Institute of World Economy and International Relations
In: The Statesman’s Yearbook; The Stateman’s Yearbook, S. 78-78
2101783 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Statesman’s Yearbook; The Stateman’s Yearbook, S. 78-78
In: Juridikum: die Zeitschrift für Kritik - Recht - Gesellschaft, Heft 4, S. 514-521
ISSN: 2309-7477
In: Frieden lernen. Friedenspädagogik und Erziehung im 20. Jahrhundert., S. 221-232
In: Kölner Schriften zu Recht und Staat Band 54
Die UN-Kinderrechtskonvention ist ein Menschenrechtsvertrag, der die Rechte von Kindern weltweit stärken soll. Doch welche Rechte fallen überhaupt unter den Begriff der Kinderrechte und welche Mechanismen zu ihrer Durchsetzung gibt es? Die Autorin geht diesen Fragen vor dem Hintergrund des Völkerrechts und des deutschen Verfassungsrechts nach. Dabei greift sie auch aktuelle Fragestellungen wie die nach einer Verankerung von Kindesrechten in der deutschen Verfassung auf. Ergänzt wird die Analyse der UN-Kinderrechtskonvention durch eine Untersuchung ihres Verhältnisses zu der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention im Hinblick auf verbürgte Kinderrechte und deren Wirkung im deutschen Recht
In: The Statesman’s Yearbook; The Stateman’s Yearbook, S. 47-47
In: Vereinte Nationen: Zeitschrift für die Vereinten Nationen und ihre Sonderorganisationen, Band 62, Heft 2, S. 51-58
ISSN: 0042-384X
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 55, Heft 3, S. 427-444
ISSN: 0032-3470
World Affairs Online
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 55, Heft 1, S. 203-205
ISSN: 0032-3470
In: Archiv des Völkerrechts: AVR, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 282-284
ISSN: 0003-892X
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 770-788
ISSN: 1541-0986
Environmental devastation is not only a byproduct of war, but has also been a military strategy since ancient times. How have the norms and laws of war addressed the damage that war inflicts on the environment? How should "environmental war crimes" be defined and addressed? I address these questions by critically examining the way that distinctions between legitimate and illegitimate wartime environmental destruction have been drawn in debates on just war theory and the laws of war. I identify four distinctive formulations for framing the wartime significance of nature that appear in such debates and analyze how each is associated with distinctive claims regarding what constitutes "humaneness" in times of war: nature as property; nature as combatant; nature as Pandora's Box; and nature as victim. I argue that efforts to investigate and judge the environmental impact of war destabilize and expose the limitations of core distinctions that animate humanitarian norms, but also offer an important and neglected source of guidance in addressing those limitations.
In: Forum Erwachsenenbildung: die evangelische Zeitschrift für Bildung im Lebenslauf, Heft 3
ISSN: 1433-769X
In: Selbstverwaltung
In: Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration: IRPA = Stjórnmál og stjórnsýsla, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 345-372
ISSN: 1670-679X
This study asks how well the Nordic nations have managed in a new social environment of globalization, increasing competition and new challenges to the Nordic welfare model? The focus is on well-being outcomes, rather than on welfare inputs (expenditure generosity or rights and institutional features). For this purpose we have constructed a data bank with well-being measures for 29 modern nations, based on 69 variables in 9 well-being dimensions. With this data we have constructed an overall well-being index and sub-indexes for these nations. We find that in terms of well-being outcomes the Nordic nations (including Iceland) share major patterns of well-being characteristics. In a data-driven clustering analysis (with Dendograms, using the Ward Method) of all the 69 variables, our well-being outcomes cluster the nations in a way comparable to Francis Castles' families of nations and Esping-Andersen's main welfare regime types. We disaggregate the outcomes by clusters and well-being dimensions.The findings indicate that the five Nordic nations had the highest level of well-being amongst modern nations during the period from 2005 to 2008, along with Netherlands, Switzerland and Luxembourg. The strength of the Nordic cluster of nations seems to be their emphasis on equality of income distribution, poverty reduction, improving family conditions and facilitating social cohesion and participation, while also promoting economic strength and a high affluence level. The study also assesses correlates of well-being amongst these nations, including welfare state generosity, political influences, social trust, strength of democracy and distributional characteristics. The findings support a narrative emphasizing the importance of lifting the worse off up the well-being ladder of society. That seems to be the most efficient strategy for improving the overall well-being of modern nations.
In: The military law and the law of war review: Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 303-351
ISSN: 2732-5520