Suchergebnisse

Quantifying national spending on wellness and prevention / George Miller, Charles Roehrig, Paul Hughes-Cromwick, Craig Lake -- Spillover effects of prescription drug withdrawals / John Cawley, John A. Rizzo -- The psychology of nutrition messages / Heather Schofield, Sendhil Mullainathan -- Evaluation criteria for report cards of healthcare providers / Jesse D. Schold -- Evaluating the value of genomic diagnostics : implications for clinical practice and public policy / Amalia M. Issa -- Achieving the healthy people 2010 goal of elimination of health disparities : what will it take? / Kevin Fiscella -- Influence, information overload, and information technology in health care / James B. Rebitzer, Mari Rege, Christopher Shepard -- Health disparities and direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical products / Rosemary J. Avery, Donald Kenkel, Dean R. Lillard, Alan Mathios, Hua Wang -- Pharmaceutical innovation and the longevity of Australians : a first look / Frank R. Lichtenberg, Gautier Duflos -- Introduction / Lorens Helmchen, Robert Kaestner, Anthony Lo Sasso

Electoral clientelism or vote buying has been regarded as undermining democratic institutions and weakening the accountability of the state towards its citizens, especially the poor. Social identity as a form of political mobilization may contribute to this, enabling support to be won with clientelist transfers. This paper reports data from a novel laboratory experiment designed to examine whether clientelism can be sustained as a political strategy, and whether identity impacts the nature or efficacy of clientelism. Specifically, we design a voting and leadership game in order to examine whether individuals vote for clientelist allocations by a leader even at the expense of more efficient and egalitarian allocations. We find group identity does not significantly impact the prevalence of clientelist plans. Leaders are more likely, however, to choose allocations that provide fewer benefits (lower rents) to themselves when they are part of the majority in-group than when they are in the minority.