Suchergebnisse

Çağın getirdiği yeni ve sınır aşan suçlarla mücadele sürecinde 1999 yılında faaliyete geçen Avrupa Birliği Kolluk Kuvvetleri İşbirliği Ajansı (Europol), Avrupa Birliği'nin (AB) karşılaştığı terörizm, uluslararası uyuşturucu kaçakçılığı, euro sahteciliği, kara para aklama, insan kaçakçılığı gibi suçlar ve siber suçlarla mücadele eden AB'nin polis teşkilatıdır. Europol-Türkiye ilişkilerine bakıldığında ise, Europol ile Türkiye arasında stratejik ortaklık anlaşması olduğu görülmektedir. AB üyesi olan devletlerin doğal üyesi oldukları Europol ile Türkiye arasında stratejik ve teknik seviyede işbirliği yapmasına olanak veren anlaşma "Türkiye Cumhuriyeti ve Avrupa Polis Teşkilatı Arasında İş Birliğine İlişkin Anlaşma" adıyla yapılmıştır. Bu alandaki çalışmalar, Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü bünyesinde bulunan INTERPOL-Europol Dairesi Başkanlığı tarafından takip edilmektedir. Europol ile Türkiye arasında işbirliği anlaşması, Avrupa Konseyi Sözleşmesi standartlarında yer alan Türkiye'de kişisel verilerin korumasına ilişkin bir kanun olmadığı için stratejik ortak düzeyinde devam etmektedir. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, 24 Mart 2016'da 6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu'nu kabul etmiştir. Bu gelişme ile eş zamanlı olarak Türkiye, Europol ile operasyonel iş birliği anlaşması yapmak için bazı girişimlerde bulunmuştur. Türkiye halen Europol'ün operasyonel ortağı olabilmeye yönelik çalışmalarını devam ettirmektedir. Çalışmada, öncelikle Europol'ün tarihsel arka planı aktarılmış, sonraki bölümde Europol'ün faaliyetleri ele alınmıştır. Son bölümde ise, Europol-Türkiye ilişkileri incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak çalışmada Europol-Türkiye ilişkilerinde kurumsal ve hukuksal eksiklikler öne çıkarılmıştır. Böylece, kurumsal anlamda ilgili kurumların daha aktif olması, hukuksal anlamda ise ilgili düzenlemelerin yürürlüğe girmesinden bahsedilmiştir. ; European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), which come into operation in 1999 in the process of struggling against new and transboundary crimes brought by the age, it is the EU's police organization that fights against terrorism, international drug trafficking, euro counterfeiting, money laundering, human trafficking and cyber crimes faced by the European Union (EU). When examing the Europol-Turkey relations, it is seen that there is an agreement on strategic cooperation between Europol and Turkey. Between Turkey and Europol, of which EU member states are natural members, an agreement that enables cooperation at a strategic and technical level has been made by the name of "Between the Republic of Turkey and the European Police Organization Agreement on Cooperation ". Actions in this field are followed by the INTERPOL-Europol Department within General Directorate of Police. The agreement between Europol and Turkey continues to be a strategic cooperation level because of the absence of a law in Turkey on the protection of personal data in the standards of The Council of Europe Convention. Turkish Grand National Assembly passed the Personal Data Protection Law No. 6698 on March 24, 2016. Concurrent with this progress, Turkey has attempted to make operational cooperation agreement with Europol. Yet, Turkey is sustaining its efforts to become Europol's operational partner. In the study, first of all, the historical background of Europol was explained, and in the next section Europol's activities were discussed and in the next section. In the last part, Europol-Turkey relationships were examined. As a result, institutional and legal shortcomings in the Europol-Turkey relations are highlighted in the study. Therefore, it was mentioned that the relevant institutions should be more active in the institutional sense and the related regulations should be entered into force in the legal sense.

"October 7, 2002"--Pt. 2. ; "October 3, 2002"--[Pt. 1]. ; Shipping list no.: 2003-0026-P ([pt. 1]), 2003-0030-P (pt. 2). ; Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. ; Subtitle pt. 2: Supplemental report (to accompany H.R. 5400). ; Caption title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

This paper explores the seeming paradox of Europe's strategic dependence and minimal EU presence in the Gulf. The Strategic Partnership agreed in June 2004 has done little to advance any sense of coherence or purpose in relations with the Gulf states in the face of the continued belief of some of the larger Member States in the value of their bilateral relationships with particular Gulf states. The resulting ambiguity in European policy has been exacerbated by the ways in which Gulf states themselves have dealt with Europe, looking less to the Gulf Cooperation Council as the preferred interlocutor with the EU, than at maintaining older, bilateral political and military relationships with particular Member States. The assessment of the relationship is set against the economic and strategic role of the USA, and the raised tensions in the Gulf region since September 11 and the invasion of Iraq.

Finds 2 major dimensions underlying these relationships, one addressing cooperation and the other emphasizing the barriers to cooperative research. Path analysis is employed to test models regarding the potential for cooperative undertakings for economic development. (Abstract amended)

"June 9, 1998." ; Shipping list no.: 98-0280-P. ; Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. ; "Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary ." ; Mode of access: Internet.

AbstractDuring the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the United States, the coordination and cooperation between the federal government and the states failed. American governors were thus tasked with making critical public health policy choices—under extreme uncertainty—with varying institutional capacities, partisan pressures, and state demographic differences. Yet most of the nation's governors chose to impose a face covering or mask mandate to limit the spread of cases. We collected each governor's executive order that mandated the conditions under which their residents would be required to wear a mask and employed a sentiment analysis program to extract key qualities of crisis leadership communication. Our analyses provide insights into the institutional and partisan factors that determined a face mask mandate as well as the institutional, demographic, and leadership communication qualities that affected the total number of cases per capita in the states. Our findings have important implications for post‐pandemic policy recommendations with respect to the effectiveness of policies that seek to lower the transmission of viruses in public spaces and the characteristics of impactful public health messaging by government leaders.