent opined that higher rate of interest. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for bajra was Rs. 34996.06. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 26639.98. The net income from bajra cultivation was Rs. -8356.08. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.76. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for cotton was Rs. 27652.39. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 94691.73. The net income from cotton cultivation was Rs. 67039.34. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:3.42. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for groundnut was Rs. 30764.01. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 50101.70. The net income from groundnut cultivation was Rs. 19337.69. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.63. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for maize was Rs. 161340.12. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 30924.25. The net income from maize cultivation was Rs. -130415.87. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.19. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for navane was Rs. 11505.44. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 22230. The net income from navane cultivation was Rs. 10724.56. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.93. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for red gram was Rs. 19733.93. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 38835.54. The net income from red gram cultivation was Rs. 19101.62. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.97. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for onion was Rs. 37429.69. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 104434.69. The net income from onion cultivation was Rs. 67005. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.79. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for sunflower was Rs. 26987.81. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 50388. The net 6 income from sunflower cultivation was Rs. 23400.19. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.87. The results indicated that, 57.14 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder was adequate and 8.57 per cent of the households opined that green fodder was adequate. The table indicated that the in case of landless farmers the average annual income from wage was Rs.28000 and dairy farm was Rs.600, in marginal farmers, average income from service/salary was Rs.3750, business was Rs.60000, wage was Rs.27500 and agriculture Rs. 46950. In case of small farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 81700 and agriculture was Rs.47610. In semi medium farmers the average income from service/salary was Rs.33333.33, wage was Rs.6000 and agriculture was Rs.97666.67. Medium farmer's average income from service/salary was Rs.5000, business was Rs.1666.67, wage was Rs.15666.67, agriculture was Rs.99166.67 and dairy farm was Rs.4416.67. Similarly in large farmers the average income from wage was Rs.20000 and agriculture was Rs.110000. The results indicated that, in case of marginal, the average annual expenditure from business was Rs. 170000 and agriculture was Rs.26750. In case of small farmers the average annual expenditure from agriculture was Rs. 25300. In case of semi medium farmers the average expenditure from agriculture was Rs.55666.67 and dairy farm was Rs. 17000. In medium farmers the average annual expenditure from business was Rs.12000 and agriculture was Rs.45818.18.In large farmers the average expenditure from agriculture was Rs. 50000. The results indicate that, households have an average additional investment capacity of Rs. 3285.71 for land development and Rs. 1600 in irrigation facility, Rs.1742.86 for improved crop production and Rs.142.86 for improved livestock management. Marginal farmers have an average additional investment capacity of Rs. 2500 for land development and Rs. 2000 in improved crop production. Medium farmers have an average additional investment capacity of Rs.7500 for land development, Rs.4000 for irrigation facility, Rs. 4416.67 for improved crop production and Rs. 416.67 for improved livestock management. Large farmers have an average additional investment of Rs.15000 for land development and have an investment capacity of Rs. 8000 for irrigation facility. The results indicated that for 5.71 per cent and 20 per cent of the households were dependent on loan from the bank and soft loan for land development respectively. For irrigation facility 14.29 per cent of household were dependent on loan from the bank and 5.71 per cent of the household were dependent on soft loan. 11.43 per cent of the household were depending on loan from bank and soft loan for 7 improved crop production respectively. 2.86 per cent of the household were dependent on loan from bank for improved livestock management. The results indicated that, bajra, cotton, groundnut, navane, onion, red gram and sunflower crops were sold to the extent of 100 per cent. Only maize was sold to the extent of 93.79 per cent. The results indicated that, 88.57 percent of the households have sold their produce to local/village merchant and 22.86 percent of the households have sold their produce to regulated market. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of households used tractor as a mode of transport. The results indicated that, 85.71 per cent of the households have shown interest in soil testing. The results indicated that, 42.86 per cent of the households have experienced the soil and water erosion problems i.e. 25 percent of marginal farmers, 33.33 per cent of semi medium farmers, 100 percent of medium farmers and 100 per cent of the large farmers. The results indicated that, 91.43 percent of the household used fire wood as a source of fuel, 2.86 per cent of the household used kerosene and 25.71 per cent of the household used LPG as source of fuel. The results indicated that, piped supply was the major source of drinking water for 60 per cent of the households and 40 per cent of the household were using bore well as a source of drinking water. The results indicated that, electricity was the major source of light for 100 per cent of the households. The results indicated that, 45.71 per cent of the households possess sanitary toilet i.e. 40 per cent of the landless, 100 per cent of marginal, 50 per cent of small, 66.67 per cent of semi medium, 8.33 per cent of medium and 100 per cent of large farmers had sanitary toilet facility. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the sampled household's possessed BPL card. The results indicated that, 91.43 per cent of the households participated in NREGA programme which included 20 per cent of the landless and 100 percent of the marginal, small, semi medium, medium farmers and large farmers. The results indicated that, cereals and pulses were adequate for 97.14 per cent of the household respectively. Oilseed were adequate for 2.86 per cent of the households, vegetables were adequate for 77.14 per cent of the households, milk were adequate for 88.57 per cent of the households, egg were adequate for 57.14 per cent of the households and meat were adequate for 25.71 per cent of the household. 8 The results indicated that, cereals and pulses were inadequate for 2.86 per cent of the household. Oilseed, vegetables, fruits, milk, egg and meat were inadequate for 57.14 per cent, 22.86 per cent, 74.29 per cent, 5.71 per cent, 42.86 per cent and 71.43 per cent of the household respectively. . The results indicated that, oilseed and fruits were inadequate for 40 per cent and 25.71 per cent of the household respectively. The results indicated that, Lower fertility status of the soil was the constraint experienced by 82.86 per cent of the households, wild animal menace on farm field (68.57%), frequent incidence of pest and diseases (54.29%), inadequacy of irrigation water (57.14%), high cost of Fertilizers and plant protection chemicals (48.57%), high rate of interest on credit (48.57%), low price for the agricultural commodities (77.14%), lack of marketing facilities in the area (62.86%), inadequate extension services (57.14 %), lack of transport for safe transport of the agricultural produce to the market (48.57%) and less rain fall (11.43%) . ; Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (World Bank Funded) Sujala –III Project
Not Available ; The land resource inventory of Timmapur-2 microwatershed was conducted using village cadastral maps and IRS satellite imagery on 1:7920 scale. The false colour composites of IRS imagery were interpreted for physiography and these physiographic delineations were used as base for mapping soils. The soils were studied in several transects and a soil map was prepared with phases of soil series as mapping units. Random checks were made all over the area outside the transects to confirm and validate the soil map unit boundaries. The soil map shows the geographic distribution and extent, characteristics, classification, behavior and use potentials of the soils in the microwatershed. The present study covers an area of 501 ha in Koppal taluk and district, Karnataka. The climate is semiarid and categorized as drought - prone with an average annual rainfall of 662 mm, of which about 424 mm is received during south–west monsoon, 161 mm during north-east and the remaining 77 mm during the rest of the year. An area of about 84 per cent is covered by soils, 14 per cent by rock outcrops and 2 per cent by water bodies, settlements and others. The salient findings from the land resource inventory are summarized briefly below. The soils belong to 12 soil series and 21 soil phases (management units) and 5 Land management units. The length of crop growing period is 150 cm) soils. About 43 per cent area has clayey soils at the surface and 41 per cent loamy soils at the surface. About 13 per cent of the area has non-gravelly (0.75%) in organic carbon. Available phosphorus is medium (23-57 kg/ha) in about 71 per cent and high (>57 kg/ha) in about 13 per cent area of the microwatershed. About 65 per cent of the soils are low (337 kg/ha) in available potassium content. Available sulphur is low (320 ppm) in 11 per cent soils. Available boron is low (0.5 ppm) in about 83 per cent area and 4.5 ppm) in the entire area. Available zinc is deficient (0.6 ppm) in about 42 per cent area. Available manganese and copper are sufficient in all the soils. The land suitability for 31 major agricultural and horticultural crops grown in the microwatershed were assessed and the areas that are highly suitable (S1) and moderately suitable (S2) are given below. It is however to be noted that a given soil may be suitable for various crops but what specific crop to be grown may be decided by the farmer looking to his capacity to invest on various inputs, marketing infrastructure, market price and finally the demand and supply position. Land suitability for various crops in the microwatershed Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Sorghum - 160 (32) Sapota - 19 (4) Maize - 159 (32) Pomegranate - 78 (15) Bajra - 200 (40) Musambi - 78 (15) Groundnut - 107 (21) Lime - 78 (15) Sunflower - 75 (15) Amla - 237 (47) Red gram - 66 (13) Cashew - 36 (7) Bengalgram - 176 (35) Jackfruit - 19 (4) Cotton - 160 (32) Jamun - 69 (14) Chilli - 101 (20) Custard apple - 237 (47) Tomato - 101 (20) Tamarind - 66 (13) Brinjal 16 (3) 135 (27) Mulberry - 113 (23) Onion 16 (3) 62 (12) Marigold - 159 (32) Bhendi 16 (3) 120 (24) Chrysanthemum - 159 (32) Drumstick - 93 (18) Jasmine - 101 (20) Mango - 16 (3) Crossandra - 110 (22) Guava - 19 (4) Apart from the individual crop suitability, a proposed crop plan has been prepared for the 5identified LMUs by considering only the highly and moderately suitable lands for different crops and cropping systems with food, fodder, fibre and other horticulture crops that helps in maintaining productivity and ecological balance in the microwatershed. Maintaining soil-health is vital for crop production and conserve soil and land resource base for maintaining ecological balance and to mitigate climate change. For this, several ameliorative measures have been suggested for these problematic soils like saline/alkali, highly eroded, sandy soils etc. Soil and water conservation treatment plan has been prepared that would help in identifying the sites to be treated and also the type of structures required. As part of the greening programme, several tree species have been suggested to be planted in marginal and submarginal lands, field bunds and also in the hillocks, mounds and ridges. That would help in supplementing the farm income, provide fodder and fuel, and generate lot of biomass which in turn would help in maintaining the ecological balance and contribute to mitigating the climate change. SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY The results indicated that 35 farmers were sampled in Timmapur-2 microwatershed among them 4 (11.43%) were marginal farmers, 14 (40%) were small farmers, 8 (22.86 %) were semi medium farmers, 4 (11.43%) were medium farmers and 5 (14.29%) landless farmers were also interviewed for the survey. The data indicated that there were 191 population households were there in the studied micro watershed. Among them 106 (55.50%) men and 85 (44.50 %) were women. The average family size of landless was 6, marginal farmer was 4, small and semi medium farmers were 5 and medium farmers were 7. On an average the family size was 5. The data indicated that 40 (20.94%) people were in 0-15 years of age, 91 (47.64 %) were in 16-35 years of age, 47 (24.61 %) were in 36-60 years of age and 13 (6.81%) were above 61 years of age. The results indicated that the Timmapur-2 had 37.17 per cent illiterates, 35.08 per cent of them had primary school education, 8.38 per cent of them had middle school, 11.52 per cent of them had high school education, 5.76 per cent of them had PUC education, 0.52 had diploma education and 1.05 per cent of them had degree education. The results indicated that, 80 per cent of households practicing agriculture, 17.14 per cent of the household heads were agricultural labour and 5.71 per cent of the household heads were general labour. The results indicated that agriculture was the major occupation for 45.55 per cent of the household members, 24.61 per cent were agricultural labourers, 4.71 per cent were general labours and 23.56 per cent of them were students. In case of landless farmers 54.84 per cent of them were agriculture labours, 29.03 per cent of them were general labour and 12.90 per cent of them were students. The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers 58.82 per cent of them were doing agriculture, 17.65 per cent of them were agriculture labour and 23.53 per cent of them were students. In small farmers 51.35 per cent of them were doing agriculture, 20.27 per cent of them were agriculture labour and 28.38 per cent of them were student. In case of semi medium farmers, 76. 92 per cent of them were agriculturist, 10.26 per cent of them were agriculture labour and students. In medium farmers 30 per cent of them were agriculturist, 26.67 per cent of them were agricultural labour and 40 per cent of them were students. The results showed that 100 per cent of them have not participated in any local institutions. The results indicated that 45.71 per cent of the households possess thatched house, 42.86 per cent of the households possess Katcha house and 11.43 per cent of the households possess Pucca house. 2 The results showed that, 100 per cent of the households possess TV, 91.43 per cent of the households possess mixer/grinder, 42.86 per cent of the households possess bicycle, 37.14 per cent of the households possess motor cycle and 97.14 per cent of the households possess mobile phones. The results showed that the average value of television was Rs. 6800, mixer/grinder was Rs. 1656, bicycle was Rs.1750, motor cycle was Rs.29230 and mobile phone was Rs.1544. The data showed that about 28.57 per cent of the households possess bullock cart, 45.71 per cent of them possess plough, 2.86 per cent of the households possess tractor, 25.71 per cent of the households possess sprayer, 94.29 per cent of the households possess weeder and 11.43 per cent of the households possess chaff cutter. The results showed that the average value of bullock cart was Rs.16800; the average value of plough was Rs. 910, the average value of tractor was Rs. 500000, the average value of sprayer was Rs. 3500, the average value of weeder was Rs. 59 and the average value of chaff cutter was Rs. 2325. The results indicated that, 45.71 per cent of the households possess bullocks and 28.57 per cent of the households possess local cow. In case of marginal farmers, 25 per cent of the households possess bullock. In case of small farmers, 50 per cent of households possess bullock and 28.57 per cent possess local cow. In case of semi medium farmers, 62.50 per cent of the households possess bullock and 50 per cent of the households possess local cow. 75 medium farmers possess bullock and 50 farmers possess local. The results indicated that, average own labour men available in the micro watershed was 2.13, average own labour (women) available was 1.65, average hired labour (men) available was 8.35 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.16. The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers, average own labour men available was 2, average own labour (women) was also 1.25, average hired labour (men) was 6.50 and average hired labour (women) available was 5.25. In case of small farmers, average own labour men available was 2, average own labour (women) was 1.71, average hired labour (men) was 9.71 and average hired labour (women) available was 8.21. In case of semi medium farmers, average own labour men available was 2.38, average own labour (women) was 1.50, average hired labour (men) was 9.13 and average hired labour (women) available was 7.50. In medium farmers average own labour men available was 2.25, average own labour (women) was 2, average hired labour (men) was 6 and average hired labour (women) available was 6.50. The results indicated that, 88.57 per cent of the household opined that the hired labour was adequate. The results indicated that, households of the Timmapur-2 microwatershed possess 20.72 ha (45.57%) of dry land and 24.75 ha (54.43%) of irrigated land. Marginal 3 farmers possess 2.51 ha (86.11%) of dry land and 0.40 ha (13.89%) of irrigated land. Small farmers possess 16.19 ha (86.21 %) of dry land and 2.59 ha (13.79 %) of irrigated land. Semi medium farmers possess 0.81 ha (6.97 %) of dry land and 10.81 ha (93.03%) of irrigated land. Medium farmers possess 1.21 ha (9.98%) of dry land and 10.95 ha (90.02%) irrigated land. The results indicated that, the average value of dry land was Rs. 390,761.72 and average value of irrigated was Rs. 501,592.55. In case of marginal famers, the average land value was Rs. 597,580.64 for dry land and Rs. 1,976,000 for irrigated land. In case of small famers, the average land value was Rs. 333,450 for dry land Rs. 810,468.74 for irrigated land. In case of semi medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 741,000 for dry land and Rs. 573,558.06 for irrigated land. In case of medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 494,000 for dry land and Rs. 303,045.09 for irrigated land. The results indicated that, there were 19 functioning bore wells in the micro watershed. The results indicated that, bore well was the major irrigation source for 54.29 per cent of the farmers. The results indicated that on an average the depth of the bore well was 45.37 meters. The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers there was 0.40 per cent of irrigated land, in case of small farmers there was 2.59 ha of irrigated land, in case of semi medium farmers there was 12.02 ha of irrigated land and medium farmers were having 6.11 ha of irrigated land. On an average there were 21.13 ha of irrigated land. The results indicated that, farmers have grown bajra (4.45 ha), chilly (1.21 ha), cotton (2.91 ha), groundnut (8.22 ha), horsegram (1.21 ha), maize (14.40 ha), paddy (4.57 ha), sesamum (0.81 ha), sorghum (1.21 ha), sunflower (0.81 ha) and tomato (1.21 ha) in kharif season. Marginal farmers have grown groundnut, maize and sesamum. Small farmers have grown bajra, cotton, groundnut, horsegram, maize and sorghum. Semi medium farmers have grown chilly, cotton, groundnut, maize, paddy and tomato. Medium farmers have grown cotton, groundnut, maize, paddy and sunflower. The results indicated that, the cropping intensity in Timmapur-2 microwatershed was found to be 98.07 per cent. In case of marginal farmers, small farmers and medium farmers it was 100 per cent and in semi medium farmers it was 93.03 per cent. The results indicated that, 94.29 per cent of the households have bank account and 48.57 per cent of the households have savings. 60per cent of the landless farmers have bank account. In marginal farmers 100 per cent of them have bank account and 50 per cent of them had savings. In case of small farmers 100 per cent of them had bank account and 71.43 per cent possess savings. In case of semi medium farmers, 4 100 per cent of possess bank account and 62.50 per cent farmer's savings. In Medium farmers, 100 per cent of farmers possess bank account. The results indicated that 54.29 per cent of the farmers have borrowed credit from different sources which includes 75 per cent of marginal, 57.14 per cent of small, 75 per cent of semi medium and 50 per cent of medium farmers. The results indicated that, 31.58 per cent have availed loan in commercial bank, 15.79 per cent have availed loan in cooperative Bank, 5.26 per cent have availed loan from friends/relatives, 89.47 per cent have availed loan in Grameena bank, 42.11per cent have availed loan from money lender and 10.53 per cent have availed loan in SHGs/CBOs. The results indicated that, marginal, small, semi medium and medium have availed Rs. 55,000, Rs. 110,062.50, Rs. 74,166.67 and Rs, 195,000 respectively. Overall average credit amount availed by households in the micro watershed was Rs. 108,447.37. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have borrowed loan for agriculture production. The results indicated that, 27.27 per cent of the household's barrowed private credit for agriculture production which includes 40 per cent of the small and 50 per cent of the semi medium farmers. Results indicated that 19.23 per cent of households were partially paid their loan, 61.54 per cent of households were unpaid their loan and 19.23 per cent of households were fully paid their loan. Results indicated that 63.64 per cent of the households have partially paid their loan, 27.27 per cent have unpaid their private credit and 9.09 per cent of the households have fully paid their loan. The results indicated that 30.77 per cent of the households were opined that helped to perform timely agricultural operations, 46.15 per cent of the households were opined that higher rate of interest, 7.69 per cent of the households were opined that they were forced to sell the produce at low price to repay loan in time . The results indicated that, 9.09 per cent of the households were opined that helped to perform timely agricultural operations and higher rate of interest and 36.36 per cent of the households were not given any opinion. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for maize was Rs. 27597.79. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 29830.49. The net income from maize cultivation was Rs. 2232.71. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.08. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for groundnut was Rs. 61186.58. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 75699.47. The net income from groundnut cultivation was Rs. 14512.89. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.24. 5 The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for paddy was Rs. 62877.74. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 73035.07. The net income from paddy cultivation was Rs. 10157.34. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.16. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for bajra was Rs. 17933.64. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 25454.72. The net income from bajra cultivation was Rs. 7521.08. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.42. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for tomato was Rs. 28537.03. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 103740. The net income from tomato cultivation was Rs. 75202.97. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:3.64. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for horsegram was Rs. 11451.45. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 26840.67. The net income from horsegram cultivation was Rs. 15389.22. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.34. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for cotton was Rs. 28542.16. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 71784.37. The net income from cotton cultivation was Rs. 43242.21. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.52. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for sunflower was Rs. 34933.39. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 63232. The net income from sunflower cultivation was Rs. 28298.61. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.81. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for chilly was Rs. 23059.20. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 181133.33. The net income from chilly cultivation was Rs. 158074.14. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:7.86. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for sorghum was Rs. 13146.50. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 34382.40. The net income from sorghum cultivation was Rs. 21235.90. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.62. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for sesamum was Rs. 15380.78. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 21612.50. The net income from sesamum cultivation was Rs. 6231.72. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.41. The results indicated that, 62.86 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder was adequate and 34.29 per cent of the households opined that green fodder was adequate. The table indicated that, in landless farmers, the average income from wage was Rs. 26000. In marginal farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 26071.43 and agriculture was Rs. 37600. In small farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 6 26071.43, agriculture was Rs. 49050 and dairy farm was Rs. 2112.14. In semi medium farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 14,375, agriculture was Rs. 117,562.50 and dairy farm was Rs.625. In medium farmers the average income from wage was Rs. 15000, agriculture was Rs. 71500 and dairy farm was Rs. 750. The results indicated that, in landless farmers, the average expenditure from wage was Rs. 13000, in marginal farmers the average expenditure from wage was Rs.5666.67 and agriculture was Rs.14750. In case of small farmers the average expenditure from wage was Rs. 11111.11, agriculture was Rs. 23285.71 and dairy farm was Rs. 10,000. In case of semi medium farmers the average expenditure from wage was Rs. 5750, agriculture was Rs. 47875 and dairy farm was Rs.1000. In case of medium farmers the average expenditure from wage was Rs. 3,000 and agriculture was Rs. 35,000. The results indicated that, sampled households have grown 20 coconut and 49 mango trees in their field. The results indicated that, households have planted 50 neem, 6 tarmind, 1 banyan and 1 peeple trees in their field. The results indicate that, households have an average investment capacity of Rs.2257.14 for land development, Rs. 1171.43 in irrigation facility, Rs.1314.29 for improved crop production, Rs.600 for improved livestock management and Rs.142.86 for subsidiary enterprises. The data showed that Marginal households have an average investment capacity of Rs. 2500 for land development, Rs. 1500 for irrigation facility and Rs.1250 for improved crop production. Small farmers have an average investment capacity of Rs. 2357.14 for land development, Rs. 785.71 in irrigation facility, Rs.1642.86 for improved crop production and Rs.357.14 for improved livestock management. Semi medium farmers have an average investment capacity of Rs. 2000 for land development, Rs. 1750 in irrigation facility, Rs.1250 for improved crop production and Rs.750 for improved livestock management. Medium farmers have an average investment capacity of Rs. 5000 for land development, Rs. 2500 for irrigation facility, Rs.2000 for improved crop production, Rs.2500 for improved livestock management and Rs.1250 for subsidiary enterprises. The results indicated that, for land development, 20 per cent were depending on loan from the bank and 2.86 per cent of the households were depending on soft loan. For irrigation facility 5.71 per cent of the households were dependent on loan from bank and 11.43 per cent were depending on soft loan. Similarly for improved crop production, 5.71 per cent of the households were dependent on loan from the bank, 2.86 per cent were dependent on their own funds and 14.29 per cent of the households were depending on soft loan. For improved livestock management 2.86 per cent were dependent on own funds and 11.43 per cent were dependent on soft loan. For subsidiary enterprises 2.86 per cent of the households were dependent on soft loan. 7 The results indicated that, chilli, cotton, horsegram, sesamum, sorghum, sunflower and tomato crops were sold to the extent of 100 per cent. Bajra, groundnut, maize and paddy were sold to the extent of 85.71 per cent, 96.27 per cent, 97.23 per cent and 94.33 per cent respectively. The results indicated that, 62.86 percent of the households have sold their produce to local/village merchant, 31.43 percent of the households sold their produce in regulated markets and 14.29 percent of the households sold their produce in cooperative marketing society. The results indicated that 11.43 per cent of the households have used cart as a mode of transport, 57.14 per cent of them have used tractor and 40 per cent have used truck as a mode of transport. The results indicated that, 42.86 per cent of the households have experienced the soil and water erosion problems i.e. 50 percent of marginal farmers, 42.86 per cent of small farmers, 37.50 per cent of semi medium farmers and 100 percent of medium farmers. The results indicated that, 82.86 per cent of the households have shown interest in soil testing including 100 per cent of marginal farmers, small farmers and medium farmers and 87.50 per cent of the semi medium farmers respectively. The results indicated that, 100 percent used fire wood as a source of fuel and 2.86 per cent of the households used LPG. The results indicated that, piped supply was the source of drinking water for 82.86 per cent of the households and 17.14 per cents of the households were using bore well for drinking water. The results indicated that, electricity was the major source of light for 100 per cent of the households. The results indicated that, 31.43 per cent of the households possess sanitary toilet i.e. 20 per cent of landless, 100 per cent of marginal, 21.43 per cent of small, 25 per cent of semi medium and 25 per cent of medium farmers had sanitary toilet facility. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the sampled households possessed BPL card. The results indicated that, 42.86 per cent of the households participated in NREGA programme which included 60 per cent of the landless, 100 percent of the marginal, 21.43 per cent of the small, 12.50 per cent of the semi medium and 100 percent of the medium farmers. The results indicated that, cereals, pulses, oilseeds, milk, egg and meat were adequate for 94.29 per cent, 60 per cent, 5.71 per cent, 85.71 per cent, 80 per cent, and 65.71 per cent respectively. Vegetables and fruits were adequate for 48.57 per cent of the households. 8 The results indicated that, cereals, pulses, oilseed, vegetables, fruits, milk, egg and meat were inadequate for 5.71 per cent, 40 per cent, 80 per cent, 42.86 per cent, 40 per cent, 5.71 per cent, 17.14 per cent and 31.43 per cent respectively. The results indicated that, Lower fertility status of the soil was experienced by 85.71 per cent of the households, wild animal menace on farm field was experienced by 74.29 per cent of the households, frequent incidence of pest and diseases was experienced by 65.71 per cent of the farmers, inadequacy of irrigation water was experienced by 42.86 per cent of the households, high cost of Fertilizers and plant protection chemicals was experienced by 65.71 per cent of the households, high rate of interest on credit was experienced by 60 per cent of the farmers, low price for the agricultural commodities was experienced by 60 per cent of the farmers, lack of marketing facilities in the area was experienced 65.71 per cent of the households, inadequate of extension services experienced by 65.71 per cent of the households, lack of transport for safe transport of the agricultural produce to the market was experienced by 74.29 per cent of the households and less rainfall was experienced by 25.71 per cent of the farmers. ; Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (World Bank Funded) Sujala –III Project
Not Available ; The land resource inventory of Kalakeri microwatershed was conducted using village cadastral maps and IRS satellite imagery on 1:7920 scale. The false colour composites of IRS imagery were interpreted for physiography and these physiographic delineations were used as base for mapping soils. The soils were studied in several transects and a soil map was prepared with phases of soil series as mapping units. Random checks were made all over the area outside the transects to confirm and validate the soil map unit boundaries. The soil map shows the geographic distribution and extent, characteristics, classification, behavior and use potentials of the soils in the microwatershed. The present study covers an area of 497 ha in Koppal taluk and district, Karnataka. The climate is semiarid and categorized as drought - prone with an average annual rainfall of 662 mm, of which about 424 mm is received during south–west monsoon, 161 mm during north-east and the remaining 77 mm during the rest of the year. An area of 99 per cent is covered by soils, 150 cm). About 2 per cent area in the microwatershed has sandy soils, 65 per cent area in the microwatershed has loamy soils and 31 per cent clayey soils at the surface. About 80 per cent area has non-gravelly (200 mm/m) in available water capacity. About 4 per cent area of the microwatershed has nearly level (0-1% slope) lands and 95 per cent area of the microwatershed has very gently sloping (1-3% slope) lands. An area of about 53 per cent area is moderately (e2) eroded and about 46 per cent area is slightly (e1) eroded. An area of about 10 per cent soils are moderately acid to slightly acid (pH 5.5-6.5), 12 per cent soils are neutral (pH 6.5-7.3), 68 per cent soil are slightly alkaline to strongly alkaline (pH 7.3-9.0) and 8 per cent soils are very strongly alkaline (pH >9.0) in soil reaction. The Electrical Conductivity (EC) of the soils in the entire cultivated area of the microwatershed is dominantly 0.75%) in 59 per cent area. An area of about 52 per cent is medium (23-57 kg/ha) and 47 per cent is high (>57 kg/ha) in available phosphorus. An area of about 34 per cent is low (337 kg/ha) in available potassium. Available sulphur is low (20 ppm) in 24 per cent area of the microwatershed. An area of 66 per cent is low (4.5 ppm) and 58 per cent is deficient (1.0 ppm) in available manganese content. Entire cultivated area of the microwatershed is sufficient (>0.2 ppm) in available copper content. An area of about 24 per cent is deficient (0.6 ppm) in available zinc content. The land suitability for 31 major crops grown in the microwatershed was assessed and the areas that are highly suitable (S1) and moderately suitable (S2) are given below. It is however to be noted that a given soil may be suitable for various crops but what specific crop to be grown may be decided by the farmer looking to his capacity to invest on various inputs, marketing infrastructure, market price and finally the demand and supply position. Land suitability for various crops in the microwatershed Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Sorghum 58(12) 81(16) Sapota 56(11) 112(23) Maize 56(11) 99(20) Pomegranate 56(11) 170(34) Bajra 56(11) 186(37) Guava - 168(34) Groundnut - 380(77) Jackfruit 56(11) 112(23) Sunflower 58(12) 81(16) Jamun 56(11) 154(31) Cotton 58(12) 82(16) Musambi 58(12) 168(34) Red gram 56(11) 77(16) Lime 58(12) 168(34) Bengalgram 2(<1) 137(38) Cashew - 195(39) Chilli 56(11) 25(5) Custard apple 58(12) 417(84) Tomato 56(11) 25(5) Amla 56(11) 419(84) Brinjal 15(3) 389(78) Tamarind 56(11) 76(15) Onion 15(3) 330(66) Marigold 56(11) 84(17) Bhendi 15(3) 389(78) Chrysanthemum 56(11) 84(17) Drumstick 56(11) 294(59) Jasmine 56(11) 25(5) Mulberry 56(11) 419(84) Crossandra 56(11) 56(6) Mango 56(11) 75(13) Apart from the individual crop suitability, a proposed crop plan has been prepared for the 3 identified LMUs by considering only the highly and moderately suitable lands for different crops and cropping systems with food, fodder, fibre and other horticulture crops. Maintaining soil-health is vital for crop production and conserves soil and land resource base for maintaining ecological balance and to mitigate climate change. For this, several ameliorative measures have been suggested for these problematic soils like saline/alkali, highly eroded, sandy soils etc., Soil and water conservation treatment plan has been prepared that would help in identifying the sites to be treated and also the type of structures required. As part of the greening programme, several tree species have been suggested to be planted in marginal and submarginal lands, field bunds and also in the hillocks, mounds and ridges. That would help in supplementing the farm income, provide fodder and fuel, and generate lot of biomass which in turn would help in maintaining the ecological balance and contribute to mitigating the climate change. SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE SURVEY Results indicated that, 49 farmers were sampled in Kalakeri micro watershed among them 17 (34.69%) were marginal farmers, 19 (38.78 %) were small farmers, 6(12.24 %) were semi medium farmers, 2 (4.08 %) were medium farmers and 5 (10.20 %) landless farmers were also interviewed for the survey. The data indicated that there were 228 population households were there in the studied micro watershed. Among them 135 (59.21%) men and 93 (40.79 %) were women. The average family size of landless was 3, marginal farmers and medium farmers were 4, small farmer was 5 and semi medium farmer was 7. On an average the family size was 5. The data indicated that 35 (15.35%) people were in 0-15 years of age, 110 (48.25 %) were in 16-35 years of age, 58 (25.44 %) were in 36-60 years of age and 25 (10.96 %) were above 61 years of age. The results indicated that the Kalakeri had 35.53 per cent illiterates, 27.19 per cent of them had primary school education, 2.63 per cent of them had both middle school, 14.91 per cent them had high school education, 8.77 per cent of them had PUC education, 0.44 per cent them had Diploma education, 2.63 per cent of them had degree education, 1.75 per cent of them had masters education and 6.14 per cent them had others. The results indicated that, 89.79 per cent of households practicing agriculture, 2.04 per cent of the household heads were agricultural labour and 8.16 per cent of the household heads were general labour. The results indicated that agriculture was the major occupation for 52.63 per cent of the household members, 12.72 per cent were agricultural labourers, 5.70 per cent were general labours, 0.44 percent were in government service, 4.39 per cent of them were in private sector, 1.32 per cent of them were trade and business, 17.54 per cent of them were students, 4.82 per cent of them were children and 0.44 per cent were housewives. In case of landless households 76.47 per cent were general labourers and 11.76 per cent were students. In case of marginal farmers 59.70 per cent were agriculturist, 8.96 percent was in agricultural labour, 2.99 per cent of both were in private and trade and business and 20.90 per cent were students. In case of small farmers 58.06 per cent of them were agriculturist and 15.05 per cent of them were students. In case of semi medium farmers 48.84 per cent of the family members were agriculturist and 23.26 per cent of them were students. In case of medium farmers 62.50 per cent of the family members were agriculturist and 25 per cent of them were in private service. The results showed that 0.88 per cent of them participated in self help groups and 99.12 per cent of them have not participated in any local institutions. Small, semi medium and medium farmers were found to have no participation in any local 2 institutions. Land less and marginal farmers were found to participate in one or the other local institutions. The results indicated that 65.31 per cent of the households possess Katcha house, 2.04 per cent of the households possess Pucca house, 30.61 per cent of the households possess Semi Pacca house and 2.04 per cent of them possess Thatched house. 100 percent of the landless and medium farmers possess Katcha house. The results showed that, 2.04 per cent of the households possess radio, 83.67 per cent of the households possess TV, 53.06 per cent of the households possess Mixer grinder, 2.04 per cent of the households possess refrigerator, 32.65 per cent of the households possess bicycle, 30.61 per cent of the households possess motor cycle, 2.04 per cent of the households possess Auto, 89.80 per cent of the households possess mobile phones and 4.08 per cent of the households possess computer/laptop. The results showed that the average value of radio was Rs.800, television was Rs. 5024, mixer grinder was Rs.1892, refrigerator was Rs.15000, bicycle was Rs.7437, motor cycle was Rs.42866, Auto was Rs. 100000, mobile phone was Rs.1723 and computer/laptop was Rs. 2000. Results showed that 12.24 per cent of the households possess bullock cart, 20.41 per cent of them possess plough, 6.12 per cent of the households possess seed/fertilizer drill, 10.20 per cent of the households possess irrigation pump, 4.08 per cent of the households possess tractor, 16.33 per cent of the households possess sprayer, 2.04 per cent of the households possess sprinkler, 67.35 per cent of the households possess weeder, 12.24 per cent of the households possess harvester, 4.08 per cent of the households possess chaff cutter and 2.04 per cent of the households possess JCB/Hitachi. The results showed that the average value of bullock cart was Rs.20833; the average value of plough was Rs. 1040, the average value of seed/fertilizer drill was Rs. 1925, the average value of irrigation pump was Rs. 20750, the average value of tractor was Rs. 301500, the average value of sprayer was Rs. 4825, the average value of sprinkler was Rs. 500, the average value of weeder was Rs. 73, the average value of harvester was Rs. 80, the average value of chaff cutter was Rs. 3000 and the average value of JCB/Hitachi was Rs. 300000. The results indicated that, 28.57 per cent of the households possess bullocks, 20.41 per cent of the households possess local cow, 6.12 per cent of the households possess buffalo, 2.04 per cent of the households possess sheep and 4.08 per cent of the households possess poultry birds respectively. In case of marginal farmers, 17.65 per cent of the households possess bullock and local cow respectively and 5.88 per cent of the households possess poultry birds. In case of small farmers, 42.11 per cent of households possess bullock, 21.05 per cent possess local cow, 10.53 per cent of the households possess buffalo and 5.26 per cent possess sheep and poultry birds respectively. In case of semi medium farmers, 50 per 3 cent of the households possess both bullock and local cow correspondingly, 16.67 per cent of the households possess buffalo. The results indicated that, average own labour men available in the micro watershed was 1.56, average own labour (women) available was 1.33, average hired labour (men) available was 22.16 and average hired labour (women) available was 21.63. In case of marginal farmers, average own labour men available was 1.18, average own labour (women) was also 1.18, average hired labour (men) was 11.65 and average hired labour (women) available was 11.18. In case of small farmers, average own labour men available was 1.72, average own labour (women) was 1.28, average hired labour (men) was 30.28 and average hired labour (women) available was 30.28. In case of semi medium farmers, average own labour men available was 2, average own labour (women) was 2, average hired labour (men) was 25 and average hired labour (women) available was 21.67. In medium farmers average own labour men available was 2, average own labour (women) was 1, average hired labour (men) was 30 and average hired labour (women) available was 32.50. The results indicated that, 85.71 per cent of the household opined that hired labour was adequate which includes 94.12 per cent of the marginal farmers, 94.74 per cent of small, 100 per cent of semi medium and medium farmers and 2.04 per cent of the household opined that hired labour was inadequate. The results indicated that, households of the Kalakeri micro watershed possess 28.05 ha (62.87 %) of dry land and 16.57 ha (37.13 %) of irrigated land. Marginal farmers possess 10.26 ha (98.07 %) of dry land and 0.20 ha (1.93%) of irrigated land. Small farmers possess 15.25 ha (70.99 %) of dry land and 6.23 ha (29.01 %) of irrigated land. Semi medium farmers possess 2.54 ha (29.46 %) of dry land and 6.09 ha (70.54 %) of irrigated land. Medium farmers possess 4.05 ha (100%) of irrigated land. The results indicated that, the average value of dry land was Rs. 495354.20 and average value of irrigated was Rs. 633488.03. In case of marginal famers, the average land value was Rs. 682051.27 for dry land and Rs. 1482000 for irrigated land. In case of small famers, the average land value was Rs. 419532.91 for dry land Rs. 737792.21 for irrigated land. In case of semi medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 196656.04 for dry land and Rs. 706183.51 for irrigated land. In case of medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 321100 for irrigated land. The results indicated that, there were 7 functioning bore wells in the micro watershed. The results indicated that, bore well was the major irrigation source for 39.13 per cent of the farmers. The results indicated that on an average the depth of the bore well was 39.76 meters. The results indicated that, in case of marginal farmers there was 0. 20 ha of irrigated land, in case of small farmers there was 9.06 ha of irrigated land, semi medium farmers were having 8.05 ha of irrigated land and medium farmers were having 8.10 ha of irrigated land. On an average there were 25.41 ha of irrigated land. 4 The results indicated that, farmers have grown bajra (12.09 ha), maize (83.02 ha), paddy (1.82 ha) and sesamum (0.81ha) in kharif season. Also grown chilly (1.21 ha), cow pea (2.24 ha), groundnut (3.63 ha), paddy (0.40 ha), sunflower (3.04ha) and tomato (0.08 ha) in Rabi season. Marginal farmers have grown Maize, Bajra, sesamum, cowpea and groundnut. Small farmers have grown bajra, maize, paddy, cowpea, groundnut and tomato. Semi medium farmers have grown Maize, bajra, chilly, cowpea, groundnut and sunflower. Medium farmers have grown bajra, maize and sunflower. The results indicated that, the cropping intensity in Kalakeri micro watershed was found to be 177.17 per cent. In case of marginal farmers it was 527.38 per cent, in small farmers it was 92.17, in semi medium farmers it was 79.59 and in medium farmers it was 100 per cent. The results indicated that, 41.30 per cent of the households have bank account and savings respectively. Among marginal farmers 58.82 percent of them possess both bank account and savings. 36.84 per cent of small farmers possess both bank account and savings correspondingly. Semi medium farmers possess 16.67 per cent of both bank account and savings respectively and medium category of farmers possess 50 per cent of bank account and also savings correspondingly. The results indicated that, 58.82 per cent of marginal, 31.58 per cent of small and 50 per cent of medium farmers have borrowed credit from different sources. The results indicated that, 11.76 per cent have availed loan in commercial bank and friends/ relatives correspondingly, 52.94 per cent have availed loan from Grameena bank, 23.52 per cent have availed loan from money lender and 29.41 per cent have availed loan from SHGs/CBOs. The results indicated that, marginal, small and medium have availed Rs.37500, Rs. 90166.67 and Rs. 200000 respectively. Overall average credit amount availed by households in the micro watershed is 62000. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households have borrowed loan for agriculture production. The results indicated that, agriculture production, purchase–agricultural implements/ farm machinery, purchase-vehicle, household consumption and social functions like marriage reasons were the purpose for which marginal and small farmers borrowed loan from private credit. About 54.55 percent of loan was taken for agriculture production, 9.09 per cent of the loan was taken for purchase–agricultural implements/ farm machinery, purchase-vehicle, household consumption respectively and 18.18 per cent of the farmers taken loan for social functions like marriage. Results indicated that 9.09 per cent of the households have repaid their institutional credit partially and 90.91 percent of the households have unpaid their loan. 5 Results indicated that 27.27 per cent of the households have repaid their private credit partially, 54.55 percent of the households have unpaid their loan and 18.18 per cent of them fully paid their loan. The results indicated that 9.09 per cent of the households were opined that they were helped to perform timely agricultural operations, higher rate of interest and forced to sell the produce at low price to repay loan in time respectively. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for bajra was Rs. 32955.96. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 29877.63. The net income from bajra cultivation was Rs. -3078.33, thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.91. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for maize was Rs. 48488.33. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 94802.50. The net income from maize cultivation was Rs. 46314.17. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.96. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for paddy was Rs. 42321.23. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 60771.15. The net income from paddy cultivation was Rs. 18449.91. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.44. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Sesamum was Rs. 11003.14. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 20748.00. The net income from Sesamum cultivation was Rs. 9744.86. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.89. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Chilly was Rs. 18128.02. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 75746.67. The net income from Chilly cultivation was Rs. 57618.64. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:4.18. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Cowpea was Rs. 32618.68. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 16444.98. The net income from Cowpea cultivation was Rs. -16173.70. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.5. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for groundnut was Rs. 75670.65. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 82435.19. The net income from groundnut cultivation was Rs. 6764.53. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.09. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Sunflower was Rs. 21608.43. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 19142.50. The net income from Sunflower cultivation was Rs. -2465.93. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:0.89. The results indicated that, the total cost of cultivation for Tomato was Rs. 148312.50. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 493999.99. The net income from Tomato cultivation was Rs. 345687.50. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:3.33. The results indicated that, 32.65 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder was adequate and 2.04 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder was inadequate. 6 Similarly 28.57 per cent of the households opined that green fodder was adequate and 2.04 per cent of the households opined that green fodder was inadequate. The results indicated that the average income from service/salary was Rs. 3,918.37, business Rs. 1,530.61, wage Rs. 38,653.06, agriculture Rs. 61,736.73, dairy farm Rs. 612.24 and goat framing Rs. 1,020.41. The results indicated that the average expenditure from service/salary was Rs. 816.33, business Rs. 979.59, wage Rs. 8,326.53, agriculture Rs. 33,040.82, dairy farm Rs. 204.08 and goat farming Rs. 510.20. The results indicated that, sampled households have grown 105 coconut trees and 21 mango tree in their field. The results indicated that, households have planted 1 Eucalyptus tree, 4 teak trees, 97 neem trees, 16 tamarind tress and 4 banyan trees in their field and also grown 2 Neem tree in the backyard. The results indicated that for 2.04 per cent of the households were dependent on government subsidy for land development, irrigation facility and improved crop production respectively. The results indicated that, Bajra, Chilly, Cowpea, Paddy, Sesamum and Tomato crops were sold to the extent of 100 per cent. Groundnut, maize and sunflower were sold to the extent of 56.32 per cent, 75.89 per cent and 75 per cent respectively. The results indicated that, 75.51 percent of the households have sold their produce to agent/traders, 18.37 percent of the households have sold their produce to local/village merchant and 26.53 percent of the households sold their produce in regulated markets. The results indicated that 24.49 per cent of the households have used head load as a mode of transport, 32.65 per cent of them have used cart and 63.27 per cent have used tractor. The results indicated that, 36.73 per cent of the households have shown interest in soil testing. The results indicated that, 14.29 per cent of the households have adopted field bunding which includes 23.53 per cent of marginal, 10.53 per cent of small farmers and 16.67 per cent of semi medium farmers. The results indicated that, 100 per cent of the households who adopted field bunding opined that full replacement is required for the bunds. The results indicated that 10.20 per cent of soil conservation structure is constructed by the government and 4.08 per cent is constructed by others. The results indicated that, 71.43 percent used fire wood as a source of fuel, 24.49 percent of the households used LPG and 4.08 per cent of the households used dung cake as a source of fuel. The results indicated that, piped supply was the source of drinking water for 51.02 per cent, 36.73 per cent of them were using bore well and 10.20 per cents of the households were using lake/tank for drinking water. 7 The results indicated that, electricity was the major source of light for 100 per cent of the households. The results indicated that, 48.98 per cent of the households possess sanitary toilet i.e. 20 per cent of landless, 47.06 per cent of marginal, 42.11 per cent of small, 100 per cent of semi medium and 50 per cent of medium had sanitary toilet facility. The results indicated that, 95.92 per cent of the sampled households possessed BPL card and 4.08 per cent of the sampled households have not possessed BPL card. The results indicated that, 32.65 per cent of the households participated in NREGA programme which included 60 per cent of the landless, 17.65 percent of the marginal, 15.79 per cent of the small, 100 per cent of the semi medium and 50 percent of the medium farmers. The results indicated that, cereals, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits , milk, egg and meat were adequate for 100 per cent, 83.67 per cent, 57.14 per cent, 69.39 per cent, 20.41 per cent, 91.84 per cent, 81.63 per cent and 63.27 per cent respectively. The results indicated that, vegetables, fruits and meat were inadequate for 26.53 per cent of the households. Pulses, oilseed, milk and egg were inadequate for 16.33 per cent, 42.86 per cent, 6.12 per cent and 10.20 per cent of the households. The results indicated that, Lower fertility status of the soil was the constraint experienced by 38.78 per cent of the households, wild animal menace on farm field (67.35%), frequent incidence of pest and diseases (57.14%), inadequacy of irrigation water (30.61%), high cost of Fertilizers and plant protection chemicals (44.90%), high rate of interest on credit (53.06%), low price for the agricultural commodities (34.69%), lack of marketing facilities in the area (46.94%), inadequate extension services (26.53%), lack of transport for safe transport of the agricultural produce to the market (38.78%), less rain fall (48.98%) and Source of Agri-technology information(Newspaper/TV/Mobile) (18.37 %). ; Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (World Bank Funded) Sujala –III Project
