Suchergebnisse

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-4

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-5

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-6

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-7

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-8

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-9

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 372 m-10

European economic integration has gathered new momentum since Member States of the European Community (EC) signed the Single European Act in February 1986 aimed at creating a region with no internal frontiers and with free movement of goods and services, capital, labour and the professions by the end of the year 1992. Since then, numerous decisions have been made by EC heads of governments , the EC Council of Members, the EC Commission, the European Parliament and the twelve national parliaments in order to achieve this ambitious goal. As third world countries are increasingly becoming more aware of the emerging internal EC market, they are increasingly concerned about the implications and repercussions of this single European market on their future econoic relations with the EC and the impact on their national economies

The disparate banana import policies currently operating in member states of the EC are inconsistent with the Community's objective of full economic integration in 1992. Preferential trade agreements confer sizable subsidies on some African and Caribbean banana producers and disadvantage other exporting countries, mainly in Latin America. Adoption of a "common" banana regime in the Community in 1992 could potentially alter the pattern of world trade. The purpose of this study is to assess the main economic effects of existing policies and of various policy alternatives

The basis for the national report is the request in article 11 of the Eurovignette directive (Directive 1999/62/EC as amended by Dir. 2006/38/EC). "No later than 10 June 2011, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation and effects of this Directive, taking account of developments in technology and the trend in traffic density, including the use of vehicles of more than 3,5 and less than 12 tonnes, and evaluating its impact on the internal market, including on island, landlocked and peripheral regions of the Community, levels of investment in the sector and its contribution to the objectives of a sustainable transport policy. Member States shall forward the necessary information for the report to the Commission no later than 10 December 2010." In the country report for Sweden the question catalogue developed by the Commission has been followed.

Real estate prices in Brussels started to increase at a very rapid rate in 1987-1988. This happened a few years before the European Community had to decide whether the Commission would remain in Brussels, and whether the European Parliament would be moved to Brussels. The main purpose of the paper is to analyze whether the European Community influenced real estate rents in Brussels during tghe period 1980-1992, and whether this influence has increased over time. We find evidence of a significant rent increase due to the EC after 1988. ; info:eu-repo/semantics/published