Suchergebnisse
Filter
97 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Developing a theory of robust democracy
In: Policy & politics, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1470-8442
While many democratic theorists recognise the necessity of reforming liberal democracies to keep pace with social change, they rarely consider what enables such reform. In this conceptual article, we suggest that liberal democracies are politically robust when they are able to continuously adapt and innovate how they operate when doing so is necessary to continue to serve key democratic functions. These functions include securing the empowered inclusion of those affected, collective agenda setting and will formation, and the making of joint decisions. Three current challenges highlight the urgency of adapting and innovating liberal democracies to become more politically robust: an increasingly assertive political culture, the digitalisation of political communication and increasing global interdependencies. A democratic theory of political robustness emphasises the need to strengthen the capacity of liberal democracies to adapt and innovate in response to changes, just as it helps to frame the necessary adaptations and innovations in times such as the present.
What can deliberative mini‐publics contribute to democratic systems?
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 893-914
ISSN: 1475-6765
AbstractCan deliberative mini‐publics contribute to deepening the democratic dimensions of electoral democracies? The question is framed in this article using a problem‐based approach to democratic theory–to count as democratic, political systems must accomplish three basic functions related to inclusion, communication and deliberation, and decision making. This approach is elaborated with an analysis of a real‐world case: a deliberative mini‐public with a citizens' assembly design, focused on urban planning convened in Vancouver, Canada. This example was chosen because the context was one in which the city's legacy institutions of representative democracy had significant democratic deficits in all three areas, and the mini‐public was a direct response to these deficits. It was found that Vancouver's deliberative mini‐public helped policy makers, activists and affected residents move a stalemated planning process forward, and did do so in ways that improved the democratic performance of the political system. Depending on when and how they are sequenced into democratic processes, deliberative mini‐publics can supplement existing legacy institutions and practices to deepen their democratic performance.
Can Deliberative Mini-Publics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship?
In: Journal of Politics, Band 77
SSRN
Can Deliberative Minipublics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship?
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 77, Heft 2, S. 562-574
ISSN: 1468-2508
Can Deliberative Minipublics Address the Cognitive Challenges of Democratic Citizenship?
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 77, Heft 2, S. 562-574
ISSN: 0022-3816
Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 2011, Heft 9(2)
SSRN
How Citizen Representatives Address the Epistemic Challenges of Democratic Citizenship
In: APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development
In: Perspectives on Politics, Band 9, Heft 2
SSRN
TheParticipediaProject: An Introduction
In: International public management journal, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 341-362
ISSN: 1559-3169
Authoritarian deliberation: the deliberative turn in Chinese political development
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 269-289
ISSN: 1537-5927
World Affairs Online
Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 269-289
ISSN: 1541-0986
Authoritarian rule in China is now permeated by a wide variety of deliberative practices. These practices combine authoritarian concentrations of power with deliberative influence, producing the apparent anomaly of authoritarian deliberation. Although deliberation is usually associated with democracy, they are distinct phenomena. Democracy involves the inclusion of individuals in matters that affect them through distributions of empowerments such as votes and rights. Deliberation is a mode of communication involving persuasion-based influence. Combinations of non-inclusive power and deliberative influence—authoritarian deliberation—are readily identifiable in China, probably reflecting failures of command authoritarianism under the conditions of complexity and pluralism produced by market-oriented development. The concept of authoritarian deliberation frames two possible trajectories of political development in China: the increasing use of deliberative practices stabilizes and strengthens authoritarian rule, or deliberative practices serve as a leading edge of democratization.
Intercultural Political Theory, Globalization, and Democratic Agency: A Pragmatic View
In: APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 269-290
ISSN: 1537-5927
The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory
In: Annual review of political science, Band 11, S. 387-412
ISSN: 1545-1577
Democratic theorists have paid increasing attention to problems of political representations over the past two decades. Interest is driven by (a) a political landscape within which electoral representation (b) interest in the fairness of electoral representation, particularly for minorities and women; (c) a renewed focus on political judgment within democratic theory; and (d) a new appreciation that participation and representation are complementary forms of citizenship. We review recent innovations within democratic theory, focusing especially on problems of fairness, constituency definition, deliberative political judgment, and new, nonelectoral forms of representations. Adapted from the source document.