Reconciling Anthropology and Law
In: Journal of legal anthropology: JLA, Volume 2, Issue 2, p. 105-108
ISSN: 1758-9584
When I was thinking of going to law school, I went to speak with a law
professor at the university where I had done my PhD. 'Well, Mr. Rosen,'
he said, 'the thing about law school is it will teach you how to think.'
I kept waiting for the other shoe to drop: think about law, think like
a lawyer. No, he meant think – period. With all due humility, I was at
that time coming from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton,
NJ, and should like to imagine that I had actually learned a few things
while doing my doctorate at his own university. In the forty years since,
while serving as an adjunct professor of law and visiting professor at
several such institutions, I have also encountered the occasional law
scholar who, in a moment of academic noblesse oblige, has regarded my
anthropology credentials as quaint but insufficient evidence that one
has the tough-minded capacity that flows from a legal education. The
lawyers may pay some attention to a few other disciplines, but, even
though they may have given in to the allure of economics and bolstered
their intellectual self-image with the odd philosopher or historian, the
question remains why the law schools still tend to regard anthropology
as almost entirely irrelevant.