The Shape of a Party
In: The Meaning of Partisanship, S. 209-228
88 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Meaning of Partisanship, S. 209-228
In: The Meaning of Partisanship, S. 185-208
In: The Meaning of Partisanship, S. 55-75
In: The Meaning of Partisanship, S. 76-100
In: The Meaning of Partisanship, S. 122-141
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 439-465
ISSN: 1552-7476
Contemporary political theory has made the question of the "people" a topic of sustained analysis. This article identifies two broad approaches taken—norm-based and contestation-based—and, noting some problems left outstanding, goes on to advance a complementary account centred on partisan practice. It suggests the definition of "the people" is closely bound up in the analysis of political conflict, and that partisans engaged in such conflict play an essential role in constructing and contesting different principled conceptions. The article goes on to show how such an account does not lead to a normatively hollow, purely historical conception of "the people," but rather highlights the normative importance of practices that, at the minimum, de-naturalise undesirable conceptions of the people and, at their best, give political legitimacy and a representative basis to those one might wish to see prosper.
In: European political science: EPS, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 117-123
ISSN: 1682-0983
In: American political science review, Band 105, Heft 2, S. 381-396
ISSN: 0003-0554
World Affairs Online
In: American political science review, Band 105, Heft 2, S. 381-396
ISSN: 1537-5943
Political justification figures prominently in contemporary political theory, notably in models of deliberative democracy. This article articulates and defends the essential role of partisanship in this process. Four dimensions of justification are examined in detail: the constituency to which political justifications are offered, the circumstances in which they are developed, the ways in which they are made inclusive, and the ways in which they are made persuasive. In each case, the role of partisanship is probed and affirmed. Partisanship, we conclude, is indispensable to the kind of political justification needed to make the exercise of collective authority responsive to normative concerns.
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 58, Heft 4, S. 809-828
ISSN: 1467-9248
This article lays out and defends the role of political parties in cultivating a democratic ethos among citizens. It argues that citizens' commitment to the democratic idea of self-rule requires positive conviction of the worth of collective political agency, and suggests that this conviction draws on three main sources, characterised as normative, motivational and executive. The article shows theoretically why parties are able to cultivate all three sources in a way no other political actor can match, thus constituting a unique and indispensable mode of civic engagement. Moreover, it proposes that the widely noted shortcomings of parties in contemporary democracy leave this basic capacity unimpaired, indeed that certain important developments herald renewed opportunities.
In: British journal of political science, Band 45, Heft 2, S. 235-251
ISSN: 1469-2112
Long-term immigrants often have the option but not the obligation to acquire citizenship in their state of residence. Contrary to the received wisdom, this article defends the idea of mandatory citizenship for immigrants. It suggests that the current asymmetry in the distribution of political obligations between native-born citizens and immigrants is unfair. It also argues that mandatory citizenship is required by the principle that those who persistently affect others should share a democratic setting. Finally, it claims that mandatory citizenship is more compatible with the ideal of democratic equality and more conducive to a stable society.
In: Politics, philosophy & economics, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 357-381
ISSN: 1741-3060
In this article, we examine how language and linguistic membership might feature in luck egalitarianism, what a luck-egalitarian theory of linguistic justice would look like, and, finally, what the emphasis on language teaches us about the validity of standard luck-egalitarian assumptions. We show that belonging to one language group rather than another is a morally arbitrary feature and that where membership of a specific linguistic group affects individual chances, the effects of such bad brute luck ought to be neutralized on the luck-egalitarian view. We assess two ways of redressing those kinds of unjustified inequalities: the 'universal language' option and the 'linguistic advantages for all' option. But we also argue, in the second part, that exploring luck egalitarianism through the lens of language exposes some difficulties intrinsic in many existent luck-egalitarian theories. We argue that treating circumstances one identifies with as choices is problematic. In addition, we argue that the linguistic preconditions of both the capacity to be responsible as well the exercise of responsibility complicate the idea of individual responsibility on which most luck-egalitarian theories rely. We conclude by suggesting the need to develop a luck-egalitarian theory of justice which is less reliant on causal features of the distinction between choice and circumstance and which is more sensitive to the idea of collective cooperation as opposed to individual responsibility. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]