Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization
In: Tania Voon, CULTURAL PRODUCTS AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION, Cambridge University Press, 2007
120 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Tania Voon, CULTURAL PRODUCTS AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION, Cambridge University Press, 2007
SSRN
In: Pre-peer review draft of 23 December 2021: revised version in Melbourne Journal of International Law, Band 23, Heft 1
SSRN
In: QUT Law Review, Band 18(1), Heft 2018
SSRN
In: Forthcoming, Journal of World Investment & Trade
SSRN
In: Colin Picker, Heng Wang and Weihuan Zhou (eds), The China Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st Century Model (Hart Publishing), Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Melbourne Journal of International Law, Band 17, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Forthcoming, British Journal of American Legal Studies Volume 5 (2016)
SSRN
The dispute in EC – Seal Products raises fundamental questions about the relationship between publicmorals and international trade. Can WTO members impose trade restrictions based on moral or ethicalconcerns? Under what conditions can these concerns trump existing trade liberalization commitments?The dispute was filed in 2009 by Canada and Norway against the EU, which in the same year had bannedseal products from being imported and placed on its market. According to the EU, the policy wasintroduced in response to European moral outrage at the inhumane killing of seals. The EU seal regimeincluded a series of exceptions. In particular, it allowed imports of seal products hunted by Inuit or otherindigenous communities, as well as imports of seal products processed and re-exported by EU producers.This article discusses the Appellate Body's ruling in EC – Seal Products and some of the key legal andeconomic issues raised by this dispute. ; info:eu-repo/semantics/published
BASE
The EC – Seal Products dispute raises fundamental questions about the relationship between public morals and international trade. Can WTO members impose trade restrictions based on moral or ethical concerns? Under what conditions can these concerns trump existing trade liberalization commitments? The dispute was filed in 2009 by Canada and Norway against the EU, which in the same year had banned seal products from being imported and placed on its market. According to the EU, the policy was introduced in response to European moral outrage at the inhumane killing of seals. The EU seal regime included a series of exceptions. In particular, it allowed imports of seal products hunted by Inuit or other indigenous communities, as well as imports of seal products processed and re-exported by EU producers. This article discusses the Appellate Body's ruling in EC – Seal Products and some of the key legal and economic issues raised by this dispute.
BASE
In: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2015/70
SSRN
Working paper
In: Draft published in Tania Voon (ed), Trade Liberalisation and International Co-operation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (Edward Elgar, UK, 2013) 131–155
SSRN
In: Journal of international economic law, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 933-950
ISSN: 1464-3758
In: 14 World Intellectual Property Report 3-4
SSRN
In: Paradise Lost or Found? The Post-WTO International Legal Order (Utopian & Dystopian Possibilities), University of Tokyo Workshop
SSRN
Working paper