Cognition and Social Interpretation
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 181-219
ISSN: 1537-5390
6053072 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 181-219
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The review of politics, Band 55, S. 421-441
ISSN: 0034-6705
Examines the consequences of preempting common law or precedents in the 1992 US Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
In: https://doi.org/10.7916/D83778R6
Rubin succeeds in persuading us that the traditional equation of "legislation" and "law" is problematic in the administrative state -- that legislation is more often concerned with the (other) organs of government from which "law" emerges than with its direct formulation. Yet even if we accept this as a natural development, not a disease of which the body politic should be purged, the relationships between those responsible for "legislation" and those responsible for "law" should be a matter of active concern. Our wish for law, for conditions that will conduce to its creation, remains relevant to any theories we may hold for legislation. If delegation and void-for-vagueness, for example, do not serve well as direct measures of the worth or validity of legislative products, they continue to embody systemic values deserving of respect and consequently influencing our notions of appropriate relations between the legislative and law making efforts to the extent those are distinct. An insight that properly turns our attention from performance to control needs to notice how various options on the placement or exercise of control may affect the law-character of the system's ultimate output. Congress is not the only institution controlling, and the new theory for which Rubin calls must be concerned both with separation-of-powers questions concerning the appropriate allocation of controls across the whole of government, and the probable impact on Congress's legislating of the various kinds of controls that might be imagined. While today's theory of legislation must be differentiated from our theory of law, one cannot free one from the other. Professor Rubin's analysis pays insufficient heed to the continuing relationships.
BASE
In: The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties, S. 168-187
In: Политическая лингвистика, Heft 3, S. 189-197
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 169-188
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Selected studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy 19
In: Law and ReligionCurrent Legal Issues 2001 Volume 4, S. 82-99
In: Constructional approaches to language volume 9
On de-limiting context / Marina Terkourafi -- Constructions and context : when a construction constructs context / José Deulofeu and Jeanne-Marie Debaisieux -- Representing contextual factors in language change : between frames and constructions / Mirjam Fried -- Grammatical constructions in dialogue / Per Linell -- Interactional construction grammar : contextual features of determination in dialectal Swedish / Camilla Wide -- Contextual cues for particle placement : multiplicity, motivation, modeling / Bert Cappelle -- Conditionals and mental space set-up : evidence from German word order / Ilona Vandergriff -- Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar : the case of modal verbs / Ronny Boogaart
SSRN
In: ProtoSociology, Band 17, S. 119-137
In: ProtoSociology, Band 14, S. 67-84