Suchergebnisse

Three papers were presented: A. Hess, "Revolution in a Haggard Land: State, Society and Technology in Saudi Arabia," T. Mitchell, "The Object of Development: Egypt in the Discourse of the World Bank and USAID," and H. Islamoglu-Inan, "Transformation of the Ottoman Political Discourse." The workshop concluded with a general discussion led by T. Asad.

The SSRC'S Joint Near and Middle East Committee has organized a series of workshops on the state in its Middle Eastern context. The format consists of discussions of papers written by members of the committee, as well as of articles and chapters of books presented as background material by a small number of invited guests. A report on the first workshop, held at Buyukada, Istanbul, in September 1989 appeared in the MESA Bulletin 24 (1990), pages 179 to 183. A third workshop was held at St. Antony's College, Oxford in December 1990.

The SSRC's Joint Near and Middle East Committee has been organizing a series of workshops on the State in its Middle Eastern context. Its aim is to continue the discussions initiated at the Conference on State and Society which it organized at Aix-en-Provence in March 1988. The first workshop was held at Büyükada, Istanbul, in September 1989 under the general title of "State Creation and Transformation" and the second at Hanover, New Hampshire, in March 1990 under the title "Vocabularies of the State." A third and last workshop will be held in Oxford in December 1990, after which it is hoped to publish most of the papers in book form.

An intranasal (IN) diamorphine spray was investigated as a possible alternative to injectable diamorphine for maintenance treatment. Plasma morphine and 6-monoacetylmorphine (6MAM) concentrations and pharmacodynamic responses were measured for 4 h following intravenous (IV) and IN administration of 40 mg diamorphine in 4 patients prescribed injectable diamorphine. The two routes were primarily differentiated by the significantly greater speed and magnitude of peak plasma morphine and 6MAM concentrations for IV versus IN diamorphine. Beyond this initial peak, mean ratings suggested that withdrawal suppression and positive effects were at least as strong for IN compared to IV administration. All subjects gave favourable appraisals of the IN diamorphine spray, citing advantages including ease of use, the avoidance of needle hazards, and reduced stigma. IN administration may be an alternative or supplementary form of diamorphine maintenance and deserves serious further investigation.

Timothy Mitchell's article "The Limits of the State" in the March 1991 issue of thisReviewstimulated an unusual variety of interested comments. John Bendix, Bartholomew Sparrow, and Bertell Ollman offer critiques and suggestions from quite different points of view. In response, Mitchell clarifies further the distinctiveness of his own approach and its implications.