International criminal justice after World War II
In: Vojno delo, Band 67, Heft 5, S. 89-102
2270549 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Vojno delo, Band 67, Heft 5, S. 89-102
In: Quarterly / AFLA, Africa Legal Aid: making human rights a reality, Heft 2, S. 6-7
ISSN: 1384-282X
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 974-991
ISSN: 0275-0392
In: Human rights quarterly, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 974-991
ISSN: 1085-794X
In: International Journal of Transitional Justice, Band 3, Heft 2
SSRN
In: International and comparative criminal justice
This collection discusses appropriate methodologies for comparative research and applies this to the issue of trial transformation in the context of achieving justice in post-conflict societies. In developing arguments in relation to these problems, the authors use international sentencing and the question of victims' interests and expectations as a focus.
SSRN
Working paper
In: International and comparative criminal justice
In: Journal of Politics and Law, Band 4, Heft 2
SSRN
In: iCourts Working Paper Series, No. 223 (2020)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, Band 11
SSRN
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 974-991
ISSN: 0275-0392
Examines US legal arguments objecting to creation of an International Criminal Court (ICC), and argues that these are founded on US exceptionalism and commitment to power politics.
Blog: Elcano Royal Institute
On 1 February 2024 Armenia became the 124th State Party to join the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Located in The Hague (the Netherlands), the ICC's mandate is to prosecute individuals for the most serious crimes of international concern, such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression, […]
La entrada The budgetary instrumentalisation of international criminal justice se publicó primero en Elcano Royal Institute.
In: European political science review: EPSR, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 567-591
ISSN: 1755-7747
Despite the fact that international courts have proven popular in the last 20 years, systematic and empirical inquiry to determine whether they are beginning to realize their objectives is a fairly recent phenomenon. Support among the publics in the affected countries is critical to their success for, as deGuzman writes, '… the globalization of communications increasingly means that an institution's legitimacy depends on the opinions of ordinary citizens around the world'. I develop a theory of public opinion regarding international criminal justice and test it on support for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), among peoples of the former Yugoslavia. I contend that support for the ICTY is filtered through individuals' perceptions of the past, present, and future. As one's beliefs about whether conditions are good or improving grow more positive, such positive perceptions are generalized to extend to international institutions that play a major role in shaping those conditions. In addition, I argue that support for the ICTY is strongly influenced by an individual's views of the legitimacy and morality of the law. Ethnicity is also important in differentiating levels of support across the peoples of the former Yugoslavia.