The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
9157 results
Sort by:
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Volume 35, Issue 1, p. 15-38
ISSN: 0020-8183
World Affairs Online
In: International organization, Volume 25, Issue 4, p. 836-844
ISSN: 1531-5088
On March 5, 1970, the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) went into effect, having been ratified by 47 states including the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The treaty legally bars these three nuclear powers from transferring atomic weapons to nonnuclear states and formally pledges those nonnuclear states signing the treaty to refrain from developing such weapons or acquiring them from other powers. It thus caps a long effort by the United States to inhibit—so long as it could not preclude—the spread of nuclear weapons and to avoid the potential instabilities associated with that spread.
In: Dispatch / US Department of State, Office of Public Communication, Bureau of Public Affairs, Volume 5, Issue 14, p. 183-184
ISSN: 1051-7693
In: International organization, Volume 35, Issue 1, p. 15-38
ISSN: 1531-5088
Three-and-a-half decades have passed since the energy of the atom was used in warfare. Yet rather than nuclear doom, the world has seen a surprising nuclear stability thus far. Equally remarkable is the fact that over the same period nuclear technology has spread to more than two score nations, yet only a small fraction have chosen to develop nuclear weaponry. A third notable point has been the development of an international nonproliferation regime—a set of rules, norms, and institutions, which haltingly and albeit imperfectly, has discouraged the proliferation of nuclear weapons capability.The wrong policies in the 1980s—i.e., policies that put the United States in an overly rigid position on the nuclear fuel cycle or which lower the priority the United States gives to the issue in security terms—could still sacrifice the current modest success in regime maintenance. Unfortunately, there is no simple solution to the political problem of proliferation. But given the difficulty of constructing international institutions in a world of sovereign states, and the risks attendant upon their collapse, political wisdom begins with efforts to maintain the existing regime with its presumption against proliferation.
In: The Jerusalem journal of international relations, Volume 8, Issue 4, p. 100-143
ISSN: 0363-2865
World Affairs Online
In: Orbis: FPRI's journal of world affairs, Volume 27, Issue 3, p. 741-759
ISSN: 0030-4387
World Affairs Online
In: Non-proliferation, Disarmament and Arms Control
COOPERATIVE ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION TREATIES, AGREEMENTS AND CONTROL REGIMES ; COOPERATIVE ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION TREATIES, AGREEMENTS AND CONTROL REGIMES ; CONTENTS ; PREFACE ; Chapter 1 ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION: A CATALOG OF TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS* ; SUMMARY ; INTRODUCTION ; National Security, Arms Control, and Nonproliferation ; The Arms Control Agenda ; ARMS CONTROL BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION ; The Early Years: SALT I and SALT II ; The Interim Agreement on Offensive Arms.
In: Foreign affairs, Volume 59, Issue 4, p. 875-894
ISSN: 0015-7120
World Affairs Online
In: Foreign policy bulletin: the documentary record of United States foreign policy, Volume 5, Issue 1, p. 26-33
ISSN: 1745-1302
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Volume 22, Issue 1, p. 44-45
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: IOP Concise Physics
In: Arms control today, Volume 46, Issue 10, p. 11
ISSN: 0196-125X