Suchergebnisse

An important dimension of the future of fact is the status of political facts in research on public opinion. Analyzing the public's factual knowledge about public policy is central to addressing citizen competence yet more problematic than scholars have acknowledged. To show this, the authors first summarize a study of theirs that uses typical measures of citizens' information. In a survey of Illinois citizens, they measured factual perceptions about welfare policy. They found that citizens are not only uninformed about welfare but often misinformed—confident in erroneous perceptions. Such misinformation apparently has significant effects on attitudes toward welfare. The authors then consider some conceptual difficulties in research on citizens' information about policy. If the purpose is to ascertain how much information citizens possess, then the researcher must stipulate the relevant facts about an area of policy. But political facts are in large part politically determined, and the researcher often cannot identify precisely what the true and relevant facts are. Finally, the authors suggest a research approach in which citizens, in effect, choose the relevant facts themselves.

An important dimension of the future of fact is the status of political facts in research on public opinion. Analyzing the public's factual knowledge about public policy is central to addressing citizen competence, yet is problematic. To show this, scale data from 600+ IL citizens were used to measure factual perceptions about welfare policy. Findings indicate that citizens are not only uninformed about welfare but often misinformed -- confident in erroneous perceptions. Such misinformation apparently has significant effects on attitudes toward welfare. Conceptual difficulties in research on citizens' information about policy are considered. If the purpose is to ascertain how much information citizens possess, then the researcher must stipulate the relevant facts about an area of policy. But political facts are in large part politically determined, & the researcher often cannot identify precisely what are the true & relevant facts. A research approach in which citizens, in effect, choose the relevant facts themselves is suggested. 15 References. Adapted from the source document.

Scholars have documented the deficiencies in political knowledge among American citizens. Another problem, misinformation, has received less attention. People are misinformed when they confidently hold wrong beliefs. We present evidence of misinformation about welfare & show that this misinformation acts as an obstacle to educating the public with correct facts. Moreover, widespread misinformation can lead to collective preferences that are far different from those that would exist if people were correctly informed. The misinformation phenomenon has implications for two currently influential scholarly literatures: the study of political heuristics & the study of elite persuasion & issue framing. 2 Tables, 7 Figures, 49 References. Adapted from the source document.

THE RESEARCH REPORTED IN THIS ARTICLE EMPLOYS AN EXPERIMENTAL SURVEY TO ASCERTAIN THE RELATIVE INFLUENCE OF AFFECT AND COGNITION ON POLITICAL TOLERANCE JUDGEMENTS. IT STATES THAT PEOPLE'S SUPPORT OF VARIOUS GROUP'S ACTIVITIES STEMS LARGELY FROM THEIR GUT-LEVEL REACTON TO THE GROUPS RATHER THAN FROM CONSIDERED THOUGHT ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACTS. MOREOVER, AND CONTRARY TO CONVENTIONAL WISDOM, DELIBERATION TENDS TO REDUCE TOLERANCE. THIS PHENOMENON ARISES BECAUSE INSTRUCTING PEOPLE TO THINK ABOUT CONSEQUENCES LEADS THEM TO CONSIDER AN AMALGAM OF DEMOCRATIC VALUES, SOME OF WHICH ARE IN CONFLICT, AND OF WHICH TOLERANCE IS ONLY ONE.