Men in Political Theory
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 350-351
ISSN: 1476-9336
136167 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 350-351
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 350-351
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 92-115
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 92-115
ISSN: 0090-5917
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 398-413
ISSN: 1552-7476
In: Philosophy & public affairs, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 115
ISSN: 0048-3915
In: British journal of political science, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 379
ISSN: 0007-1234
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 396-408
ISSN: 0090-5917
SSRN
Working paper
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 480-487
ISSN: 1741-2730
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 480-487
ISSN: 1474-8851
The new edition of this accessible and thought-provoking title has been updated to incorporate the most recent developments in feminism and feminist scholarship, particularly the impact of black and post-modern feminist thought on feminist political theory.
""Men in Political Theory"" builds on feminist re-readings of the traditional canon of male writers in political philosophy by turning the ""gender lens"" on to the representation of men in widely studied texts. It explains the distinction between ""man"" as an apparently de-gendered ""individual"" or ""citizen"" and ""man"" as an overtly gendered being in human society. The ten chapters on Plato, Aristotle, Jesus, Augustine, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Marx and Engels show the operation of the ""gender lens"" in different ways, depending on how each philosopher deploys concepts of m
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 465-486
ISSN: 1541-0986
Penn State's decision to eliminate political theory set off existential angst about the status of political theory in the discipline. The organized, defensive responses to that decision failed to answer the central question it posed: Is "political theory" social science, and if not, why does it belong? I argue that social scientific political theory is political science and its many strains—conceptual, normative, and explanatory—belong in the discipline on their own terms. Humanistic research, like dermatology or music theory, is not political science and as such it should find another home. By explaining why (and what kinds of) political theory is political science this article may wind up being offensive in both senses of the word. But it is meant to be in service to a more secure, stable, and productive interdisciplinary future for all kinds of political theory going forward.
Theorists interested in learning more about any given interpretive approach are often required to navigate a dizzying array of sources, with no clear sense of where to begin. The prose of many primary sources is often steeped in dense and technical argot that novices find intimidating or even impenetrable. Interpretation in Political Theory provide students of political theory a single introductory reference guide to major approaches to interpretation available in the field today. --