Cosmopolitan Justice and Cultural Diversity
In: Global society: journal of interdisciplinary international relations, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 525-551
ISSN: 1360-0826
Cosmopolitan approaches to global justice & resource distribution have been subjected to criticism by those who argue that such approaches ignore the diversity of cultures & values in the world. This essay considers & rejects three of these arguments. (1) In the case of the "cultural relativism argument," if all truth & values are relative, then cosmopolitan approaches are not feasible, at best, & amount to little more than Western cultural imperialism, at worst. This argument ignores the fact that cosmopolitanism does not necessarily assume the presence of universal truth. Moreover, the relativist approach actually sanctions cosmopolitanism (at least by those who hold cosmopolitan values). (2) The "cultural respect" argument, which contends that one group should not try to impose its values on another group, fails to recognize the possibility of consensus even among differing cultures. In addition, the concept of respect for other cultures is, in & of itself, rooted in the Western tradition. Moreover, redistribution of resources constitutes one of the highest forms of respect for others. (3) The "diverse cultural values" argument, asserting that resource distribution is difficult, if not impossible, because different cultures & peoples place different values on resources, ignores the possibility of achieving consensus on at least some issues. Moreover, the argument is challenged by the argument that placing different values on different things is part of the natural "costs" of the beliefs of a particular culture. K. W. Larsen