Disarmament and Security, 1988-1989 Yearbook. USSR Academy of Sciences, IMEMO. Moscow: Novosti, 1989
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 153-154
ISSN: 2325-7784
111 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 153-154
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: American political science review, Band 85, Heft 4, S. 1433-1436
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 1022-1023
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 448-448
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 502-528
ISSN: 1086-3338
Soviet-American disarmament negotiations of the mid-1950s provide a critical case for evaluating theories of cooperation such as Tit-for-Tat and GRIT. Although both sides were close to agreement on the main terms of a treaty by May 1955, the negotiations were ultimately unsuccessful. On the basis of declassified U.S. documents, it now appears that the U.S. did not favor an agreement at the time: thus the game was not Prisoners' Dilemma, but Deadlock. The case reinforces the criticism of Tit-for-Tat that its unitary actor assumption ignores domestic second-image pressures for arming, and it also calls into question "first-image" explanations, such as GRIT, that focus on individual cognitive barriers to cooperation. The importance of understanding the links between internal political coalitions and external bargaining strategies is emphasized.
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 105, Heft 1, S. 174-175
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 502-528
ISSN: 0043-8871
World Affairs Online
In: Strategic Power: USA/USSR, S. 151-156
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 42, S. 502-528
ISSN: 0043-8871
Uses the historical case of the 1955 United Nations negotiations to evaluate current theories of cooperation.
In: International organization, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 147-171
ISSN: 0020-8183
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 147-171
ISSN: 1531-5088
In the study of comparative foreign policy, two schools of thought disagree over what accounts for variations in processes and outcomes of foreign policies within and between states. One holds that differences in the characteristics of the countries in question lead to differences in their foreign policies. The other argues that the important differences are not between countries but between issue-areas. A comparison of the Soviet Union and the United States in the issue-area of military policy (in particular, the process of weapons innovation) suggests that the policy processes differ substantially, contrary to what an issue-area approach would predict. On the other hand, the distinctions made by some students of political economy who focus on domestic structures appear to account well for differences between the U.S. and Soviet processes of innovation. The domestic structural approach should be applied to the study of comparative military policy as well as foreign economic policy.
In: Forum, Band 2, S. 1-8
ISSN: 0896-114X
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 340-341
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 14-18
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
World Affairs Online
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 14-18
ISSN: 1938-3282