Suchergebnisse

La evolución del precedente judicial del Consejo de Estado frente al tema de la responsabilidad extracontractual del Estado colombiano por actos terroristas ha venido decantando unas pautas que se deben tener en cuenta para poder determinar o imputarle responsabilidad al Estado en los eventos en que un ente Estatal omite la advertencia o la prevención de una amenaza de un acto terrorista, o cuando pone en riesgo a la población donde se encuentra asentada una base militar que es declarada objetivo de los grupos ilegales terroristas, generando así una falla del servicio en la protección de la población o colocándola en riesgo, lo cual no está obligada a soportar. El objetivo del presente trabajo consiste en determinar, con fundamento en la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado, cuándo el Estado colombiano está en el deber jurídico de indemnizar a las personas cuando han sufrido un daño a causa de un atentado terrorista. Se parte de los antecedentes a nivel internacional acerca del objeto de estudio y se realiza un estudio de las principales sentencias del Consejo de Estado acerca de responsabilidad estatal por este tipo de actos, para el desarrollo del mismo se utilizara el método deductivo en razón de que se iniciará la investigación de los conceptos generales de la de la responsabilidad extracontractual del Estado y los diferentes títulos de imputación de responsabilidad estatal, aplicándolos de manera especial frente a actos terroristas. Como conclusión, se establece que en Colombia, muy a pesar de que existe un campo normativo mediante el cual las víctimas de terrorismo pueden solicitar alguna indemnización o compensación, es la jurisdicción contenciosa administrativa a la que las víctimas prefieren acudir y así obtener una reparación integral a sus daños ocasionados por un acto terrorista que el Estado debió evitar. ; The evolution of the Judicial Precedent of the Council of State, regarding the issue of the non-contractual liability of the Colombian State for terrorist acts, has been setting some guidelines ...

In a number of recent investor-state arbitrations on the basis of intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (BITs), respondent states, supported by the EU Commission, have argued that their accession to the EU has rendered existing BITs with old EU Member States obsolete. This argument is mainly based on Articles 30 and 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, dealing with the effect of subsequent treaties addressing (partly) the same subject matter. This contribution discusses the treaty law implications and explains why, so far, investment tribunals have rejected the idea that BITs and the EU treaties address the same subject matter or would be so far incompatible that BITs have become obsolete.

The title of this journal Court Based On Good Goverment Principles. The main problems to be studied are: (1) how the legal obedience of administrative officials carry out the verdict of administrative court based on good government principles?; (2) Is the arrangement about the obedience of administrative officials already appropriate with good government principles?. The method of study use is the juridical normative method. The Approaching of problems use statute approach, conseptual approach, and case approach. Research data source is taken from primary and secondary legal materials. The collected data is qualitatively analyzed by a normative juridical approach. The result of this research are : first, the legal obedience of administration officials is to be consistent do the verdict of administrative court in the framework of implementation good good government principles. The obedience based on legal awareness. Legal awareness and legal obedience very needed for law enforcement in Indonesia. Awareness and legal obedience very needed by every person, in the same manner as the purpose of law. The administrative officials as people which have positions needed to be stressed for being obedience the verdict of administrative court based on good government principles and alse as example to other people. Second, based on article 116 Law Number 5 Year 1986 about Administration Court cpuld be understood that the arrangement obedience the administrative officials not appropriate with good government principles. Based on the research result is recommended, that first, the Administration court based on Law Number 5 Year in the essence is good enough. The obedience of administrative officials still less make the verdict of administration court no run well, so needed to make birocration reformation especially to the interpretation of the legal awareness or increasing awareness from government to all administrative officials as formed the respect existence to the body of government; second, Inobedience the administrative court to the verdict of administration court could be categorize criminal. Third, for the verdict of administration court be able to be done well by administrative officials, so needed control body, although internal and external, hereby the duty of Obudsman National Commision very importence to give attention to the administrative official to do the verdict of administration court. Keywords: The Obedience Of Administrative Officials, Administrative Court, Good Government Principles

Colleges and universities that receive federal funding are legally required to respond to all sexual assault complaints on their campuses. Numerous laws and guidance documents address the specific obligations of higher education institutions in their responses to complaints; however, many colleges and universities have failed to meet these obligations. This Note examines the requirements colleges and universities must comply with when responding to sexual assault complaints. It then highlights three high-profile mishandlings of sexual assault cases by colleges and universities and analyzes the benefits and drawbacks of allowing campus disciplinary committees to independently respond to sexual assaults. This Note then suggests that law enforcement should be integrated into the campus response procedures, specifies particular procedural changes that are necessary in campus disciplinary proceedings, and suggests alternative penalties to ensure institution compliance. Finally, this Note addresses proposed legislation aimed at improving the response of institutions to sexual assault on college and university campuses.

On June 21, 2001, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Basic Law defining the principles of the budgetary system of Ukraine – the Budget Code of Ukraine. However, till now unregulated norms of separate articles of the Budget Code of Ukraine remained: 1) the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine does not define the procedure for borrowing to local budgets, as required by Article 74 of the Budget Code of Ukraine;2) the legislation does not define specific issues of subventions from the State Budget of Ukraine, as required by Article 105 of the Budget Code of Ukraine.3) the special law does not regulate the procedure for state control over compliance with budget legislation and prosecution for budget violations;4) The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine did not ensure the implementation of Articles 59 and 60 of the Budget Code in relation to the establishment of uniform forms of reporting by the bodies of collection of taxes and fees and submission of information to the Accounting Chamber on this issue etc.Problems related to the regulation of management and financial relations were at the center of attention of domestic scholars - specialists in administrative and financial law, among them VB Averyanov, Yu.P. Bityak, V.M. Garaschuk, MP Kucheryavenko, A.T. Komzyuk, OA Lukashev, A.O. Monaenko, V.Ya. Nastyuk, O.P. Ryabchenko, IV Soloshkina, and others.Scientificly significant issues related to various aspects of lawmaking were considered in the works of domestic and foreign scientists, namely: I.O. Bilya O.M. Kostenka V.F. Pogorilka, SV Poleninoy, A.O. Selivanova V.Yu. Ragozina, Yu.S. Shemshuchenko, I.D. Shootka and others.Paper objective – Rules of external expression of the contents of the norms of the Budget Code of Ukraine.The text of the Budget Code of Ukraine was created according to the general rules of legal technique. Some examples of constructs of norms of BCU, which need to be revised, are considered.First, Article 94, paragraph 3, of the Budget Code of Ukraine states as follows: "The total amount of financial resources for each type of intergovernmental transfers specified in paragraphs 6-8 of part one of Article 97 of this Code shall be calculated on the basis of state social standards and norms established by law and Other normative-legal acts ".Determine the ways (techniques) of presenting this rule of law:– by the degree of abstract presentation – casuistic;– by degree of completeness of presentation – blanket;– in the form of the proposal – in the form of narrative proposal.This clause of Article 94 of the BCU can not be implemented by public administration bodies without the adoption of another, special law or by-law normative-legal act.Secondly, the integrity of the public finance management process is impossible without systematic and qualitative control. Article 113 of the BCU determines the powers of the state financial control bodies to control compliance with budget legislation.The control functions of the public administration bodies of Ukraine should be stated as follows:1) The Budget Code of Ukraine does not specify specific directions and objects of control, but the system, principles and tasks of public financial control (in Article 113);2) determine, in a special law, the system, forms, methods, types of public financial control;3) by subordinate acts to establish specific rules for carrying out control activities by a specific public administration body in relation to a particular object.Thirdly, the norms of the Budget Code of Ukraine on legal liability for violation of budget legislation are set out in a non-systematic way in violation of the rules of legal technique.Conclusions of the research. 1. The legal electronics industry covers knowledge of the rules of law and the creation of a process of various legal documents outlining the content written regulations, preparing legal documents, legal analysis of the expression of legal rights and duties of others.2. Accurate and strict compliance with all legal requirements technique of writing can characterize draft legal act as perfect technically and indicate the proper legal culture for its preparation and execution.3. There is no terminological unity and the structural rules of transforming information on public finances into the norms of the budget legislation are violated.4. To achieve proper design and use of legal structures in the budget law should be general rules, principles present in the general legislative act – the Budget Code of Ukraine, and under it a few laws and regulations, which will trace structuring and consistency, clarity, simplicity and immediacy of legal material. ; Освещены отдельные недостатки юридической техники изложения отдельных норм Бюджетного кодекса Украины. Доказано, что бюджетное законодательство должно образовывать целостный регулятивный механизм. Особое внимание при совершенствовании правовых норм следует обращать на технико-юридические аспекты, которые отражают информацию в нормативно-правовом акте. Во исполнение норм Бюджетного кодекса Украины следует разработать и принять десятки законодательных и подзаконных актов, без которых воплощение правовых предписаний в жизнь не происходит. ; Висвітлено окремі недоліки юридичної техніки викладення окремих норм Бюджетного кодексу України. Доведено, що бюджетне законодавство повинно утворювати цілісний регулятивний механізм. Наголошено, що особливу увагу при вдосконаленні правових норм слід звертати на техніко-юридичні аспекти, які відбивають інформацію в нормативно-правовому акті. На виконання норм Бюджетного кодексу України слід розробити і прийняти десятки законодавчих і підзаконних актів, без яких утілення правових приписів у життя не відбувається.

Висвітлено окремі недоліки юридичної техніки викладення окремих норм Бюджетного кодексу України. Доведено, що бюджетне законодавство повинно утворювати цілісний регулятивний механізм. Наголошено, що особливу увагу при вдосконаленні правових норм слід звертати на техніко-юридичні аспекти, які відбивають інформацію в нормативно-правовому акті. На виконання норм Бюджетного кодексу України слід розробити і прийняти десятки законодавчих і підзаконних актів, без яких утілення правових приписів у життя не відбувається. ; Освещены отдельные недостатки юридической техники изложения отдельных норм Бюджетного кодекса Украины. Доказано, что бюджетное законодательство должно образовывать целостный регулятивный механизм. Особое внимание при совершенствовании правовых норм следует обращать на технико-юридические аспекты, которые отражают информацию в нормативно-правовом акте. Во исполнение норм Бюджетного кодекса Украины следует разработать и принять десятки законодательных и подзаконных актов, без которых воплощение правовых предписаний в жизнь не происходит. ; On June 21, 2001, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Basic Law defining the principles of the budgetary system of Ukraine – the Budget Code of Ukraine. However, till now unregulated norms of separate articles of the Budget Code of Ukraine remained: 1) the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine does not define the procedure for borrowing to local budgets, as required by Article 74 of the Budget Code of Ukraine;2) the legislation does not define specific issues of subventions from the State Budget of Ukraine, as required by Article 105 of the Budget Code of Ukraine.3) the special law does not regulate the procedure for state control over compliance with budget legislation and prosecution for budget violations;4) The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine did not ensure the implementation of Articles 59 and 60 of the Budget Code in relation to the establishment of uniform forms of reporting by the bodies of collection of taxes and fees and submission of information to the Accounting Chamber on this issue etc.Problems related to the regulation of management and financial relations were at the center of attention of domestic scholars - specialists in administrative and financial law, among them VB Averyanov, Yu.P. Bityak, V.M. Garaschuk, MP Kucheryavenko, A.T. Komzyuk, OA Lukashev, A.O. Monaenko, V.Ya. Nastyuk, O.P. Ryabchenko, IV Soloshkina, and others.Scientificly significant issues related to various aspects of lawmaking were considered in the works of domestic and foreign scientists, namely: I.O. Bilya O.M. Kostenka V.F. Pogorilka, SV Poleninoy, A.O. Selivanova V.Yu. Ragozina, Yu.S. Shemshuchenko, I.D. Shootka and others.Paper objective – Rules of external expression of the contents of the norms of the Budget Code of Ukraine.The text of the Budget Code of Ukraine was created according to the general rules of legal technique. Some examples of constructs of norms of BCU, which need to be revised, are considered.First, Article 94, paragraph 3, of the Budget Code of Ukraine states as follows: "The total amount of financial resources for each type of intergovernmental transfers specified in paragraphs 6-8 of part one of Article 97 of this Code shall be calculated on the basis of state social standards and norms established by law and Other normative-legal acts ".Determine the ways (techniques) of presenting this rule of law:– by the degree of abstract presentation – casuistic;– by degree of completeness of presentation – blanket;– in the form of the proposal – in the form of narrative proposal.This clause of Article 94 of the BCU can not be implemented by public administration bodies without the adoption of another, special law or by-law normative-legal act.Secondly, the integrity of the public finance management process is impossible without systematic and qualitative control. Article 113 of the BCU determines the powers of the state financial control bodies to control compliance with budget legislation.The control functions of the public administration bodies of Ukraine should be stated as follows:1) The Budget Code of Ukraine does not specify specific directions and objects of control, but the system, principles and tasks of public financial control (in Article 113);2) determine, in a special law, the system, forms, methods, types of public financial control;3) by subordinate acts to establish specific rules for carrying out control activities by a specific public administration body in relation to a particular object.Thirdly, the norms of the Budget Code of Ukraine on legal liability for violation of budget legislation are set out in a non-systematic way in violation of the rules of legal technique.Conclusions of the research. 1. The legal electronics industry covers knowledge of the rules of law and the creation of a process of various legal documents outlining the content written regulations, preparing legal documents, legal analysis of the expression of legal rights and duties of others.2. Accurate and strict compliance with all legal requirements technique of writing can characterize draft legal act as perfect technically and indicate the proper legal culture for its preparation and execution.3. There is no terminological unity and the structural rules of transforming information on public finances into the norms of the budget legislation are violated.4. To achieve proper design and use of legal structures in the budget law should be general rules, principles present in the general legislative act – the Budget Code of Ukraine, and under it a few laws and regulations, which will trace structuring and consistency, clarity, simplicity and immediacy of legal material.