High level advisory groups: The case of the priorities review staff
In: Politics: Australasian Political Studies Association journal, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 186-196
127 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Politics: Australasian Political Studies Association journal, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 186-196
In: BWB Texts
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 373-376
ISSN: 1468-0491
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 349-368
ISSN: 1460-3683
In democracies where no party enjoys a parliamentary majority, various multi-party governance arrangements have evolved to accommodate the respective interests of the parties involved. Such arrangements reflect, among other things, the political imperatives facing the parties in question, in particular the quest for an effective and durable government (which typically requires significant inter-party discipline) and the competing desire for parties to retain their distinctiveness in order to protect their electoral support (which implies less discipline). In New Zealand, efforts to balance governmental unity and party distinctiveness have generated several innovative solutions, including agree-to-disagree provisions in coalition agreements and hybrid arrangements enabling minor parties to participate within the executive while being free of the usual conventions of collective cabinet responsibility. This article explores the origins, nature, merits and impact of the recent developments in New Zealand, and their implications for the study of coalition government. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 349-369
ISSN: 1354-0688
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 349-368
ISSN: 1460-3683
In democracies where no party enjoys a parliamentary majority, various multi-party governance arrangements have evolved to accommodate the respective interests of the parties involved. Such arrangements reflect, among other things, the political imperatives facing the parties in question, in particular the quest for an effective and durable government (which typically requires significant inter-party discipline) and the competing desire for parties to retain their distinctiveness in order to protect their electoral support (which implies less discipline). In New Zealand, efforts to balance governmental unity and party distinctiveness have generated several innovative solutions, including agree-to-disagree provisions in coalition agreements and hybrid arrangements enabling minor parties to participate within the executive while being free of the usual conventions of collective cabinet responsibility. This article explores the origins, nature, merits and impact of the recent developments in New Zealand, and their implications for the study of coalition government.
In: Climate policy, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 3-16
ISSN: 1469-3062
World Affairs Online
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 623-642
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: Climate policy, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 3-16
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 623-643
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Routledge Studies in Accounting; Accounting in Politics, S. 109-133
In: Political science, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 21-43
ISSN: 2041-0611
In: Political science, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 21-44
ISSN: 0112-8760, 0032-3187