Suchergebnisse

579Jurisdiction — Subject-matter jurisdiction — Personal jurisdiction over defendants — Merits — United States Constitution — Power of federal courts restricted to cases and controversies — Litigant must have suffered or been threatened with injury traceable to defendant — Dispute must be live at time of courts' consideration — Parties must have concrete interest in outcome — Circumstances under which cases moot — Availability of partial remedy — Whether rescuing case from mootnessTreaties — Interpretation — Object and purpose — Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 1980 — Object and purpose — Country of habitual residence — Return orders — Re-return orders — Power of District Court to reverse return order — Necessity of expediting orders — Conditions for granting stays — Best interests of childRelationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — United States domestic law — United States Constitution — International Child Abduction Remedies Act 1988 — Child custody — Abrogating Bekier v. Bekier — The law of the United States

"Provides a comprehensive account of the legal drama that established the 'separate but equal' doctrine. Details the postwar Reconstruction era; the legal issues involved in Plessy v. Ferguson; the spread of discriminatory Jim Crow laws; the effects of segregation on African Americans; and the efforts to overturn Plessy. Includes biographies, primary sources, and more"--

Publikuojamas žymaus vokiečių filosofo N. Hartmanno (1882–1950) sesers Fridos Hartmann laiškas jo bičiuliui Vosyliui Sezemanui (1884–1963). Dar nuo gimnazijos laikų jie palaikė draugiškus santykius, gyveno vienas kito namuose, kvietėsi vienas kitą į konferencijas, recenzavo vienas kito veikalus. Kai V. Sezemanas po šešerių nelaisvės metų paleistas iš sovietinio lagerio grįžo namo, parašė laišką N. Hartmannui, tačiau jo jau nebuvo gyvo. Todėl jo sesuo šiame laiške aprašė paskutines savo brolio gyvenimo dienas. Spausdinamo laiško originalas saugomas Vilniaus universiteto bibliotekos Rannkraščių skyriuje (R. 193).

William V. O'Brien, Professor of Government Emeritus at Georgetown
University, died on July 8, 2003, at his home in Washington of head
injuries suffered in a fall.

Letter from Mr. Leonel V. Anguiano, Delegate of the National Cooperative Party to Gen. Alvaro Obregón, congratulating him on his election victory. / Carta del Sr. Leonel V. Anguiano, Delegado del Partido Cooperatista Nacional al Gral. Alvaro Obregón, felicitándolo por su triunfo electoral.

Telegram from Mr. Martín V. González to Gen. Alvaro Obregón, informing him of Mr. Juan Garza García's political maneuvers against him. / Telegrama del Sr. Martín V. González al Gral. Alvaro Obregón, informándole de las maniobras políticas del Sr. Juan Garza García en contra del Gral. Obregón.

Alternativna kulturna gibanja, ki so se širila v osemdesetih letih 20. stoletja v polju množične kulture skozi subkulturno udejstvovanje, so pomenila zoperstavljanje dominantni kulturi in odklon represivnemu državnemu nadzoru. Vse pogosteje so postajala subverzivna, vendar tolerirana oblika izražanja političnega odpora proti neučinkovitemu vladajočemu sistemu socialističnega samoupravljanja. Zagovarjala so ustvarjalnost, nove vedenjske in življenjske vzorce. Alternativna kulturna gibanja z osrednjimi predstavniki so v osemdesetih letih sestavljala kritični val, ki je povzročil, da je Slovenija v liberalizaciji, demokratizaciji in strpnosti prehitela preostali del države.
V osrednjem delu se prispevek osredotoča na predstavitev pomembnejših predstavnikov alternativne kulturne scene, še zlasti pa na kompleksno kulturno-umetniško figuro, »konglomerat FV«, ki je v osemdesetih letih predstavljala ustvarjalno gledališko in glasbeno skupino, v kateri je združevala aktualne družbene vsebine z inovativnimi tehničnimi in umetniškimi sredstvi; v okviru klubskega programa FV diska pa je združevala in predstavljala raznoliko kulturno umetniško produkcijo in omogočala prostor druženja alternativne javnosti ter dokumentirala dogajanje s pomočjo lastne videoprodukcije.

Germany v. N. Decision No. 2 WD 12.04. At <http://www.bverwg.de>.Bundesverwaltungsgericht (German Federal Administrative Court), June 21, 2005.On June 21, 2005, in Germany v. N, the Federal Administrative Court of Germany (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) acquitted a soldier charged with disobeying an order in violation of his military duty of obedience and loyal service. The soldier, a major in the Federal Armed Forces (Bundeswehr), had refused to participate in a military software project that he feared could support Operation Iraqi Freedom. The major based his refusal on his belief that the Iraqi war was illegal and that, as a result, he was permitted to refuse the order under his constitutional right of freedom of conscience.2 The court held that in view of the serious reservations that exist about the legality of Operation Iraqi Freedom and also about Germany's position in that conflict, the soldier's right to freedom of conscience required that he be offered alternative tasks unrelated to a war that he reasonably believed to be illegal.

In Trump v. Hawaii, the United States Supreme Court upheld admissions restrictions imposed by the Trump administration on nationals of certain countries for putative security reasons. In so doing, the Court's opinion reaffirmed judicial deference to the president on matters relating to immigration. Although the decision marked a Trump administration victory at the end of a protracted judicial clash, the lower courts are likely to continue operating as a check on aggressively restrictionist policies pursued by the administration on other fronts.