Suchergebnisse

Chronic diseases are the dominant issues for global public health in terms of mortality, morbidity, and cost, and they have been identified as such for >40 years. Despite their predominance, however, these diseases—cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, cancer, pulmonary disease, mental health, and dementia—attract little attention in the public health curriculum and even less from the funding community. We explore the rationales that have perpetuated this inability or unwillingness to match need with effort. We examine 3 concepts that impede changing this relationship: 1) the traditional contextual view of public health that emerged, to be sure with great success, in the post–World War II era; 2) the failure of public health to transition to economic development as the goal of health assistance; and 3) the unwillingness of public health to confront social, political, and economic policies as the foci of upstream drivers of the public's health. We conclude with a discussion of the need for public health to expand its horizon and tear down the walls of the silos that inhibit the emergence of relevant global public health.HighlightsGlobal chronic disease attracts scant attention from academia or funding agencies.Global public health needs a stronger focus on economic development.Public health needs to participate in national policy formulation, not merely react to it.Academic public health needs to break down the silos and walls of academia.

Background: Widespread access to good quality antihypertensive medicines is a critical component for reducing premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Poor-quality medicines pose serious health concerns; however, there remains a knowledge gap about the quality of cardiovascular medicines available in low- and middle-income countries.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the quality of generic antihypertensive medicines available in the retail market of a developing country.Methods: Samples of the 2 most commonly prescribed classes of antihypertensive medicines were collected from 3 states in 3 different geopolitical zones in Nigeria following a semirandom sampling framework. Medicine samples were purchased by mystery shoppers from 22 pharmacy outlets from 6 local government areas across the 3 states. Medicine quality was determined by measuring the amount of stated active pharmaceutical ingredient using high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection and classified according to their compliance to the specified pharmacopeia tolerance limits for each antihypertensive drug.Results: Amlodipine and lisinopril were identified as the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs in Nigeria. In total, 361 samples from 22 pharmacies were collected and tested. In total, 24.6% of amlodipine and 31.9% of lisinopril samples were of substandard quality and significantly more samples purchased in rural (59 of 161, 36.7%) compared with urban (32 of 200, 16%) outlets were found to be of substandard quality (p < 0.001). No falsified samples of either amlodipine or lisinopril were detected. There was large variation in price paid for the antihypertensive medicines (range ₦150 to ₦9,750). Of the 24 pharmacy outlets surveyed, 46% stated that patients did not always require a prescription and 21% had previously reported a medicine as falsified or substandard.Conclusions: More than one-quarter of some commonly prescribed antihypertensive medicines available in Nigeria may be of substandard quality. Enhanced quality assurance processes in low- and middle-income countries, such as Nigeria, are needed to support optimum management.HighlightsManagement of hypertension can largely be achieved through availability of and adherence to qualitative evidence-based medicines. There is very little research examining the quality of antihypertensive medicines available in the retail market of low- and middle-income countries.In total, 361 samples of amlodipine and lisinopril were collected from 22 pharmacies and their stated active pharmaceutical ingredient was measured.More than a quarter of some commonly prescribed antihypertensive medicines available in Nigeria appear to be of substandard quality (samples had more or less stated active pharmaceutical ingredient than stated in the United States Pharmacopeia–specified tolerance limits range).However, the proportion of substandard quality was not statistically different for amlodipine and lisinopril, and significantly more samples purchased in rural compared with urban outlets were of substandard quality.No falsified samples (containing no stated active pharmaceutical ingredient) of either amlodipine or lisinopril were detected.Enhanced quality assurance processes in low- and middle-income countries such as Nigeria are needed to support optimum management.