The History of the German General Staff, 1657-1945.Walter Goerlitz , Brian Battershaw
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 59, Heft 5, S. 505-506
ISSN: 1537-5390
116 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 59, Heft 5, S. 505-506
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 660-663
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 63, Heft 3, S. 437-438
ISSN: 0033-362X
World Affairs Online
In: International journal of public opinion research, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 368-386
ISSN: 1471-6909
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 608, Heft 1, S. 157-178
ISSN: 1552-3349
An examination of the reception given Personal Influence when first published points to highly selective interpretations of the findings. The claims reviewers made for the influence of interpersonal communication relative to the mass media, especially in the political process, went even beyond those advanced by the authors. They overlooked not only the very restricted conceptualization of "effects" that guided the Decatur research but also previously accumulated evidence on multiple kinds of media influence. This article argues that the new conventional wisdom pitting personal versus mass media effects associated with this and previous studies in the Columbia tradition discouraged, however inadvertently, a coming generation of sociologists from researching the effects—particularly long-range effects—of mass communication. As a consequence, academic sociology came to cede much of the high ground it once occupied in media studies to political science and to more professionally oriented departments or schools of communication.
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 608, S. 157-178
ISSN: 1552-3349
An examination of the reception given Personal Influence when first published points to highly selective interpretations of the findings. The claims reviewers made for the influence of interpersonal communication relative to the mass media, especially in the political process, went even beyond those advanced by the authors. They overlooked not only the very restricted conceptualization of "effects" that guided the Decatur research but also previously accumulated evidence on multiple kinds of media influence. This article argues that the new conventional wisdom pitting personal versus mass media effects associated with this & previous studies in the Columbia tradition discouraged, however inadvertently, a coming generation of sociologists from researching the effects-particularly long-range effects-of mass communication. As a consequence, academic sociology came to cede much of the high ground it once occupied in media studies to political science & to more professionally oriented departments or schools of communication. Figures, References. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2006 The American Academy of Political and Social Science.]
In: Political communication, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 117-118
ISSN: 1058-4609
In: Political communication: an international journal, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 117-117
ISSN: 1091-7675
In: Political communication: an international journal, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 93-101
ISSN: 1091-7675
In: Political communication: an international journal, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 109-111
ISSN: 1091-7675
In: Political communication, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 109-112
ISSN: 1058-4609
In: Political communication, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 93-101
ISSN: 1091-7675
In: Political communication, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 109-111
ISSN: 1091-7675