Suchergebnisse

The 43rd UID conference, held in Genova, takes up the theme of 'Dialogues' as practice and debate on many fundamental topics in our social life, especially in these complex and not yet resolved times. The city of Genova offers the opportunity to ponder on the value of comparison and on the possibilities for the community, naturally focused on the aspects that concern us, as professors, researchers, disseminators of knowledge, or on all the possibile meanings of the discipline of representation and its dialogue with 'others', which we have broadly catalogued in three macro areas: History, Semiotics, Science / Technology. Therefore, "dialogue" as a profitable exchange based on a common language, without which it is impossible to comprehend and understand one another; and the graphic sign that connotes the conference is the precise transcription of this concept: the title 'translated' into signs, derived from the visual alphabet designed for the visual identity of the UID since 2017. There are many topics which refer to three macro sessions: - Witnessing (signs and history) - Communicating (signs and semiotics) - Experimenting (signs and sciences) Thanks to the different points of view, an exceptional resource of our disciplinary area, we want to try to outline the prevailing theoretical-operational synergies, the collaborative lines of an instrumental nature, the recent updates of the repertoires of images that attest and nourish the relations among representation, history, semiotics, sciences.

This paper adopts as a starting hypothesis that the Italian Constitutiononly provides for constitutional, homogeneous or even occasional «revisions» (section 1). However, the author criticizes that political forces have intended to approve up to six times constitutional «reforms» that, as such, are not homogeneous. In particular, four of them failed to be approved, while two others, although approved by the Parliament, ended up being rejected after two referendums in 2006 and 2016 (section 2). Therefore, the analysis reveals that the original meaning of the concept of «revision» provided for in Article 138 of the Italian Constitution has remained firm (section 3). Finally, the author submits to scrutiny the so-called «Boschi reform» (section 4), which was addressed at the initiative of the leader of the Democratic Party, Matteo Renzi, and was finally rejected by popular referendum as well. Indeed, such reform posed serious perplexities, not only because of the violation of the direct election concerning the Senate, but also as a result of the contradictory nature of Senators statute, the excessive differentiation of legislative procedures and, finally, the violation of the constitutional principle recognizing the guarantee of self-government in favour of territorial entities.Summary:1. Constitutional «Revisions» and «Reforms». 2. The failed attempts of constitutional «reforms». 3. Article 138 of the Constitution still provides for «Revisions» and not «Reforms». 4. The Boschi «Reform» ; La hipótesis de partida del presente trabajo radica en que la Constitución italiana únicamente prevé «revisiones» constitucionales, homogéneas o incluso puntuales (apartado 1). No obstante, el autor critica que las fuerzas políticas han intentado aprobar hasta en seis ocasiones «reformas» constitucionales que, como tales, no son homogéneas. En concreto, cuatro de ellas no consiguieron ser aprobadas, mientras otras dos, aun siendo aprobadas por el Parlamento, acabaron siendo rechazadas tras sendos referéndums en 2006 y 2016 (apartado 2). Por lo tanto, el análisis revela que el significado original del concepto de «revisión» previsto en el artículo 138 de la Constitución italiana se ha mantenido firme (apartado 3). Finalmente, el autor somete a escrutinio la «reforma Boschi» (apartado 4), que fue abordada a iniciativa del líder del Partido Democrático, Matteo Renzi, siendo asimismo rechazada en sede popular. En efecto, dicha reforma planteaba serias perplejidades, tanto por la violación de la elección directa del Senado, como por la naturaleza contradictoria de la disciplina de los Senadores, por la diferenciación excesiva de los procedimientos legislativos y, por último, por la violación del principio constitucional de la garantía de las autonomías territoriales.

At head of title: Atti parlamentari. Legislatura XXIV - sessione 1913-15. Camera dei deputati. N. XXXII (Documenti) ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: Atti parlamentari. Legislatura XXIII- sessione 1909-11. Camera dei deputati N. XLIV (Documenti) ; French, Italian and Spanish. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Volltext // Exemplar mit der Signatur: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek -- Ital. 174 mo