Distributive Justice and Desert
In: Journal of social philosophy, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 421-438
ISSN: 1467-9833
3610 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of social philosophy, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 421-438
ISSN: 1467-9833
In: Public choice, Band 92, Heft 1-2, S. 203-207
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Review of social economy: the journal for the Association for Social Economics, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 1-17
ISSN: 1470-1162
In: Public choice, Band 92, Heft 1-2, S. 203-206
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Social philosophy today: an annual journal from the North American Society for Social Philosophy, Band 9, S. 157-169
ISSN: 2153-9448
In: Legal Theory 5 (1999): 149-69
SSRN
In: Journal of global ethics, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 281-301
ISSN: 1744-9634
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2021-02
SSRN
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2021-02
SSRN
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 172-195
ISSN: 1471-6437
THE INAPPLICABILITY THESISThere is a gap between the idea of distributive justice and the many factors that are morally relevant for decision making on economic issues. Only to a degree can this gap be attributed to the distance between "ideal reach" and "practical grasp," to the legitimate difference in detail between an abstractly delineated economic scenario and a concrete set of circumstances, and to the disparate idioms and metaphors of theoretical and practical discourse. Rather, the gap indicates a fundamental problem with the concept of distributive justice. The problem, that is here termed the "inapplicability thesis," is that even if distributive justice in abstract formulation were to be accepted as a value, its application in economic decision making is indeterminate.
In: University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 15/2013
SSRN
Working paper
In: Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law (Hugh Collins, Gillian Lester & Virginia Mantouvalou eds., OUP 2018) Ch. 8
SSRN
In: Elements in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant
This Element argues that although Kant's political thought does not tackle issues of global poverty and inequality head on, it nonetheless offers important conceptual and normative resources to think of our global socioeconomic duties. It delves into the Kantian duty to enter a rightful condition beyond the state and shows that a proper understanding of this duty not only leads us to acknowledge a duty of right to assist states that are unable to fulfil the core functions of a state, but also provides valuable hints at what just transnational trade relations and a just regulation of immigration should look like.