156 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 262, Heft 1, S. 194-195
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 238, Heft 1, S. 193-194
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: American political science review, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 584-586
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 149-150
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Journal of the Royal African Society, Band XL, Heft CLXI, S. 365-367
ISSN: 1468-2621
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 211, Heft 1, S. 199-200
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 206, Heft 1, S. 174-174
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 202, Heft 1, S. 252-253
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: American political science review, Band 31, Heft 5, S. 972-973
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 591-592
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 201-202
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 169-183
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Constitution Unit, Department of Political Science, University College London: London, UK.
At Westminster the House of Commons has primacy over the House of Lords on most matters, and this applies particularly with respect to finance. Notably if the Lords passes an amendment that could affect taxation or spending, MPs may reject it citing the Commons' "financial privilege"; convention then suggests that the Lords should not insist on the amendment. Recent claims of financial privilege – most prominently on the Welfare Reform Bill in 2012 – revealed significant confusion about this procedure, and led to allegations that it had somehow been abused by government to unfairly deflect opposition. This report clarifies how financial privilege operates, and carefully evaluates the complaints that have been made against it. Built on this analysis, plus some consideration of arrangements in overseas legislatures, it offers recommendations for how arrangements at Westminster could be improved.
BASE
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics, Band 66, Heft 4, S. 772-797
ISSN: 1460-2482