Fiscal Pressures on the Central City: The Impact of Commuters, Nonwhites, and Overlapping Governments
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 576
ISSN: 1938-274X
807 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 576
ISSN: 1938-274X
In: The Garland Library of war and peace
In: NOMOS - American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy 9
Moral universalism, or the idea that some system of ethics applies to all people regardless of race, color, nationality, religion, or culture, must have a plurality over which to range - a plurality of diverse persons, nations, jurisdictions, or localities over which morality asserts a universal authority. The contributors to Moral Universalism and Pluralism, the latest volume in the NOMOS series, investigate the idea that, far from denying the existence of such pluralities, moral universalism presupposes it. At the same time, the search for universally valid principles of morality is deeply challenged by diversity. The fact of pluralism presses us to explore how universalist principles interact with ethical, political, and social particularisms. These important essays refuse the answer that particularisms should simply be made to conform to universal principles, as if morality were a mold into which the diverse matter of human society and culture could be pressed. Rather, the authors bring philosophical, legal and political perspectives to bear on the core questions: Which forms of pluralism are conceptually compatible with moral universalism, and which ones can be accommodated in a politically stable way? Can pluralism generate innovations in understandings of moral duty? How is convergence on the validity of legal and moral authority possible in circumstances of pluralism? As the contributors to the book demonstrate in a wide variety of ways, these normative, conceptual, and political questions deeply intertwine.Contributors: Kenneth Baynes, William A. Galston, Barbara Herman, F. M. Kamm, Benedict Kingsbury, Frank I. Michelman, William E. Scheuerman, Gopal Sreenivasan, Daniel Weinstock, and Robin West
Component 1.3.5 – Improving Stakeholder Engagement Component 1.3.6 – Cases Studies The specific objective of this component was to support good practice in stakeholder engagement within the transboundary context of MSP. The aim was to engage stakeholders to discuss about the Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) process and its cross-border dimension as well as to support dissemination of good practice in stakeholder engagement, and so participate in the coherence of national planning plans. The approach retained for stakeholder engagement was to carry out multisector workshops relying on information produced by other actions of the project and stakeholders interviews to test different engagement methods: interviews, workshops, post-it sessions, Role-play "MSP challenge". ; This report was produced as part of SIMNORAT Project (Grant Agreement N0. EASME/EMFF/2015/1.2.1.3/03/SI2.742089). Competition for maritime space – for renewable energy equipment, aquaculture and other uses – has highlighted the need to manage our waters more coherently. Maritime spatial planning (MSP) works across borders and sectors to ensure human activities at sea take place in an efficient, safe and sustainable way. That is why the European Parliament and the Council have adopted a legislation to create a common framework for maritime spatial planning in Europe. The Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 (said Maritime Spatial Planning Directive) establishes a framework in order to reduce conflicts between sectors and create synergies between different activities, to encourage investment – by creating predictability, transparency and clearer rules, to increase cross-border cooperation – between EU countries to develop energy grids, shipping lanes, pipelines, submarine cables and other activities, but also to develop coherent networks of protected areas, and to protect the environment – through early identification of impact and opportunities for multiple use of space. The SIMNORAT project (Supporting ...
BASE
In: The Manchester School, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 151-177
ISSN: 1467-9957
In: Economica, Band 37, Heft 148, S. 441
In: Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies, Vol. 14
World Affairs Online
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/njp.32101058592674
A lecture on the value of the American union, by H. S. Foote.-- A lecture on the trials and dangers of frontier life, as exemplified in the history of Texas, by Sam Houston.-- A philosophical view of the American government, by W. H. [i.e. H. W.] Hilliard. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: The Manchester School, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 374-394
ISSN: 1467-9957
In: Economica, Band 36, Heft 144, S. 450
In: Current anthropology, Band 22, Heft 6, S. 625-638
ISSN: 1537-5382
In: The Economic Journal, Band 100, Heft 402, S. 756
In: Economica, Band 53, Heft 212, S. 447
In: Economica, Band 53, Heft 212, S. 538