Economic Discontent as a Mobilizer: Unemployment and Voter Turnout
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 76, Heft 4, S. 887-898
ISSN: 0022-3816
137 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 76, Heft 4, S. 887-898
ISSN: 0022-3816
SSRN
Working paper
In: Electoral Studies, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 348
In: Electoral studies: an international journal on voting and electoral systems and strategy, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 1-7
ISSN: 1873-6890
In: Electoral Studies, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 1-7
This Special Symposium is devoted to understanding why, when, and how often voters in different regions of the world engage in split-ticket voting. Taken together, the essays in this volume consider a range of common mechanisms for ticket splitting -- strategic voting, policy balancing, necessary voting, and candidate-centered voting -- sometimes arriving at divergent conclusions from the existing literature and from each other. To provide a broader frame for these contributions, here we offer a general definition of ticket splitting, examine the state of existing theory, consider the various methodological challenges that ticket-splitting poses for analysts, and reflect on the broader substantuve implications of ticket-splitting for the quality and stability of democracy. [Copyright Elsevier Ltd.]
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 1-8
ISSN: 0261-3794
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 348-349
ISSN: 0261-3794
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 26, Heft 6, S. 869-886
ISSN: 1467-9221
Despite the centrality of party identification in understandings of political behavior in the United States, there is an unacknowledged disparity between our theories and measurement of the phenomenon. The traditional method of measuring party identification relies on supplying cognitive cues by explicitly asking respondents to "think" about their partisanship. The Michigan theory of party identification, in contrast, assumes that partisanship is primarily affective. Using a survey experiment, we explore the effects of asking respondents to feel rather than think about their party identification. The new questions reveal that the electorate is more Republican than previously thought. Response timers show that respondents take longer to answer the new items, suggesting that they are surveying a wider and deeper array of considerations. These results serve to revive many of our traditional conceptions of how party identity works while also opening the door for new research questions.
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 26, Heft 6, S. 869-886
ISSN: 0162-895X
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 67, Heft 4, S. 555-578
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 67, Heft 4, S. 555-578
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 63
ISSN: 1938-274X
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 63-76
ISSN: 1065-9129
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 63-76
ISSN: 1065-9129
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 237-250
ISSN: 1537-5331