Pts. 1 through 3 for sale by Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. ; "January 28, 1982"--Pt. 1 ; Includes bibliographical references. ; pt. 1. [No distinctive title] -- pt. 2. Selected congressional testimony and speeches by Adm. H.G. Rickover, 1953-81 -- pt. 3. Navy contracts and government policies -- pt. 4. Shipbuilding claims -- pt. 5. Lawyers and legal ethics -- pt. 6. Cost accounting standards, independent research and development, and miscellaneous matters. ; Mode of access: Internet.
The hallmark of the new positive theories of the judiciary is that Supreme Court justices will frequently defer to the preferences of Congress when making decisions, particularly in statutory cases in which it is purportedly easy for Congress to reverse the Court. Alternatively, judicial attitudinalists argue that the institutional structures facing the Court allow the justices to vote their sincere policy preferences. This paper compares these sincere and sophisticated models of voting behavior by Supreme Court justices. Using a variety of tests on the votes of Supreme Court justices in statutory cases decided between 1947 and 1992, I find some evidence of sophisticated behavior, but most tests suggest otherwise. Moreover, direct comparisons between the two models unambiguously favor the attitudinal model. I conclude that the justices overwhelmingly engage in rationally sincere behavior. (American Political Science Review / FUB)
The Union of International Associations' documentation on international non- governmental organizations (INGOs) is a treasure trove for historians and social scientists alike. INGOs are part and parcel of the modern world. They both reflect and influence social, political, cultural and economic conditions around the globe. They occupy a space of human activity in between, but connected to, the market and the state, and this space seems to be growing. The present chapter seeks to show how a historical investigation into this space might benefit from the use of UIA data. As other contributions to this volume have noted, the UIA aims to register the key activities of all INGOs that exist or have ever existed. As anyone familiar with historical databases would immediately admit, a database with such a large geographical (the globe) and temporal span (in principle that of human history, though in practice mostly the past two centuries) cannot, and never will be, complete in its coverage. This is also acknowledged by the UIA and is partly caused by the fact that most of the data is provided by the organizations themselves. For the present purpose – namely the visualization of various long-term developments – we will, however, assume that it can nonetheless offer a representative picture. For practical reasons, we focus on the period between 1800 and 1970, concentrating on two UIA datasets: the annual congress calendar and the Yearbook series, featuring all organizations that meet the UIA's definition of an INGO.
The main issues discussed at the VIII Russian Philosophical Congress held in Moscow are considered, an assessment of its results is given. The appeal to the memory of outstanding Russian philosophers A.A. Zinoviev, V.V. Mironov, V.S. Stepin, I.T. Frolov, B.G. Yudin and other colleagues-philosophers gave the work of the congress the character of a philosophical reconstruction carried out in the space of personal knowledge. The question of the polycentricity of the modern world allowed us to proceed to the consideration of the civilizational ideas of Russian philosophers. The issues of civilizational differences and relations between Russia and the West found a significant addition at the plenary session "A.A. Zinoviev's Philosophy and Modernity", at which A.A. Guseynov, V.A. Lectorsky, A.P. Kozyrev and others spoke. The recognition of civilizational diversity, as A.V. Smirnov specially noted, involves thinking about the polycentricity of philosophy itself, about its role in ensuring the "coherence" of culture as an integrity. The symposium dedicated to the memory of V.V. Mironov, "Metaphysics does not die", allowed us to draw a number of generalizing conclusions about the metaphysical foundations of philosophy and the need to understand it as a form of cultural self-consciousness and civic identity.