Suchergebnisse

Institutional choice and democratic survival in new democracies -- Weimar Germany : defective institutional choice -- Interwar Poland : institutional choice by imposition -- The Federal Republic of Germany : learning from history -- Postcommunist Poland : institutional choice as an extended process

As democracy has swept the globe, the question of why some democracies succeed while others fail has remained a pressing concern. In this theoretically innovative, richly historical study, Michael Bernhard looks at the process by which new democracies choose their political institutions, showing how these fundamental choices shape democracy's survival. Offering a new analytical framework that maps the process by which basic political institu-tions emerge, Bernhard investigates four paradigmatic episodes of democracy in two countries: Germany during the Weimar period and after World War II, a.

The concept of totalitarianism emerged between the two world wars in twentieth-century Europe to become a central concept of Cold War social science designed to highlight similarities between the Nazi and Soviet regimes and implicitly to contrast these forms of dictatorship with liberal democracy. While in the 1960s and 1970s many critics challenged the concept's Cold War uses as an ideology of "the West," the idea of totalitarianism and later "post-totalitarianism" played important roles in East Central Europe, where they helped dissident intellectuals, academics, and activists both to understand and to challenge Soviet-style communism. The concept of "totalitarianism" remains heavily contested. But whatever one thinks about the concept's social scientific validity, there can be no doubt that it played a crucial role in both the scholarship of communism and the public intellectual debates about the possibilities of post-communism. Aviezer Tucker's The Legacies of Totalitarianism: A Theoretical Framework (Cambridge 2015) addresses many of these issues, and so we have invited a range of political scientists to comment on the book and the broader theme denoted by its title.

Der Autor benennt und analysiert eine Reihe externer wie interner Faktoren, die er einer umfassenden und beschleunigten Transformation des politischen und wirtschaftlichen Systems in Polen (hin zu Parlamentarismus und Marktwirtschaft) entgegenstehen sieht. Dazu zählt er: 1. die Implikationen der Umstrukturierung des internationalen Systems bzw. der europäischen Ordnung; 2. ökonomische Faktoren (polnische Wirtschaftskrise); 3. nicht-ökonomische Behinderungen der Marktwirtschaft (Korruption etc.); 4. soziale bzw. sozialpsychologische Aspekte (Spaltung der Gesellschaft, Demoralisierung breiter Schichten); 5. problematische Hinterlassenschaften des alten Regimes (Nomenklatura etc.); sowie 6. die partei-bzw. gewerkschaftsinternen Probleme der regierenden Solidarnosc. (BIOst-Hml)

This issue marks the last of our six years as the editorial team of Perspectives on Politics. It has been both a richly rewarding and exhausting journey, as well as a labor of love. As with all journeys, some of what we encountered along the way was foreseeable, but much of it was not. For example, we knew that Donald Trump's presidency would be consequential and in many ways unprecedented when we assumed the helm in June 2017, but not that he would become the first president to be impeached twice, or the first to attempt to overturn presidential election results and violently prevent the peaceful transfer of power, thereby threatening the republic's very foundations. We had no idea what COVID-19 was, or that it would go on to kill more than one million people in the United States alone. Nor could we foresee that the murder of George Floyd would spark the greatest wave of protest in the United States since the 1960s. Nor yet again did we know that more than seventy-five years after the end of World War II, there would be a major European land war between two former Soviet Republics. Yet we felt compelled to respond to each of these world historical moments as they unfolded in real time, while also attempting to modernize and innovate with respect to the journal's publication procedures and to stay true to its substantive mission.

Each year we have the honor to publish an article version of the APSA Presidential Address. In the six years we have done this John Ishiyama is the first comparativist whose work we have featured in this capacity. He presently holds an appointment as University Distinguished Research Professor of Political Science at the University of North Texas. John has long been a fixture in the subfield of comparative politics for his contributions on democratization, political parties, and ethnic politics in both the post-Soviet region and Africa. He has also written extensively on teaching, publishing, and assessment in political science. He has published over 150 articles. And while the outlets and subject matter are too diverse to summarize succinctly, we do want to mention that "The Politics of Intercountry Adoption: Explaining Variation in the Legal Requirements of Sub-Saharan African Countries," coauthored with Marijke Breuning, won the 2010 APSA Heinz Eulau Award for Best Journal Article published in Perspectives on Politics during the previous year (2009).