Trade and Power
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 524
ISSN: 0017-257X
222 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 524
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee: VRÜ = World comparative law : WCL, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 235-236
ISSN: 0506-7286
In: Journal of peace research, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 273-277
ISSN: 1460-3578
Clearly designed as a textbook for advanced students of international political economy, Gilpin's book is by far the best yet to come out of the American school. Students in Europe too will welcome his clear, fair-minded and comprehensive exposition of recent developments and debates in theories of the world economy-though Holsti's complaint in A Divided Discipline (1986), that American writers are oblivious to authors that are not American, with a few exceptions, still holds good. There is, however, a logical inconsistency at the heart of the book between his historical analysis and the conclusion that the United States has lost its hegemony and must share leadership with Japan. Alas, poor Europe!
In: Journal of public policy, Band 8, Heft 3-4, S. 409-410
ISSN: 1469-7815
In: International affairs, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 487-488
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International organization, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 751-752
ISSN: 1531-5088
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 1-17
ISSN: 0022-197X
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of peace research, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 273
ISSN: 0022-3433
In: International affairs, Band 64, Heft 2, S. 269-270
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 63, Heft 4, S. 647-648
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International organization, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 551-574
ISSN: 0020-8183
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of development studies: JDS, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 567-568
ISSN: 0022-0388
In: Journal of public policy, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 96-98
ISSN: 1469-7815
In: International organization, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 551-574
ISSN: 1531-5088
There is not much significant theorizing outside America and, within America, most recent theorizing has tended to become more abstract or else has falsely assumed that the United States is no longer a hegemonic power. But rather than criticize what has been done, I shall outline a different approach, identifying four major global structures—security, production, finance, and knowledge—within which states, corporate enterprises, and others operate. I conclude that America is dominant in all four structures. International studies therefore ought to develop a theory of empire which can be applied by U.S. policymakers, if these studies are to have any basis in reality and any practical use.
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 896-898
ISSN: 2052-465X