Response
In: Nationalities papers: the journal of nationalism and ethnicity, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 331-333
ISSN: 0090-5992
A rejoinder to comments by Istvan Deak, John R. Lampe, & Gale Stokes (all, 1999) on Charles Ingrao's "Understanding Ethnic Conflict in Central Europe: An Historical Perspective" (1999) that admits to a certain nostalgia for the multiethnic society that existed for centuries across Central Europe before the 20th century. Although both the Ottoman & Hapsburg empires failed to bring this multiethnic tradition forward into the 20th century, primarily because they bestowed benefits on corporate groups rather than individuals, the Hapsburgs were more committed to a democratic alternative to the nation-state than the Ottomans. Although the commentators suggest that a post-nation-state alternative to the present conflicts is idealistic, they implicitly agree that the nation-state has been a primary culprit in the region's troubles. The challenge has become the creation of a vibrant civil society in a wholly uncivil region of the world. It is this challenge to which Western leaders & scholars ought to be committed. D. Ryfe