Suchergebnisse

The Preface & Introduction to the 2nd Ed of Quincy Wright, A STUDY OF WAR (Chicago, Ill: U of Chicago Press, 1965). Reflections on mankind's historic struggle against suffering & death are offered. War, to be abolished, must be understood. 'No one man worked with more sustained care, compassion, & levelheadedness on the study of war, its cause, & its possible prevention than Quincy Wright.' In his book, he gathered a large body of relevant facts, insights, & far-ranging questions. The book first appeared in 1942. Wright's theory of war is summarized as 'a 4-factor model of the origins of war.' The 4 factors are: (1) technology, particularly as it applies to military matters; (2) law, particularly as it pertains to war & its initiations; (3) soc org, particularly in regard to such general-purpose pol'al units as tribes, nations, empires, & internat'l org's; (4) the distribution of opinions & att's concerning basic values. These 4 'factors correspond to the technological, legal, SP & biological-psychol'al-cultural levels of human life, respectively. 'Wright sought more to be empirically comprehensive than to be mathematically elegant. His book was & is 'a pathfinder in matters of substance.' He is seen to have a major contribution to peace res, integrating all kinds of evidence -historical, legal, behavioral, statistical, & mathematical -with the best pol'al judgment 'to arrive at a balanced & comprehensive understanding of reality. It is high time for pol'al sci'ts in the US & around the world to become more deeply familiar with the work of Quincy Wright. M. Maxfield.

At the heart of our research was a single basic question: What arms control and disarmament measures might be acceptable to Europeans in 1966, in 1971, and in 1976? And differently put: What would be Europe's attitude in those years either to arms competition or to arms control, and what particular policies would be most popular or least popular in Europe in this respect?This basic question implied four more detailed questions. The first, What is Europe now, in 1966, and where is it going for the 1971 to 1976 period? Is it going to be a Europe of nation-states with only marginal common functional arrangements on matters not central in importance to the concerns of its citizens? Or will it be to some extent substantially integrated, with some major policy decisions made by common institutions? Or will it be a common body politic, speaking with a single voice and developing common institutions for a wide range of decisions?Second, do Europeans in general approve or disapprove of arms control? Do they welcome the relaxation of tensions between America and Russia and between the East and West, or do they fear such relaxation?Third, what specific arms control measures are likely to be most acceptable to Europeans, and which arms control measures are likely to be least acceptable?And fourth, what are the strength, location, and time aspects of political support for specific policies, such as the policies of France and its President de Gaulle vis-à-vis the NATO Alliance and the United States?