Suchergebnisse

"This book analyses the relationship between history education and nationalism in the context of the dominant structures of collective memory in Poland. Drawing on original qualitative research with history teachers, it explores the ways in which teachers understand the aims of history teaching and how they teach history, with some contesting or negotiating official and hegemonic nationalist memory projects, while others predominantly reproduce or radicalise them. A study of teachers' tendencies to approach history through the prism of nationalism, this study reveals a view of history lessons as a means of instilling national identity in students, as the past is constructed in nationalist terms and no contradiction is identified in viewing history as both an objective science and a 'nationalising' tool. An examination of the means by which a dominant nationalist discourse is reinforced through historical education, Teaching History, Celebrating Nationalism will appeal to scholars of sociology and education with interests in nationalism and memory studies"--

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Albert Jay Nock: Pessimism about Education by State or Market -- Chapter 3: Frank Chodorov: Consumer Sovereignty, Markets in Education, and "A School on Every Corner" -- Chapter 4: Ayn Rand: Isabel Paterson, Private Education for a Free Society, and Education for Galt's Gulch -- Chapter 5: Murray Rothbard: Separating Education and the State Beyond Left and Right -- Chapter 6: Milton (and Rose) Friedman: Education Vouchers and State Financing of Private Education -- Chapter 7: Myron Lieberman: Education without Romance, Public Choice Economics, and Markets in Education -- Chapter 8: "Other Conceptions, Both Powerful and Exotic": School Choice Visions from Voices from the Political Left -- Chapter 9: Conclusion

History of education in North Carolina ; Typed copy of excerpt from the Government Printing Office.

This text looks at the developments in the relationship between history education and civic education in the Bulgarian educational tradition in the 1878-1944 period and tends to finally refer to the present state of affairs. It examines the political contexts of the methods and writing of textbooks which have ensured the political longevity of the conservative nationalist model in the worldview of both school subjects. The observations are based upon more than eighty textbooks on history and civic education published since 1878 (of which only those that are typical and representative of the dominant trends in the Bulgarian educational tradition are cited here) as well as upon some works in didactics. The main features in the texture of the conservative model are identified on the basis of a discourse analysis of history and civic education textbooks, and they concern the disciplinary, spatio-temporal, and conceptual homologies found in them.

Публікація висвітлює результати дослідження проблеми навчання історії розумово відсталих школярів у 30-40-х роках минулого століття ; У статті висвітлено проблему вивчення історичного матеріалу розумово відсталими дітьми в радянській Україні у 30-х – 40-х роках ХХ століття, розглянуто питання становлення шкільного курсу «Історія СРСР» як самостійного навчального предмету у допоміжних навчальних закладах у 30-х – 40-х роках минулого століття. Проаналізовано роботи видатних радянських вчених-дефектологів щодо проблеми викладання історії у допоміжній школі, а саме розроблені ними вимоги до підручників для розумово відсталих школярів та необхідність застосування пропедевтичних заходів перед вивченням історії учнями з розумовою відсталістю. Вивчено погляди науковців щодо методики викладання історії учням допоміжної школи, досліджено змістовий компонент шкільного курсу «Історія СРСР» 30-х – 40-х років ХХ століття та встановлено, що у цей період учням, переважно, викладалася історія про боротьбу народних мас за краще життя, про революційні події 1905 та 1917 років, про життя та політичну діяльність лідерів ВКП(б) В. І. Леніна, Й. В. Сталіна тощо. Проаналізовано вимоги до знань, умінь і навичок з історії для учнів 6-7-х класів допоміжної школи за програмою 1938 року видання та програмові вимоги з історії для 5-7-х класів допоміжної школи від 1940 року. Відмічено надмірну заполітизованість цієї шкільної дисципліни, визначено кількість годин відведених на вивчення навчальних предметів «Історія СРСР» та «Конституція СРСР» у 30-х – 40-х роках минулого століття. Встановлено тісний взаємозв'язок між ідеологією радянської влади та змістом курсу історії, як у допоміжній школі, так і у масових навчальних закладах, визначено великі сподівання тогочасних партійних можновладців на виховні можливості курсу історії, а саме у таких аспектах, як суспільна й політична активність, атеїзм, патріотизм, інтернаціоналізм тощо. ; The article deals with the problem of studying historical material mentally retarded children in Soviet Ukraine within the 30-s – 40-s of the twentieth century. The article deals with the problem of a school course «History of the USSR» as a separate school subject in special schools in the 30-s – 40-s the last century. The analysis scientific work of prominent Soviet scientists defectologists the problem of history teaching in special school, elaborate out their requirements for textbooks for mentally retarded children and the need for propedeutics to study history children with mental retardation. investigated the views of scientists on methods of teaching history to children at a special school, investigated content component school course «History of the USSR» 30-s – 40-s of the twentieth century and found that during this period the children are mostly taught the masses struggle for a better life, revolutionary events of 1905 and 1917 the last, life and politics leaders of the VKP(b) of V. I. Lenin, I. V. Stalin and others. Analyzed the requirements for knowledge and skills in history for mentally retarded children 6-7 for a program special school in 1938 edition and program requirements in History for 5-7 grade special school from 1940, noted the excessive politicization of school discipline, defined number of hours allotted on the study subjects «History of the Soviet Union» and «Constitution of the USSR» in the 30-s – 40-s of last century. Establish a close relationship between the ideology of Soviet power and content of the course of history, both in special school and in mass school, set high expectations of the then party in power at the educational opportunities the course of history, namely in such aspects of education as a social and political activity, atheism, patriotism, internationalism and more.

Hidden and unhidden normativity in Social science education and History education are being intensively researched and criticized in both educational scientific and media discourses (Gatto 2002). In addition, they are extensively discussed in teacher education and concealed or explicated in education policies and curricula for these school subjects. These discussions are further, to more or less extent, related to civic and citizenship education, as well as to political discourses more generally (e.g. Papastephanou, 2007; Hedtke, Zimenkova & Hippe, 2008 in previous issues of JSSE). Not only do political actors at macro level try to provide for citizen formation with help of Social science education and History education . A multitude of other actors at regional and local level – be it non-governmental, religious or economic actors, or parents – bring their own agendas and normative stances into the school subjects of Social science education and History Education. The term "hidden curricula" and the idea of (hidden) normativity are further associated with national and supra national policy agendas and grand cultural narratives. However, local and regional specifics that are intimately connected to the normatively laden conceptions of citizenship education and learning inside and outside of school, we argue, can and should be provided increased attention in research. In this special issue, two school subjects are highlighted: Social science education and History education. The very idea of normativity of Social science education and History education is being evaluated quite differently in different national educational settings and subject didactic traditions. It encompasses the whole range from being considered as allowable and wishful in order to reach some central moral, political or other normative goals of society to absolute ban and resolute absence of any substantive or normative qualification of social science and history teachers as professionals (for the German discussion, cf. Besand et al., 2011). This special issue of the JSSE, entitled (Hidden) Normativity in Social Science Education and History Education brings together empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions that in one way or the other elaborate on normativity in Social science education and History education. Central questions addressed in the call are: How is normativity visible and formed within Social science education and History education? How can these processes be approached empirically? Is there something wrong with normativity, and if so why? Which role does normativity play for social science teachers and history teachers in their profession? The authors in this issue have created vital responses to these questions, suggesting new comparative methodologies and opening up innovative areas of empirical research in more or less theoretical framings. The following specific approaches to research on normativity in Social science education and History education are embraced by the authors: - Normativity is stressed as a phenomenon indisputably related to Social science education and History education. But the modes of normativity, its explicitness, direction, strength and actors alter. Education policy and practice are deeply entwined, and processes of normative change come to the fore in critical and constructive investigations of central concepts in these school subjects, at different school levels and over time. Out of different theoretical and methodological approaches, the authors demonstrate convincingly the necessity to consider different sources of empirical material in order not only to map and describe different facets of normativity in Social science education and History education. But also to make a case for the complexity involved in the intermingling of hidden and unhidden normativity in the everyday practice of teaching and learning of these school subjects. - Focusing different forms of knowledge and conceptual uses in policy and practice in Social science education and History education (at mainly upper secondary level) allow for approaching normativity not only as a matter of detecting where it is situated in these school subjects and why this is so. It also contributes to the development of relevant subject specific methodological frameworks that may be considered key for the development of this field of research. - Sociological and other educational theories and methods deriving from social sciences are being use innovatively by the authors. In doing so, we argue, they open up for a widening of the scope as regards the meaning and importance of theoretically underpinned comparative approaches to the research field of subject didactics. - By stressing critical concepts and conceptual uses in Social science education and History education, the intimate connection between these subjects and their assigned task to see to citizenship learning and social formation emerges. ; Guest Editors' introductory text to the theme issue (Hidden) Normativity in Social Science Education and History Education.

Contents: A general survey--Our English system--The great foundations--The legislative growth of English education--Appendix--Chronological table. ; Mode of access: Internet.

This book explores how the expectations of historical justice movements and processes are understood within educational contexts, particularly history education. In recent years, movements for historical justice have gained global momentum and prominence as the focus on righting wrongs from the past has become a feature of contemporary politics. This imperative has manifested in globally diverse contexts including societies emerging from recent, violent conflict, but also established democracies which are increasingly compelled to address the legacies of colonialism, slavery, genocides, and war crimes, as well as other forms of protracted discord. This book examines historical justice from an educational perspective, exploring the myriad ways that education is understood as a site of historical injustice, as well as a mechanism for redress. The editors and contributors analyse the role of history education in processes of historical justice broadly, exploring educational sites, policies, media, and materials. This edited collection is a unique and important touchstone volume for scholars, policy-makers, practitioners, and teachers that can guide future research, policy, and practice in the fields of historical justice, human rights and history education.

Colonial missionaries and their schools -- Treaties and western removal, 1776-1867 -- Reservations, 1867-1887 -- Allotment and dependency, 1887-1923 -- Mission schools -- Government boarding schools -- Students and families -- A new deal, 1923-1945 -- Termination and relocation, 1945-1969 -- Self-determination, 1969-1990 -- Higher education -- Language and culture revitalization, 1990-2017