Suchergebnisse

With the anticipated rise of over double the Paris Agreement's 2°C goal, climate change is likely to jeopardize the pros- perity of future generations. Thus, it has become increasingly apparent that young demographics must be integrated into the process required to achieve the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) owing to their disproportionately threatened futures over that of adult demographics. A major barrier to children engaging with SDG progress is evident in Australian educational policies, which fail to provide adequate opportunities for young people. Moreover, a lack of individual autonomy in young people can lead to feelings of disempowerment regarding sustainability. Hence, at the present moment, young people in Australian educational institutions are deprived of adequate support systems that could help them feel empowered by contributing to sustainability progress. Research methods undertaken for this paper include literature review, interviews with Australian students and teachers, research into successful international frameworks for youth programs, policy review, and analysis of Australian educational frameworks. Opportunities for empowerment through education and intergenerational support are vital for children to be integrated into the work of SDGs. This fails to transpire within Australian educational institutions. Although there exist various independent organisations which promote tools for youth empowerment throughout Australia, the lack of wider systematic support results in insufficient accessibility for teachers and students alike. Whilst young people possess the capacity to play a role in politically securitising climate change and the achievement of SDGs, supportive systems are required through structural changes, including policy, to initiate progress.

İstanbul Ermeni Patrikhanesi, Osmanlı Devleti tarafından ülkede yaşayan Ermenilerin dinî ve siyasî idare merkezi olarak kabul edilmişti. Bu yapısı itibariyle patrikhane, doğrudan ya da dolaylı olarak, Ermeni sorununun ortaya çıkış ve gelişim sürecinde her zaman sorunun bir parçası olmak durumunda kalmıştır. Patrikliğin ülke içindeki konumu düşünüldüğünde son derece doğal olan bu durum, görev başındaki patrikleri çoğu zaman dinî ve siyasî yetkileri açısından, devlet ve Ermeni cemaatinin patriklik dışındaki kimi sivil unsurları arasında kalmak gibi bir ikileme düşürmüştür. Osmanlı Devleti tarafından Ermeni toplumunun baş temsilcisi ve Ermenilerle ilgili problemlerin asıl muhatabı kabul edilen patrikler, Ermeni toplumunun belli kesimlerince bir dinî/siyasî liderden ziyade "Osmanlı Devleti'nin Ermeniler üzerinde söz sahibi olan yüksek dereceli bir memuru" olarak algılanmışlardır. Dolayısıyla Osmanlı Devleti'nin, Ermenilerin idaresi ile ilgili her konuda doğrudan tek muhatap kabul ettiği patrikler, temsil ettikleri bu siyasi güçle birlikte, zamanla kendileri dışında gelişen farklı siyasi hesaplaşmaların da tarafı olmak durumunda kalacaklardır. Toplumda gelişen farklı siyasi fraksiyonlar, Ermeni ahali arasında güç bulmaya çalışmakla birlikte patrikhane tarafından da kendi görüşlerinin ve hedeflerinin benimsenmesi için uğraşacaklardır. Zira patrikhaneye egemen olmak aynı zamanda Osmanlı sınırlarındaki tüm Ermenilere egemen olmak anlamına gelmektedir. Bu mücadeleler mâlûm olduğu üzere sadece Ermeni toplumunun kendi içindeki hâkimiyet kavgalarıyla sınırlı kalmayarak, Ermeni ahalinin bir kısmının Osmanlı Devleti ile de karşı karşıya gelmesine neden olacaktır. Bu çalışmada Ermeni sorununun bu yönlerine odaklanılarak, patrikhane çevresinde gelişen hadiseler ve kavgalar incelenmektedir. (Text auf dem Einband - Verlagstext)

On June 28, 1969, a small gay bar in New York City's Greenwich Village neighborhood, The Stonewall Inn, was raided by the police. Rather than the norm of passive consent to the police, the patrons began to fight back leading to an all-out riot in the streets of lower Manhattan. The Stonewall Riot is referred to by many as the turning point in the struggle for gay rights

abstract: Historical research produced for a portion of the exhibit entitled Civil Rights in Arizona, which was displayed at the Luhrs Gallery, Hayden Library in 2012-2013. The action at the ROTC Building was one of the largest protests in Arizona State University history, resulting in the arrest of ten individuals. The second file entitled "Who Were the Tempe Ten" describes the arrested students and unaffiliated persons.

Klappentext: Das politische Professorentum der Universität Jena leistete einen wichtigen Beitrag zur Entstehung des deutschen Liberalismus im frühen 19. Jahrhundert. Der Autor geht den ersten Spuren dieser Entwicklung im akademisch-universitären Bereich nach und zeigt, wie aus Anfängen im Gefolge der Französischen Revolution allmählich bis zum Erlaß der Karlsbader Beschlüsse eine liberal-nationale Bewegung entstand, die bereits Ansätze einer politischen Partei erkennen ließ. Dabei werden sowohl die wichtigsten Jenaer Professoren von Schiller, Hufeland und Fichte bis Luden, Oken und Fries als auch ihr Verhältnis zu den Studenten und der politischen Öffentlichkeit einer genauen Analyse unterzogen. Die politischen Professoren der Universität Jena lassen sich als Bildungsbürger zwischen Staat und Gesellschaft kennzeichnen und fungierten als wichtige Wegbereiter der Moderne in Deutschland.

This special issue of Wicazo Sa Review continues the theme of colonization/decolonization from the previous issue and contains transcriptions of two sessions of the 2004 American Indian Studies Consortium annual conference, entitled "Who Stole Indian Studies?" at Arizona State University. The articles add to our knowledge by contributing important discussions addressing such issues as empowerment, law, research ethics, Freedmen entitlements, reproductive rights, spiritual appropriation, and identity. The Consortium transcripts provide invaluable presentations by key native scholars about the past, present, and future of American Indian studies. Dr. David Wilkins provided the keynote address for the conference.