Provocation and Appropriation: Hannah Arendt's Response to Martin Heidegger
In: Constellations: an international journal of critical and democratic theory, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 153-171
ISSN: 1351-0487
Argues that Hannah Arendt's understanding of politics, action, & plurality is a profound response to Martin Heidegger's failure to understand the meaning of public life. According to Arendt, the human condition is characterized by a capacity to act & speak, which, in turn, represent opportunities to bring into being something wholly new & unique. Thus, the human condition is, by definition, plural, with individuals acting, speaking, & creating new things. For Arendt, the most important danger of modern bureaucratic social life was the extinction of this plurality in speech & action. It is shown that Arendt comes to this conclusion not simply by borrowing Heidegger's concepts, but by appropriating & inverting them into a new meaning. It is concluded that, while, in a sense, Arendt was faithful to Heidegger in employing his concepts, she was unfaithful by engaging in independent thinking & thinking against him; she used his provocation to provide an acute critique of his work. D. M. Smith