Suchergebnisse

Conflict is an event that often the pros and cons and both causalities and material causalities. Indonesia is a country that has diverse culture, religious, and political perspective as well as a variety of social status that can cause a variety of views among the community. Internet today has become one of the means to provide information to the public. Coverage of all events happening in the world today would be very easy to access via the internet with up to date from time to time. Topics of conflict will be a very interesting issue for everyone in any country it belongs, where one of them is the country of Indonesia. Some media have their own opinions in response to the impact of the conflict between North Korea and South Korea.Some experts argue that the conflict has a positive function and negative one. However, the mindset of conflict theory opposites with structural functional theory. Functional Theory and structural theory, both equally likely to focus on their own variables and ignore variables of concern to other theories. In an effort to reconcile these two theories, the conflict can contribute to the integration and reverse integration can also result in conflict (Bolter and Grusin, 2000). .This research uses discourse analysis to answer the problem. Its typically, the expansion of the meaning of the term is associated with a broader context which affects the meaning of the term is associated with a broader context which affects the meaning of a whole series of expressions.Internet gives impacts to the conflict between North – South Korean. They give an up to date information as long as the conflict has attended. The conflict news from internet can be able to access faster than other medias. It will influence the stabilization and continuing of its conflict. Internet has big playing role in communication politics among both country North and South Korean.

Explores both sides of issues related to Korea and its relationship with the United States, including the military threat from North Korea, human rights violations, and the likelihood of reunification

Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction: My Democratization Studies in Retrospect -- References -- Part I: Authoritarianism and Democratic Transition -- Chapter 2: The Rise of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in South Korea -- Toward an Analytical Framework for Industrialization and Regime Change -- The Bureaucratic Authoritarian Model and Its Critics -- An Alternative Analytical Framework -- How, Then, Are Changes in the Economic System Related to Regime Change? -- Authoritarian Transition in Dependent Capitalism -- Transition to Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in Korea -- The Organization of the Economy (1961-1972) -- Changes in the Configuration of Classes of International Capital -- Local Bourgeoisie -- Peasants -- Working Class and Social Marginals -- The State and Classes -- The Restricted Democracy (1963-1971) -- Crisis in the Restricted Democracy -- Organic Crisis -- The Institutional Crisis of 1971 -- Conclusion -- Chapter 3: Recasting Park Chung Hee's Authoritarianism: Myths, Reality and Legacies -- The Legacy of Park Chung Hee-Still Alive and Well -- Types of Modern Authoritarianism: Bureaucratic Authoritarianism, Neo-Patrimonialism, Developmental Soft Authoritarianism, Bureaucratic Feudalism -- The Myth of Park Chung Hee's Developmental Authoritarianism 1: How Developmental Was Park Chung Hee's Authoritarianism? -- Park Chung Hee's Authoritarianism in the 1960s (the Third Republic) -- Park Chung Hee's Authoritarianism in the 1970s (the Yushin Regime) -- The Myths in Park Chung Hee's Developmental Authoritarianism 2: Endogenous and Exogenous Factors in Development in the Park Chung Hee Period -- Theory of Endogenous Growth: Strategic Choice of Park Chung Hee -- The Theory of Exogenous Growth: Colonial Legacies, Benevolent American Hegemony, Land Reform and Confucian Capitalism.

Bringing together outstanding researchers, this book is the first to examine the theory and practice of policy analysis in South Korea. Drawing on case studies, it explores the development of policy analysis and procedures for decision making at different levels of government.

This study analyzes the political viability of the Russia-North Korea-South Korea (RNS) gas pipeline project. This analysis demonstrates that North Korea&rsquo ; s fourth nuclear test in January 2016 changed the dynamic of the project. Before the test, when inter-Korean relations were good, South Korea and Russia could make efforts to secure political support for the project. However, after the fourth nuclear test, this was no longer the case. As North Korea&rsquo ; s nuclear power status became more evident, this nuclear problem began to have profound implications for U.S. security. In response, Washington not only led the UN Security Council to impose very severe sanctions against North Korea, but also placed its own sanctions on the country. These sanctions began to contain provisions that could prevent the implementation of the pipeline project. In addition to these sanctions, the U.S. sanctions against Russia in 2017 over its intervention in the U.S. election and aggression against Ukraine also contained clauses that could hamper it. Therefore, unless the U.S. lifts or eases all of these sanctions, South Korea and Russia are unwilling to take any concrete actions to secure political support for the RNS pipeline project. Based on this analysis, this paper argues that the U.S. now holds the most important key to its political viability.